Journals / Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 3

Primer akciğer kanserli oktojenaryan hastalarda robotik anatomik akciğer rezeksiyonu: Yedi olgunun sunumu

Robotic anatomic pulmonary resection in octogenarian patients with primary lung cancer: report of seven cases

Pages
489–494
Publication Date
2022-09-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Anatomical pulmonary resections with robotic approach may be performed in carefully selected octogenarian patients with primary lung tumor who may tolerate the operation and complete resection.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: This article aims to report our experience with robotic anatomic pulmonary resections in primary lung cancer patients aged 80 years and older and to compare the results with a younger patient population.Methods: Data of 75 patients who were performed robotic anatomic pulmonary resection in our clinic between October 2011 and January 2015 for primary lung cancer were retrospectively evaluated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients were divided into two groups as patients aged 80 years and older (octogenarians, n=7) (6 males, 1 female; mean age 82.0±1.8 years; range 80 to 84 years) and patients aged below 80 years (non-octogenarians, n=68) (51 males, 17 females; mean age 61±11 years; range 31 to 79 years) and the obtained results were compared.Results: Four lobectomies and three segmentectomies were performed in the seven octogenarian patients.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Anatomical pulmonary resections with robotic approach may be performed in carefully selected octogenarian patients with primary lung tumor who may tolerate the operation and complete resection.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background: This article aims to report our experience with robotic anatomic pulmonary resections in primary lung cancer patients aged 80 years and older and to compare the results with a younger patient population.Methods: Data of 75 patients who were performed robotic anatomic pulmonary resection in our clinic between October 2011 and January 2015 for primary lung cancer were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were divided into two groups as patients aged 80 years and older (octogenarians, n=7) (6 males, 1 female; mean age 82.0±1.8 years; range 80 to 84 years) and patients aged below 80 years (non-octogenarians, n=68) (51 males, 17 females; mean age 61±11 years; range 31 to 79 years) and the obtained results were compared.Results: Four lobectomies and three segmentectomies were performed in the seven octogenarian patients. Mean docking, console, and total operation durations were 21±12, 75±10 minutes, and 101±20, respectively. Mean duration of hospital stay was 6±4 days. There was no mortality, but minor complications occurred in two patients (29%). Although octogenarians had lower pulmonary function test results and longer durations of chest tube and hospital stay, their resection types, operation durations, resected lymph node numbers, size of lesions, mortality and morbidity rates were similar compared to those of non-octogenarians.Conclusion: This preliminary study demonstrates that postoperative outcomes of octogenarians who underwent robotic anatomic pulmonary resection were similar to those of younger patients. Anatomical pulmonary resections with robotic approach may be performed in carefully selected octogenarian patients with primary lung tumor who may tolerate the operation and complete resection.

