Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale izolatlarının antimikrobiyel duyarlılıkları

Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of the study was to determine susceptibility of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale isolates to antibiotics from layers, broilers and turkeys.

📊

Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: The total of 28 isolates (2 layer pullets, 5 broilers, 21 turkeys and 2 standard strains) of O. rhinotracheale were tested.

💡

Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: In the treatment of O. rhinotracheale infections firstly antibiotic sensitivity should be determined.

🔬Design:Research Article

📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample

⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of the study was to determine susceptibility of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale isolates to antibiotics from layers, broilers and turkeys. Materials and Methods: The total of 28 isolates (2 layer pullets, 5 broilers, 21 turkeys and 2 standard strains) of O. rhinotracheale were tested. Eighteen antimicrobial discs (penicillin, ampicillin, amoxicillin, amoxicillin + clavulanic acid, oxytetracycline, enrofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, danofloxacin, norfloxacin, trimethoprim + sulfamethoxazole, clarithromycin, lincomycin, clindamycin, erythromycin, spiramycin, gentamicin, neomycin and streptomycin) were used to determine the susceptibility of O. rhinotracheale isolates to antimicrobials. Results: While all O. rhinotracheale isolates (100%) were susceptible to ampicillin, amoxicillin and ciprofloxacin, all of O. rhinotracheale isolates (100%) were resistant to gentamicin, streptomycin and trimethoprim + sulfamethoxazole. Conclusion: In the treatment of O. rhinotracheale infections firstly antibiotic sensitivity should be determined.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, yumurtacı tavuk, etçi tavuk ve hindilerden izole edilen Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale izolatlarının antimikrobiyal maddelere duyarlılıklarını belirlemek amaçlandı. Gereç ve Yöntem: Toplam 28 O. rhinotracheale izolatı (2 yumurtacı tavuk, 5 etçi tavuk, 21 hindi, 2 O. rhinotracheale standart suşu) test edildi. On sekiz antimikrobiyal disk (penisilin, ampisilin, amoksisilin, amoksisilin + klavulonik asit, enrofloksasin, siprofloksasin, danofloksasin, norfloksasin, oksitetrasiklin, trimetoprim + sulfametoksazol, klaritomisin, linkomisin, eritromisin, spiramisin, klindamisin, gentamisin, neomisin ve streptomisin) kullanılarak, O. rhinotracheale izolatlarının antimikrobiyel maddelere duyarlılıkları belirlendi. Bulgular: O. rhinotracheale izolatlarının tümü (%100) ampisilin, amoksisilin ve siprofloksasine duyarlı iken gentamisin, streptomisin ve trimetoprim + sulfametaksazola dirençli bulundu. Öneri: O. rhinotracheale enfeksiyonlarının tedavisinde öncelikle etkenin antibiyotik duyarlılıklarının belirlenmesi gerektiği kanaatine varıldı.

🔖

Cite This Article

HADİMLİ, H. H., SAYIN, Z., ERGANİŞ, O., KAV, K. (2022). Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale izolatlarının antimikrobiyel duyarlılıkları. Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 1, 27–30. https://ajindex.com/articles/510115

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

Open in New Tab ↗

↗New Tab

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

Ak S, Turan N, 2001. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale isolated from broiler chickens in Turkey. Vet Arshiv, 71, 121-127.
Chin RP, Droual R, 1997. Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale infection, in: Diseases of Poultry. Ed; Calnek BW, 10th edition, Iowa state University Press, USA, pp: 1012- 1015. Devriese LA, De Herdt P, 2001.
Haesebroude, F. Antibiotic sensitivity and resistance in Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale strains from Belgian broiler chickens. Avian Pathol, 30, 197-200.
Dodouyt J, Leorat J, Van Empel PCM, Gardin Y, Dore C, 1995. Isolement d’un nouvel pathogene chez la dinde: Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale; Conduite a tenir. In Proceedings of the Journees de la Recherche Avicole, Angers, pp: 240-243.
Erganiş O, Ateş M, Hadimli HH, Çorlu M, 2002. Tavuk ve hindilerden Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale izolasyonu. Turk J Vet Anim Sci, 26, 543-547.
Garmyn A, Martel A, Froyman R, Nauwynck H, Duchateau L, Haesebrouck F, Pasmans F, 2009. Efficacy of four enrofloxacin treatment regimens against experimental infection in turkey poults with avian pneumovirus and Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale. Avian Pathol, 38, 287-292.
Hadimli HH, Erganiş O, Kav K, 2003. Hindilerde Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale enfeksiyonu. Vet Bil Derg, 19, 105-108. Hafez HM, 1996. Current status on the role of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale (ORT) in respiratory disease complexes in poultry. Arch Geflügelk, 60, 208-211.
Hinz KH, Blome C, Ryll M,1994. Acute exudative pneumonia and airsacculitis associated with Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale in Turkeys. Vet Rec, 135, 233-234.
Malik YS, Olsen K, Kumar K, Goyal SM, 2003. In vitro antibiotic resistance profiles of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale strains from Minnesota turkeys during 1996- 2002. Avian Dis, 47, 588-593.
Marien M, Decostere A, Duchateau L, Chiers K, Froyman R, Nauwynck H, 2006a. Efficacy of enrofloxacin, florfenicol and amoxicillin against Ornithobacterium r h i n o t r a - cheale and Escherichia coli O2:K1 dual infection in turkeys following APV priming. Vet Microbiol, 121, 94-104.
Marien M, Decostere A, Nauwynck H, Froyman R, Devriese L, Haesebrouck F, 2006b. In vivo selection of reduced enrofloxacin susceptibility in Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale and its resistance-related mutations in gyrA. Microbiol Drug Resist, 12, 140-144.
Marien M, Nauwynck H, Duchateau L, Martel A, Chiers K, Devriese L, Froyman R, Decostere A, 2006c. Comparison of the efficacy of four antimicrobial treatment schemes against