Journals / Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences / 2015 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 4

Karaman ilinde yetiştirilen koyunlarda Blue Tongue Virus enfeksiyonunun serolojik olarak araştırılması.

A serological investigation of Blue Tongue Virus infection in sheep breeds in Karaman province

Pages
214–217
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The climate conditions of Turkey might be suitable for the survival of Culicoides vectors of Blue Tongue Virus; hence sheep folks should be controlled constantly in term of BTV.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study was to describe the seroprevalence rate of Blue Tongue Virus in sheep flocks in Karaman.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: A total of 350 sheep blood serum samples were collected from 5 flocks (70 from each flocks) that were randomly selected.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The climate conditions of Turkey might be suitable for the survival of Culicoides vectors of Blue Tongue Virus; hence sheep folks should be controlled constantly in term of BTV.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to describe the seroprevalence rate of Blue Tongue Virus in sheep flocks in Karaman. Materials and Methods: A total of 350 sheep blood serum samples were collected from 5 flocks (70 from each flocks) that were randomly selected. Samples were tested against to Blue Tongue Virus antibodies by a commercial competitive enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (cELISA). Results: Prevalence of antibodies to Blue Tongue Virus in flocks was 32.85%, 28.57%, 25.71%, 37.14%, 41.42%, respectively. Out of 350 serum samples, 116 (33.14%) were positive for Blue Tongue Virus specific antibodies by cELISA. Conclusion: The climate conditions of Turkey might be suitable for the survival of Culicoides vectors of Blue Tongue Virus; hence sheep folks should be controlled constantly in term of BTV.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışma Karamanda bulunan koyun işletmelerinde Blue Tongue Virusa karşı seroprevalansın belirlenmesi amacı ile yapıldı. Gereç ve Yöntem: Beş farklı işletmeden rastgele seçilen (her birinden 70 adet) toplam 350 koyundan kan serum örnekleri toplandı. Örnekler Blue Tongue Virusa karşı gelişen antikor varlığı yönünden ticari olarak temin edilen competitive enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (cELISA) ile test edildi. Bulgular: İşletmelerde Blue Tongue Virusa karşı gelişen antikor prevalansı sırası ile %32.85, %28.57, %25.71, %37.14 ve %41.42 olarak belirlendi. Toplam 350 serum örneğinin 116 (%33.14)sı Blue Tongue Virusa spesifik antikor varlığı yönünden cELISA ile pozitif tespit edildi. Öneri: Türkiyenin iklim şartları Blue Tongue Virusun vektör Culicoides türlerinin yaşamları için uygun olduğundan, koyunlar Blue Tongue Virus yönünden sürekli kontrol edilmelidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BULUT, O., KALE, M., ŞİMŞEK, A., YAVRU, S., YAPİCİ, O., AVCİ, O. (2022). Karaman ilinde yetiştirilen koyunlarda Blue Tongue Virus enfeksiyonunun serolojik olarak araştırılması.. Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 4, 214–217. https://ajindex.com/articles/509998

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Aradaib IE, Mohamed ME, Abdalla TM, Sarr J, Abdalla MA, Yousof MAM, Hassan YA, Karrar AR, 2005. Serogrouping of United States and some African serotypes of bluetongue virus using RT-PCR. Vet Microbiol, 111, 145-150.
  2. Aradaib IE, Smith WL, Osburn BI, Cullor JS, 2003. A multiplex PCR for simultaneous detection and differentiation of North American serotypes of bluetongue and epizootic hemorrhagic disease viruses. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis, 26, 77-87.
  3. Arenas-Montes A, Paniagua J, Arenas A, Lorca-Oro C, Carbonero A, Cano-Terriza D, Garcia-Bocanegra I, 2014. Spatialtemporal trends and factors associated with the Bluetongue Virus seropositivity in large game hunting areas from Southern Spain. Transbound Emerg Dis, doi: 10.1111/ tbed.12309. Attoui H, Maan SS, Anthony SJ, Mertens PPC, 2009. Bluetongue virus, other orbiviruses and other reoviruses: Their relationships and taxonomy. 1 edition, Elsevier/Academic Press,
  4. London, UK, pp: 23-552.
  5. Bishop AL, Barchia IM, Spohr LJ, 2000. Models for the dispersal in Australia of the arbovirus vector, Culicoides brevitarsis Kieffer (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae). Prev Vet Med, 47, 243-254.
  6. Bulut O, Yavru S, Yapkic O, Simsek A, Kale M, Avci O, 2006. Serological investigation of Bluetongue virus infection by serum neutralization test and Elisa in sheep and goats. Bull Vet Inst Pulawy, 50, 305-307.
  7. Carpenter S, Groschup MH, Garros C, Felippe-Bauer ML, Purse BV, 2013. Culicoides biting midges, arboviruses and public health in Europe. Antiviral Res, 100, 102-113.
  8. Darpel KE, Langner KFA, Nimtz M, Anthony SJ, Brownlie J, Haru-Hisa T, Mellor PS, Mertens PPC, 2011. Saliva proteins of vector Culicoides modify structure and infectivity of Bluetongue virus particles. PLoS ONE, 6, 1. Guis H, Caminade C, Calvete C, Morse AP, Tran A, Baylis M, 2012. Modeling the effects of past and future climate on the risk of bluetongue emergence in Europe. J R Soc Interface, 9, 339-350. Gür S, 2008. A serologic investigation of blue tongue virus (BTV) in cattle, sheep and gazella subgutturosa subgutturosa in southeastern Turkey. Trop Anim Health Pro, 40, 3. Kramps JA, Van Maanen K, Mars MH, Popma JK, Van Rijn PA, 2008. Validation of a commercial ELISA for the detection of bluetongue virus (BTV) specific antibodies in individual milk samples of Dutch dairy cows. Vet Microbiol, 130, 80- 87. Maan N, Maan S, Belaganahalli M, Ostlund E, Johnson D, Nomikou K, Mertens P, 2012. Identification and differentiation of the twenty six bluetongue virus serotypes by