Özet

Amaç: Bu yazıda 80 yaş ve üstü primer akciğer kanseri hastalarında robotik anatomik akciğer rezeksiyonları ile deneyimlerimiz sunuldu ve sonuçlar daha genç bir hasta nüfusu ile karşılaştırıldı.Ça lış ma pla nı: Ekim 2011 - Ocak 2015 tarihleri arasında primer akciğer kanseri nedeni ile kliniğimizde robotik anatomik pulmoner rezeksiyon uygulanan 75 hastanın verileri geriye yönelik değerlendirildi. Hastalar 80 yaş ve üstü (oktojenaryan, n=7) (6 erkek, 1 kadın; ort. yaş 82.0±1.8 yıl; dağılım 80-84 yıl) ve 80 yaş altı (oktojenaryan olmayan, n=68) (51 erkek, 17 kadın; ort. yaş 61±11 yıl; dağılım 31-79 yıl) olmak üzere iki gruba ayrıldı ve elde edilen sonuçlar karşılaştırıldı.Bul gu lar: Yedi oktojenaryan hastaya dört lobektomi ve üç segmentektomi uygulandı. Ortalama robot kurulum, konsol ve toplam ameliyat süreleri sırasıyla 21±12, 75±10 ve 101±20 dakika idi. Ortalama hastanede kalış süresi 6±4 gün idi. Mortalite yoktu, fakat iki hastada (%29) minör komplikasyon gelişti. Oktojenaryan hastaların akciğer fonksiyon test sonuçları daha düşük, dren ve hastanede kalış süreleri daha uzun olsa da rezeksiyon tipleri, ameliyat süreleri, rezeke edilen lenf nodu sayıları, lezyonların boyutu, mortalite ve morbidite oranları, oktojenaryan olmayanlarla karşılaştırıldığında benzerdi.So nuç: Bu öncü çalışma robotik anatomik akciğer rezeksiyonu yapılan oktojenaryan hastaların ameliyat sonrası sonuçlarının daha genç hastalarla benzer olduğunu göstermektedir. Robotik yaklaşımla anatomik akciğer rezeksiyonları, ameliyatı ve tam rezeksiyonu kaldırabilecek uygun seçilmiş oktojenaryan primer akciğer tümörlü hastalarda uygulanabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KABA, E., AYALP, K., UYUMAZ, E., ÖZYURTKAN, M. O., DEMİRHAN, Ö., TOKER, A. (2022). Primer akciğer kanserli oktojenaryan hastalarda robotik anatomik akciğer rezeksiyonu: Yedi olgunun sunumu. Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 3, 489–494. https://ajindex.com/articles/424082

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Hurria A, Kris MG. Management of lung cancer in older adults. CA Cancer J Clin 2003;53:325-41.
  2. Heerdt PM, Park BJ. The emerging role of minimally invasive surgical techniques for the treatment of lung malignancy in the elderly. Thorac Surg Clin 2009;19:345-51.
  3. Matsuoka H, Okada M, Sakamoto T, Tsubota N. Complications and outcomes after pulmonary resection for cancer in patients 80 to 89 years of age. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005;28:380-3.
  4. Naunheim KS, Kesler KA, D'Orazio SA, Fiore AC, Judd DR. Lung cancer surgery in the octogenarian. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1994;8:453-6.
  5. Port JL, Kent M, Korst RJ, Lee PC, Levin MA, Flieder D, et al. Surgical resection for lung cancer in the octogenarian. Chest 2004;126:733-8.
  6. Brock MV, Kim MP, Hooker CM, Alberg AJ, Jordan MM, Roig CM, et al. Pulmonary resection in octogenarians with stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer: a 22-year experience. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77:271-7.
  7. Ito H, Nakayama H, Yamada K, Yokose T, Masuda M. Outcomes of lobectomy in 'active' octogenarians with clinical stage I non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015;21:24-30.
  8. Okami J, Higashiyama M, Asamura H, Goya T, Koshiishi Y, Sohara Y, et al. Pulmonary resection in patients aged 80 years or over with clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer: prognostic factors for overall survival and risk factors for postoperative complications. J Thorac Oncol 2009;4:1247-53.
  9. Pagni S, Federico JA, Ponn RB. Pulmonary resection for lung cancer in octogenarians. Ann Thorac Surg 1994;57:188-93.
  10. Mun M, Kohno T. Video-assisted thoracic surgery for clinical stage I lung cancer in octogenarians. Ann Thorac Surg 2008;85:406-11.
  11. McVay CL, Pickens A, Fuller C, Houck W, McKenna R Jr. VATS anatomic pulmonary resection in octogenarians. Am Surg 2005;71:791-3.
  12. Dylewski MR, Ohaeto AC, Pereira JF. Pulmonary resection using a total endoscopic robotic video-assisted approach. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011;23:36-42.
  13. Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS, Skylizard L, Minnich DJ. Initial consecutive experience of completely portal robotic pulmonary resection with 4 arms. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011;142:740-6.
  14. Park BJ, Melfi F, Mussi A, Maisonneuve P, Spaggiari L, Da Silva RK, et al. Robotic lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): long-term oncologic results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012;143:383-9.
  15. Melfi FM, Menconi GF, Mariani AM, Angeletti CA. Early experience with robotic technology for thoracoscopic surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002;21:864-8.
  16. Breyer RH, Zippe C, P