Journals / Eurasian Journal of Medicine / 2021 / Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 1

Preprocedural Ultrasonography Versus Landmark-Guided Spinal Anesthesia in Geriatric Patients with Difficult Anatomy: A Prospective Randomized Trial

Pages
9–14
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

No statistically significant difference was found between thegroups regarding total procedure time, pain scores, patient satisfaction scores, and spinal anesthesia-inducedcomplications (p>0.05).Conclusion: Our study findings showed that preprocedural neuroaxial USG improves technical performanceof spinal anesthesia in elderly patients with difficult anatomy

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study was aimed to determine whether preprocedural ultrasonography (USG) affects thetechnical performance of spinal anesthesia in elderly patients with difficulty in palpating landmarks, scoliosis,or previous spine surgery.Materials and Methods: This prospective study was conducted in 156 elderly patients scheduled for electiveorthopedic lower extremity surgery.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The patients were randomly divided into 2 groups to receive spinalanesthesia by the preprocedural USG examination (group U) or conventional landmark palpation technique(group P).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:No statistically significant difference was found between thegroups regarding total procedure time, pain scores, patient satisfaction scores, and spinal anesthesia-inducedcomplications (p>0.05).Conclusion: Our study findings showed that preprocedural neuroaxial USG improves technical performanceof spinal anesthesia in elderly patients with difficult anatomy
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: This study was aimed to determine whether preprocedural ultrasonography (USG) affects thetechnical performance of spinal anesthesia in elderly patients with difficulty in palpating landmarks, scoliosis,or previous spine surgery.Materials and Methods: This prospective study was conducted in 156 elderly patients scheduled for electiveorthopedic lower extremity surgery. The patients were randomly divided into 2 groups to receive spinalanesthesia by the preprocedural USG examination (group U) or conventional landmark palpation technique(group P). The primary finding of our study was the rate of successful access to the subarachnoid space oninitial needle insertion attempt. Secondary achievements included number of needle insertion attempts,number of needle redirections, total procedure time, needle pain scores, patient satisfaction, and complications of spinal anesthesia.Results: The rate of successful access to the subarachnoid space at the first needle insertion attempt was significantly higher in group U than in group P (74.4% vs 53.8%, p=0.008). Medians (interquartile range) of bothneedle insertion attempts (group P, 2 [1-3] vs group U, 1 [1-2]; p=0.038) and needle redirections (group P,3 [2-5] vs group U, 2 [1-4]; p=0.028), requiring to achieve dural puncture, were significantly higher amongthe patients in group P than those in group U. No statistically significant difference was found between thegroups regarding total procedure time, pain scores, patient satisfaction scores, and spinal anesthesia-inducedcomplications (p>0.05).Conclusion: Our study findings showed that preprocedural neuroaxial USG improves technical performanceof spinal anesthesia in elderly patients with difficult anatomy

🔖

Cite This Article

KILIÇASLAN, A., ÜYEL, Y. (2022). Preprocedural Ultrasonography Versus Landmark-Guided Spinal Anesthesia in Geriatric Patients with Difficult Anatomy: A Prospective Randomized Trial. Eurasian Journal of Medicine, Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 1, 9–14. https://ajindex.com/articles/508853

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Scapinelli R. Morphological and functional changes of the lumbar spinous processes in the elderly. Surg Radiol Anat 1989; 11: 129-33
  2. Chin KJ. Recent developments in ultrasound imaging for neuraxial blockade. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2018; 31: 608-13
  3. Perlas A, Chaparro LE, Chin KJ. Lumbar neuraxial ultrasound for spinal and epidural anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2016; 41: 251-60
  4. Tessler MJ, Kardash K, Wahba RM, et al. The performance of spinal anesthesia is marginally more difficult in the elderly. Reg Anesth Pain Med 1999; 24: 126-30
  5. Sprung J, Bourke DL, Grass J, et al. Predicting the difficult neuraxial block: a prospective study. Anesth Analg 1999; 89: 384-9
  6. Zeidan A, Farhat O, Maaliki H, et al. Does postdural puncture headache left untreated lead to subdural hematoma? Case report and review of the literature. Int J Obstet Anesth 2006; 15: 50-8
  7. Vogt M, van Gerwen DJ, Lubbers W, et al. Optimal point of insertion and needle angle in neuraxial blockade using a midline approach: a study in computed tomography scans of adult patients. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2017; 42: 600-8
  8. Ranjini SS, Malarvizhi AC. Ultrasonographic guidance in the prediction of difficult spinal anaesthesia in older patients. J Evol Med Dent Sci 2014: 3; 8340-54
  9. Cook TM, Counsell D, Wildsmith JA. Royal College of Anaesthetists Third National Audit Project. Major complications of central neuraxial block: report on the Third National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists. Br J Anaesth 2009; 102: 179-90
  10. Lucas DN, Elton CD. Through a glass darkly - ultrasound imaging in obstetric anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 2016; 71: 617-22
  11. Chin A, Crooke B, Heywood L, Brijball R, Pelecanos AM, Abeypala W. A randomised controlled trial comparing needle movements during combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia with and without ultrasound assistance. Anaesthesia 2018; 73: 466-73
  12. Ansari T, Yousef A, El Gamassy A, et al. Ultrasound-guided spinal anaesthesia in obstetrics: is there an advantage over the landmark technique in patients with easily palpable spines? Int J Obstet Anesth 2014; 23: 213-16
  13. Lim YC, Choo CY, Tan KT. A randomised controlled trial of ultrasound assisted spinal anaesthesia. Anaesth Intensive Care 2014; 42: 191-98
  14. Turkstra TP, Marmai KL, Armstrong KP, Kumar K, Singh SI. Preprocedural ultrasound assessment does not improve trainee performance of spinal anesthesia for obstetrical patients: a randomi