Journals / Eurasian Journal of Medicine / 2015 / Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 1

Çocukluk Dönemi Kronotip Anketi'nin Türkçe Geçerlilik ve Güvenilirliği

Turkish Validation and Adaptation of Children 's Chronotype Questionnaire (CCTQ)

Pages
56–61
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The Turkish version of CCTQ has been found to be valid and reliable in Turkish children.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Chronotype refers to the time of the day that a person's physical and cognitive functions are active.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The CCTQ (Children's Chronotype Questionnaire) is a parentreport, 27-item mixed format questionnaire measuring chronotype of children in multiple domains : the midsleep point on free days (MSF), a morningness/eveningness scale(M/E) score, and a five-point chronotype (CT) score.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The Turkish version of CCTQ has been found to be valid and reliable in Turkish children.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Chronotype refers to the time of the day that a person's physical and cognitive functions are active. Simply this is a circadian phase preference of a person. While some of the people are morning active (so called larks ) others are more active at nights (The owls). The study of circadian rhythms, known as chronobiology, is all about the metabolic and psychiatric differences between people who have different chronotypes. A few tests are used to determine chronotypes. The CCTQ (Children's Chronotype Questionnaire) is a parentreport, 27-item mixed format questionnaire measuring chronotype of children in multiple domains : the midsleep point on free days (MSF), a morningness/eveningness scale(M/E) score, and a five-point chronotype (CT) score. The aim of this study is adapting Children's Chronotype Questionnaire (CCTQ) into Turkish language and validating the instrument in Turkish population. Materials and Methods: 101 children aged nine through eighteen constitude the sample of the study. The sample was composed of clinical (n=51) and community groups (n=50). CCTQ and Morningness Eveningness Scale for Children (MESC) questionnaires were applied to children and parents, then the CCTQ and MESC scores were compared to examine the validity of CCTQ. Results: The internal consistency and external validity of the Turkish CCTQ was sufficient to compare MESC-Turkish. As a result of this research carried out in accordance with methodological research principles, correlation between the M/E scores of CCTQ and MESC was significant. Conclusion: The Turkish version of CCTQ has been found to be valid and reliable in Turkish children.

Özet

Amaç: Kronotip, kişinin fiziksel ve bilişsel olarak günün aktif olduğu dönemini ifade eder. Basitçe kişinin sirkadiyan döngü seçimidir. Kronobiyoloji olarak bilinen sirkadiyen faz çalışmalarını, kronotipler arasındaki farkları ortaya koyar: Güvercinler (Sabahçılar) ve Baykuşlar (Akşamcılar). Kronotipleri belirlemek için mevcut birkaç test kullanılmaktadır. ÇDKA (Çocukluk Dönemi Kronotip Anketi), aile tarafından doldurulan, karışık formatta 27 sorudan oluşan, bir çok alanı sorgulayan, çocukların kronotipini belirlemeye yardımcı olan bir formdur. Boş günlerdeki ortalama uyku miktarını (MSF), Sabahlık/Akşamlık skorunu (M/E) ve kronotip skorunu (CT) belirler. Bu araştırmanın amacı Çocukluk Dönemi Kronotip Anketini Türkçe'ye uyarlamak ve Türk popülasyonuna geçerli bir materyal kazandırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmanın örneklemini yaşları dokuz ve onsekiz arasında değişen 101 çocuk oluşturdu. Örneklem klinik (n=51) ve toplum grubu (n=50) olmak üzere iki gruptan meydana geldi. ÇDKA ve MESC (Çocuklara Yönelik Günlük Ritim Belirleme Ölçeği) anketleri çocuklara ve ebeveynlerine uygulandı, sonrasında ÇDKA'nın geçerliliğini test etmek için ÇDKA ve MESC skorları karşılaştırıldı.Bulgular: Türkçe ÇDKA'nın iç tutarlılığı ve dış geçerliliği, MESCTürkçe'yle karşılaştırılıdığında yeterli seviyedeydi. Çalışmamızda ÇDKA ve MESC formları sonucu elde edilen M/E skorlarının korelasyonu anlamlı olarak saptandı.Sonuç: Türkçe ÇDKA'nın Türk çocukları için geçerli ve güvenilir bir anket olduğu saptanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

DURSUN, O. B., ESİN, I. S., OGUTLU, H. (2022). Çocukluk Dönemi Kronotip Anketi'nin Türkçe Geçerlilik ve Güvenilirliği. Eurasian Journal of Medicine, Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 1, 56–61. https://ajindex.com/articles/509424

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Kerkhof GA, Lancel M. EEG slow wave activity, REM sleep, and rectal temperature during night and day sleep in morning- type and evening-type subjects. Psychophysiology 1991; 28: 678-88. [CrossRef] Wolfson AR, Carskadon MA. Sleep schedules and daytime function- ing in adolescents. Child development 1998; 69: 875-87. [CrossRef] Tankova I, Adan A, Buela-Casal G. Circadian typology and individual differences. A review. Personality and Individual Differences 1994; 16: 671-84. [CrossRef] Friedrich Cofer L, Grice JP, Sethre-Hofstad L, et al. Developmental perspectives on morningness-eveningness and social interac- tions. Human Development. 1999; 42: 169-98. [CrossRef] Werner H, Lebourgeois MK, Geiger A, Jenni OG. Assessment of chronotype in four- to eleven-year-old children: Reliability and validity of the children's chronotype questionnaire (CCTQ). Chronobiol Int 2009; 26: 992-1014. [CrossRef] Randler C. Psychometric properties of the German version of the composite scale of morningness. Biological Rhythm Research 2008; 39: 151-61. [CrossRef] Randler C. Morningness-eveningness comparison in adoles- cents from different countries around the world. Chronobiol Int 2008; 25: 1017-28. [CrossRef] Carskadon MA, Vieira C, Acebo C. Association between puberty and delayed phase preference. Sleep 1993; 16: 258-62.
  2. Russo PM, Bruni O, Lucidi F, Ferri R, Violani C. Sleep habits and circadian preference in Italian children and adolescents. J Sleep Res 2007; 16: 163-9. [CrossRef] Randler C, Bilger S. Associations among sleep, chronotype, parental monitoring, and pubertal development among German adolescents. J Psychol 2009; 143: 509-20. [CrossRef] Roenneberg T, Kuehnle T, Pramstaller PP, et al. A marker for the end of adolescence. Curr Biol 2004; 14: R1038-R9. [CrossRef] Korczak A, Martynhak B, Pedrazzoli M, Brito A, Louzada F. Influence of chronotype and social zeitgebers on sleep/wake patterns. Braz J Med Biol Res 2008; 41: 914-9. [CrossRef] Merikanto I, Lahti T, Puolijoki H, et al. Associations of chronotype and sleep with cardiovascular diseases and type 2 diabetes. Chronobiol Int 2013; 30: 470-7. [CrossRef] Kantermann T, Theadom A, Roenneberg T, Cropley M. Fibromyalgia syndrome and chronotype late chronotypes are more affected. J Biol Rhythms 2012; 27: 176-9. [CrossRef] Giannotti F, Cortesi F, Sebastiani T, Ottaviano S. Circadian prefer- ence, sleep and daytime behaviour in adolescence. J Sleep Res 2002; 11: 191-9. [CrossRef] Adan A, Prat G, Sánchez-Turet M. Effects of nic