Journals / European Archives of Medical Research / 2022 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 2

Clinical Features of the Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Two Centers Experience

Pages
102–110
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall survival (OS) was not different between patients who had monoclonal gammopathy and those who did not (p=0.922).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a hematologic malignancy characterized by the clonal proliferation of lymphocytes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The study was conducted retrospectively in 183 patients who were followed up in the hematology departments of two centers between 1999 and 2014.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overall survival (OS) was not different between patients who had monoclonal gammopathy and those who did not (p=0.922).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a hematologic malignancy characterized by the clonal proliferation of lymphocytes. The aim of the study was to analyze the demographic data, treatment indications, treatment responses and total survival data of patients with the diagnosis of CLL. Methods: The study was conducted retrospectively in 183 patients who were followed up in the hematology departments of two centers between 1999 and 2014. Results: The mean age of the patients was 64.72±11.40 years and 120 (65.6%) patients were male and 63 (34.4%) were female. Overall survival (OS) was not different between patients who had monoclonal gammopathy and those who did not (p=0.922). Among the patients, 105 received treatment while 78 of them were observed without a treatment. Chlorambucil was the most frequently (33%) used drug during the first line of chemotherapy. The difference between the distribution of male and female patients according to risk groups was statistically significant (p=0.018). Among patients who did not receive therapy and with higher Rai and Binet stages, overall and progression free survive were lower (p=0.0011). Furthermore, increases in β2-microglobulin and sedimentation revealed lower rates of survival (p=0.001 and p=0.008 respectively). Conclusion: It can be concluded that monoclonal bands are not associated with survival in CLL. Although the demographic information of our patients was similar to that of patients in other studies, OS was found to be less. This issue can be explained by the fact that the patients receiving chemotherapy were at a further stage.

🔖

Cite This Article

DURSUN, F. E., KURTOĞLU, E., TİMURAĞAOĞLU, A. (2022). Clinical Features of the Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Two Centers Experience. European Archives of Medical Research, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 2, 102–110. https://ajindex.com/articles/510288

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Miranda-Filho A, Piñeros M, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Monnereau A, Bray F. Epidemiological patterns of leukaemia in 184 countries: a population-based study. Lancet Haematol 2018;5:e14-e24
  2. Lenartova A, Johannesen TB, Tjønnfjord GE. National trends in incidence and survival of chronic lymphocytic leukemia in Norway for 1953-2012: a systematic analysis of population-based data. Cancer Med 2016;5:3588-95
  3. Pulte D, Castro FA, Jansen L, Luttmann S, Holleczek B, Nennecke A, et al. Trends in survival of chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients in Germany and the USA in the first decade of the twenty-first century. J Hematol Oncol 2016;9:28
  4. Brenner H, Gondos A, Pulte D. Trends in long-term survival of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia from the 1980s to the early 21st century. Blood 2008;111:4916-21
  5. Wanner D, Steurer M. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia at ASH 2017. Memo 2018;11:105-8
  6. Chiorazzi N. Implications of new prognostic markers in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2012;2012:76-87
  7. Moreno C, Montserrat E. New prognostic markers in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood Rev 2008;22:211-9
  8. Rai KR, Sawitsky A, Cronkite EP, Chanana AD, Levy RN, Pasternack BS. Clinical staging of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 1975;46:219-234
  9. Binet JL, Leporrier M, Dighiero G, Charron D, D’Athis P, Vaugier G, et al. A clinical staging system for chronic lymphocytic leukemia: prognostic significance. Cancer 1977;40:855-64
  10. Cheson BD, Bennett JM, Grever M, Kay N, Keating MJ, O’Brien S, et al. National Cancer Institute-sponsored Working Group guidelines for chronic lymphocytic leukemia: revised guidelines for diagnosis and treatment. Blood 1996;87:4990-7
  11. Cartwright RA, Gurney KA, Moorman AV. Sex ratios and the risks of haematological malignancies. Br J Haematol 2002;118:1071-7
  12. Dores GM, Anderson WF, Curtis RE, Landgren O, Ostroumova E, Bluhm EC, et al. Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and small lymphocytic lymphoma: overview of the descriptive epidemiology. Br J Haematol 2007;139:809-19
  13. Diehl LF, Karnell LH, Menck HR. The American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer and the American Cancer Society. The National Cancer Data Base report on age, gender, treatment, and outcomes of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Cancer 1999;86:2684-92
  14. Binet JL, Auquier A, Dighiero G, Chastang C, Piguet H, Goasguen J, et al. A new prognostic classification of chronic lymphocytic leukemia derived fr