Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate different determinants of the patient's psychosocial functioning that might possibly affect the outcome of rhinoplastic surgery.Materials and Methods: Forty-one patients undergoing rhinoplasty, consecutively admitted to and operated upon at the Department of Otolaryngology, Erzurum Regional Training and Research Hospital, Turkey, were studied with regard to their psychological characteristics.Results: In the patient group, Liebowitz anxiety, Liebowitz/ avoidance, and Liebowitz/total scores were significantly higher than the control group (p
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate different determinants of the patient's psychosocial functioning that might possibly affect the outcome of rhinoplastic surgery.Materials and Methods: Forty-one patients undergoing rhinoplasty, consecutively admitted to and operated upon at the Department of Otolaryngology, Erzurum Regional Training and Research Hospital, Turkey, were studied with regard to their psychological characteristics.Results: In the patient group, Liebowitz anxiety, Liebowitz/ avoidance, and Liebowitz/total scores were significantly higher than the control group (p
📊
Key Findings & Data:Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate different determinants of the patient's psychosocial functioning that might possibly affect the outcome of rhinoplastic surgery.Materials and Methods: Forty-one patients undergoing rhinoplasty, consecutively admitted to and operated upon at the Department of Otolaryngology, Erzurum Regional Training and Research Hospital, Turkey, were studied with regard to their psychological characteristics.Results: In the patient group, Liebowitz anxiety, Liebowitz/ avoidance, and Liebowitz/total scores were significantly higher than the control group (p
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate different determinants of the patient's psychosocial functioning that might possibly affect the outcome of rhinoplastic surgery.Materials and Methods: Forty-one patients undergoing rhinoplasty, consecutively admitted to and operated upon at the Department of Otolaryngology, Erzurum Regional Training and Research Hospital, Turkey, were studied with regard to their psychological characteristics.Results: In the patient group, Liebowitz anxiety, Liebowitz/ avoidance, and Liebowitz/total scores were significantly higher than the control group (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate different determinants of the patient's psychosocial functioning that might possibly affect the outcome of rhinoplastic surgery.Materials and Methods: Forty-one patients undergoing rhinoplasty, consecutively admitted to and operated upon at the Department of Otolaryngology, Erzurum Regional Training and Research Hospital, Turkey, were studied with regard to their psychological characteristics.Results: In the patient group, Liebowitz anxiety, Liebowitz/ avoidance, and Liebowitz/total scores were significantly higher than the control group (p
Özet
Amaç: Çalısmanın amacı; rinoplasti operasyonunun başarısını da etkileyebilecek olan, hastalara ait psikososyal faktörlerin değerlendirilmesidir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışmada; Erzurum Bölge Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Kulak Burun Boğaz Kliniği'ne rinoplasti olmak amacıyla başvuran ve rinoplasti operasyonu yapılan 41 hastanın psikolojik alt yapıları incelendi. Bulgular: Hasta grubunda; Liebowitz kaygı, Liebowitz kaçınma ve Liebowitz toplam skorları yüksek bulundu (p
🔖
Cite This Article
OZTURK, A., KAYA, Z., DEVECİ, E., KUDUBAN, O., OZBAY, I., GOZELER, M. S., KUCUR, C., SİMSEK, E. (2022). Psychological Evaluation of Patients Seeking Rhinoplasty. Eurasian Journal of Medicine, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 2, 102–106. https://ajindex.com/articles/509042
Hern J, Hamann J, Tostevin P, Rowe-Jones J, Hinton A. Assessing psychological morbidity in patients with nasal deformity using the CORE questionnaire. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2002; 27: 359-64. [CrossRef] 2. Bull R, Rumsey N. The social Psychology of Facial Appearance. Springer: New York, 1988. [CrossRef] 3. Andretto Amodeo C. The central role of the nose in the face and the psyche: review of the nose and the psyche. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2007; 31: 406-10. [CrossRef] 4. Haraldsson P. Psychosocial impact of cosmetic rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1999; 23: 170-4. [CrossRef] 5. Johnston M, Carpenter L. Relationship between pre-operative anxiety and post-operative state. Psychol Med 1980; 10: 361-7. [CrossRef] 6. Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Page GG, Marucha PT, MacCallum RC, Glaser R. Psychological influences on surgical recovery. Perspectives from psychoneuroimmunology. Am Psychol 1998; 53: 1209-18. [CrossRef] 7. Aydemir O, Guvenir T, Kuey L, Kultur S. "Validity and reliability of Turkish version of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale." Turk PsikiyatriDerg 1997; 8: 280-7. 8. Soykan C, Özguven HD, Gençöz T. Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale: the Turkish version. Psychol Rep 2003; 93: 1059-69. [CrossRef] 9. Koçyiğit H, Aydemir Ö, Ölmez N, Memi A. Kısa Form-36 (KF- 36)'nınTürkçe versiyonunun güvenilirliği ve geçerliliği. İlaç ve Tedavi Dergisi 1999; 12: 102-6. 10. Çuhadaroğlu, F. Adolesanlarda Benlik Saygısı. UzmanlıkTezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Psikiyatri Anabilim Dalı, Ankara. 1986. 11. American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. Cosmetic Surgery National Data Bank-2012 Statistics. New York: American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2013. 12. Ritvo EC, Melnick I, Marcus GR, Glick ID. Psychiatric conditions in cosmetic surgery patients. Facial Plast Surg 2006; 22: 194-7. [CrossRef 13. Rankin M, Borah GL, Perry AW, Wey PD. Quality-of-life outcomes after cosmetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998: 102: 2139-45. [CrossRef] 14. Fatemi MJ, Seyed FR, Moosavi J, Soltani M. Quality of life among Iranian adults before and after rhinoplasty. Aesth Plast Surg 2012; 36: 448-52. [CrossRef] 15. Honigman RJ, Phillips KA, Castle DJ. A review of psychosocial outcomes for patients seeking cosmetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 113: 1229-37. [CrossRef] 16. American Psychiatric Association. DSM 5. American Psychiatric Association, 2013. 17. Castle DJ, Honigman RJ, Phillips KA. Does cosmetic surgery improve psychosocial wellbeing? Med J Aust 2002; 176: