SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation / 2019 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3

Analysis of Average Index Values of Mandible

Dilara PATAT
Demet ÜNALMIŞ
Seher YILMAZ
Adem TOKPINAR
Mustafa TAŞTAN
Hatice SUSAR
Şükrü ATEŞ
Muhammet DEĞERMENCİ
Pages
189–195
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The average length of the mandibular foramen to the deepest point of the mandibular notch was found to be20.39 mm on the right and 19.90 mm on the left.Conclusion: Knowing the normal anatomic structure and morphometric values of the mandibular bone well mayavoid any possible complications during operations in this area.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: Mandible is the only viscerocranium bone moving in the skull.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study is to determine the average index values of the mandible and to contribute to theliterature.Methods: This study was carried out using digital calipers with a sensitivity of 0.01 millimeter (mm) on 15 mandibulardry bone specimens in Anatomy Department of Erciyes University.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The average length of the mandibular foramen to the deepest point of the mandibular notch was found to be20.39 mm on the right and 19.90 mm on the left.Conclusion: Knowing the normal anatomic structure and morphometric values of the mandibular bone well mayavoid any possible complications during operations in this area.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: Mandible is the only viscerocranium bone moving in the skull. Mandible is active in speech and chewingfunctions; important bone for many areas such as anatomy, dentistry, anthropology, plastic and reconstructive surgery,jaw surgery. The aim of this study is to determine the average index values of the mandible and to contribute to theliterature.Methods: This study was carried out using digital calipers with a sensitivity of 0.01 millimeter (mm) on 15 mandibulardry bone specimens in Anatomy Department of Erciyes University. Age and gender were not diffrentiated in dry bonesamples. Measurements were made on the mandible, mainly on the location of the mental foramen and mandibularforamen, and on the other 20 reference points of the mandible.Results: In our study, there was no statistically signifiant diffrence when bilateral mandible data were compared(p>0.05). The average length of the mandibular foramen to the deepest point of the mandibular notch was found to be20.39 mm on the right and 19.90 mm on the left.Conclusion: Knowing the normal anatomic structure and morphometric values of the mandibular bone well mayavoid any possible complications during operations in this area.

🔖

Cite This Article

PATAT, D., ÜNALMIŞ, D., YILMAZ, S., TOKPINAR, A., TAŞTAN, M., SUSAR, H., ATEŞ, Ş., DEĞERMENCİ, M. (2022). Analysis of Average Index Values of Mandible. Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3, 189–195. https://ajindex.com/articles/508759

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Arıncı K, Elhan A. Anatomy, Volume 1, Güneş Bookstore, Ankara, 2006: pp. 58–63,124–6
  2. Uysal İ, Büyükmumcu M, Karabulut AK, Şeker M. Investigation of the development of mandible in human fetuses with morphometric and angular measurements. SÜ Medical Faculty Derg 2003;19:129–35
  3. Şahinoğlu K. (Translation editor). Moore KL, Dalley AF. Anatomy for Clinic
  4. Printing. Nobel Medical Bookstore
  5. Odar IV. Anatomy Textbook. Ankara: Elif Matbaacilik.1980; 254–6
  6. Grass A. Anatomy. The 5th Ed. Bursa: Uludag Univ. Printing House, 1995;27–9
  7. Sankar DK, Bhanu SP, Susan PJ. Morphometrical and morphological study of mental foramen. Indian J Dent Res 2011;22:542–546. [CrossRef] 7. Ülger M. Principles of orthodontic treatment. The 5th Ed. Ankara: 1999;1 –39
  8. Watanabe H, Abdul MM, Kurabayashi T, Aoki H. Mandible for your dental implant operation. Surg Radiol Anat 2010;32:343–9
  9. Snell R. S. (2011). Clinical Neuroanatomy. Nobel Printing
  10. Greenstein G, Tarnow D. The mental foramen and nerve: A literature review. J Periodontol 2006;77:1933–43. [CrossRef] 11. Cavalcanti MGP, Ruprecht A, Vannier MW. 3D rendering. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 2002;31:218–23. [CrossRef] 12. Bou Serhal C, Jacobs R, Flygare L, Quirynen M, Van Steenberghe D. Perioperative validation of the mental foramen of localization. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002;31:39–43. [CrossRef] 13. Rastogi R, Budhiraja V, Sathpathi DK, Singh S, Gour KK, Nair S. Morphology and morphometry of the mental foramen in the dry human body. Eur J Anat 2012;16:22–6
  11. Rouas P, Nancy J, Bar D. Identifiation of double mandibular canals with CT scans and cone beam CT. Dentomax illofac Radiol 2007;36:34–8. [CrossRef] 15. Sarısoy LT, Güngör K. Evaluation of gonial angle in panaromic radiographs. GU Faculty of Dentistry 2018;133–6
  12. Xie QF, Ainamo A. Correlation of the cortical thickness, height of the mandibular residual body, and duration of edentulism. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:477–82. [CrossRef] 17. Al-shamout R, Ammoush M, Alrbata R, Al-habahbah. Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal 2012;32:81 –7
  13. Aksu F, Zeybek G, Aksu E, Ozcan E, Diagonal N, Alibeyoglu A. M. Localization and Morphometry of the Foramen Mandibulae. Journal of DEU Faculty of Medicine 2007;21:131 –5
  14. Salbacak A, Büyükmumcu M, Karabulut AK, Ziylan T, Ülger H. İnsanlarda foramen mentale’nin pozisyonu üzerine morfolojik çalışma. Morfoloji Dergisi 1993;2:7–13
  15. Kökten G, Büyükertan M, Balcıoğlu H. Foramen mentale’nin çap ve lokalizasyonunun ku