Journals / Eurasian Journal of Pulmonology / 2018 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1

Can the da Vinci robotic system be alternative to open surgery for schwannoma in posterior mediastinum?

Pages
17–21
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Postoperative ptosis was detected in two patients with tumors where located in theapical region, and no mortality occurred.CONCLUSION: Due to the advantages of robotic surgery to the surgeon, patients with schwannomain extreme locations that would pose challenges in dissection could be operated with da Vinci system.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: In the present study, the outcomes and technical details of patients who underwentsurgical resection for benign schwannoma with the da Vinci robotic system are presented.MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the scope of our robotic surgery program, 26 (8.7%) patients out of296 patients were operated using the da Vinci robotic system.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Five patients (19.2%) who underwentsurgery of benign schwannoma were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Postoperative ptosis was detected in two patients with tumors where located in theapical region, and no mortality occurred.CONCLUSION: Due to the advantages of robotic surgery to the surgeon, patients with schwannomain extreme locations that would pose challenges in dissection could be operated with da Vinci system.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In the present study, the outcomes and technical details of patients who underwentsurgical resection for benign schwannoma with the da Vinci robotic system are presented.MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the scope of our robotic surgery program, 26 (8.7%) patients out of296 patients were operated using the da Vinci robotic system. Five patients (19.2%) who underwentsurgery of benign schwannoma were included in the study. Prospectively, collected data of thesepatients were retrospectively evaluated. Age, gender, robot docking and console times, length ofhospital stay, anatomic localizations of the lesions, pathology results, blood infusion needs, andmortality and morbidity rates of the patients were recorded.RESULTS: All patients were male, and the mean age was 43.2 ± 12.1 years. The mean length ofhospital stay was 3 ± 0.9 days. The mean console time was 27.6 ± 18.8 min, and the mean dockingtime was 12 ± 4 min. None of the patients received blood transfusion. Utility incision was made inonly one patient. Postoperative ptosis was detected in two patients with tumors where located in theapical region, and no mortality occurred.CONCLUSION: Due to the advantages of robotic surgery to the surgeon, patients with schwannomain extreme locations that would pose challenges in dissection could be operated with da Vinci system.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ayalp, K., Cosgun, T., Kaba, E., Toker, A. (2022). Can the da Vinci robotic system be alternative to open surgery for schwannoma in posterior mediastinum?. Eurasian Journal of Pulmonology, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1, 17–21. https://ajindex.com/articles/509679

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Teixeira JP, Bibas RA. Surgical treatment of tumors of the mediastinum: the Brazilian experience. In Martini N, Vogt-Moykoph I, eds.: Thoracic Surgery: Frantiers and Uncommon Neoplasms. st. Louis: Mosby, 1989
  2. Strollo DC, Rosado‑de‑Christenson ML, Jett JR. Primary mediastinal tumors: Part II. Tumors of the middle and posterior mediastinum. Chest 1997;112:1344‑57
  3. Shields TW. Overview of primary mediastinal tumors and cysts. In: Shields TW, LoCicero J, Ponn RB, Rusch VW. editors. General Thoracic Surgery. 6th ed., Vol
  4. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2005. p. 2489‑93
  5. Regnard JF, Magdeleinat P, Dromer C, Dulmet E, de Montpreville V, Levi JF, et al. Prognostic factors and long‑term results after thymoma resection: A series of 307 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;112:376‑84
  6. Marulli G, Maessen J, Melfi F, Schmid TA, Keijzers M, Fanucchi O, et al. Multi‑institutional european experience of robotic thymectomy for thymoma. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2016;5:18‑25
  7. Sugarbaker DJ. Thoracoscopy in the management of anterior mediastinal masses. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;56:653‑6
  8. Yoshino I, Hashizume M, Shimada M, Tomikawa M, Sugimachi K. Video‑assisted thoracoscopic extirpation of a posterior mediastinal mass using the da vinci computer enhanced surgical system. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;74:1235‑7
  9. Suda T, Sugimura H, Tochii D, Kihara M, Hattori Y. Single‑port thymectomy through an infrasternal approach. Ann Thorac Surg 2012;93:334‑6
  10. Veronesi G. Robotic lobectomy and segmentectomy for lung cancer: Results and operating technique. J Thorac Dis 2015;7:S122‑30
  11. Veronesi G, Cerfolio R, Cingolani R, Rueckert JC, Soler L, Toker A, et al. Report on first international workshop on robotic surgery in thoracic oncology. Front Oncol 2016;6:214
  12. Demirhan O, Ayalp K, Kaba E, Uyumaz E, Ozyturtkan MO, Toker A. Robotic anatomic pulmonary resection in octogenarian patients with primary lung cancer: Report of seven cases. Turk Gogus Kalp Dama 2016;24:489‑94
  13. Toker A, Özyurtkan MO, Kaba E, Nova G. Da vinci robotic system in the surgery for mediastinal bronchogenic cyst: A report on five patients. J Vis Surg 2015;1:23
  14. Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS, Minnich DJ. Operative techniques in robotic thoracic surgery for inferior or posterior mediastinal pathology. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012;143:1138‑43
  15. Melfi FM, Fanucchi O, Mussi A. Minimally invasive mediastinal surgery. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2016;5:10‑7
  16. Nakamura H, Suda T, Ikeda N,