Journals / Eurasian Journal of Medicine / 2014 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 2

Metabolik sendromda torasik aort çapları ile non-dipper kan basıncı arasında ilişki

The relationship between non-dipper blood pressure and thoracic aortic diameter in metabolic syndrome

Pages
120–125
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Non-dipper hypertensive patients had a higher thoracic aortic diameter value than dipper patients (35.6±2.4 and 33.23±1.1, p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Non-dipper hypertension is associated with increasedcardiovascular morbidity and mortality.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The purpose of this studywas to evaluate the association of non-dipping hypertension withaortic diameter in patients with metabolic syndrome.Materials and Methods: This study included 70 hypertensive patients with metabolic syndrome.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Non-dipper hypertensive patients had a higher thoracic aortic diameter value than dipper patients (35.6±2.4 and 33.23±1.1, p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Non-dipper hypertension is associated with increasedcardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this studywas to evaluate the association of non-dipping hypertension withaortic diameter in patients with metabolic syndrome.Materials and Methods: This study included 70 hypertensive patients with metabolic syndrome. These patients were evaluated with24-h blood pressure Holter monitoring and divided into two groupsof 35 patients each. Aortic diameter was measured by M-mode andtwo-dimensional echocardiography. These parameters were com-pared between the two groups.Results: In the dipper group, there were 26 female and 9 male patients with a mean age of 55±11 years. In the non-dipper group, there were 25 female and 10 male patients with a mean age of 56±11 years. No significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of basic characteristics. Non-dipper hypertensive patients had a higher thoracic aortic diameter value than dipper patients (35.6±2.4 and 33.23±1.1, p

Özet

Amaç: Non-dipper hipertansiyon artmış kardiyovasküler mortalite ve morbidite ile ilişkilidir. Bu çalışmanın amacı metabolik sendromlu hastalarda aort çapı ile non-dipping hipertansiyon ilişkisini değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya metabolik sendromlu 70 hipertansif hasta alındı. Bu hastaların 24 saat kan basıncı ölçümü holter ile değerlendirildi ve herbirinde 35 hasta olan iki gruba ayrıldı. Aort çapları M mod ve iki boyutlu ekokardiyografi ile değerlendirildi. Bu paramatreler iki gurup arasında karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Dipper gurupta yaş ortalaması 55±11 yıl olan 26 kadın, 9 erkek hasta vardı. Non-dipper gurupta yaş ortalaması 56±11 yıl olan 25 kadın, 10 erkek hasta vardı. Temel özellikler açısından iki gurup arasında anlamlı farklılık yoktu. Non-dipper gurupta torasik aort çapları dipper guruba göre yüksekti (35.6±2.4 and 33.23±1.1, p

🔖

Cite This Article

TENEKECİOGLU, E., VATANSEVER, F., KARAAGAC, K., ARİCAN, O. O., KUZEYTEMİZ, M., TOPAL, D., YILMAZ, M. (2022). Metabolik sendromda torasik aort çapları ile non-dipper kan basıncı arasında ilişki. Eurasian Journal of Medicine, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 2, 120–125. https://ajindex.com/articles/509166

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; National High Blood Pressure Education Program Coordinating Committee. Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension 2003; 42: 1206-52. [CrossRef] 2. Chughtai IS, Peixoto AJ. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: A review of its clinical and prognostic relevance. Hosp Physician 2003; 39: 47-56. 3. Tsioufis C, Antoniadis D, Stefanadis C, et al. Relationships between new risk factors and circadian blood pressure variation in untreated subjects with essential hypertension. Am J Hypertens 2002; 15: 600-4. [CrossRef] 4. Cicconetti P, Morelli S, Ottaviani L, et al. Blunted nocturnal fall in blood pressure and left ventricular mass in elderly individuals with recently diagnosed isolated systolic hypertension. Am J Hypertens 2003; 16: 900-5. [CrossRef] 5. Pickering T. Recommendations for the use of home (self ) and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. American Society of Hypertension Ad Hoc Panel. Am J Hypertens 1996; 9: 1-11. [CrossRef] 6. Staessen JA, Thijs L, Fagard R, et al. Predicting cardiovascular riskusing conventional vs ambulatory blood pres- sure in older patients withsystolic hypertension: Systolic Hypertension in Europe Trial Investigators. JAMA 1999; 282: 539-46. [CrossRef] 7. Kuzeytemiz M, Karaagac K, Vatansever F, et al.The Effect of Non-dipper and Dipper Blood Pressure Patterns on Aortic Elasticity in Patients with Metabolic Syndrome. Clin Exp Hypertens 2013 Apr 3. [Epub ahead of print] [CrossRef] 8. Demir M, Uyan U, Melek M. The relationship between vitamin D deficiency and thoracic aortic dilatation. Vasa 2012; 41: 419-24. [CrossRef] 9. Mancia G, De Backer G, Dominiczak A, 2007 Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: The Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH). Eur Heart J 2007; 28: 1462-536. 10. American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1989; 2: 358-67. [CrossRef] 11. Sahn D, DeMaria A, Kisslo J, et al. Recommendations regarding quantifi cation in M-mode echocardiography: results of a survey of echocardiographic measurements. Circulation 1978; 58: 1072-83. [CrossRef