Journals / Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation / 2019 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

Nosocomial Enterococcal Bacteremia:Predictors of Resistance and Mortality

Pages
119–126
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Interestingly, mortality in gentamicin-sensitive cases is significantly lower.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This study aims to identify the risk factors associated with 14-day mortality in nosocomial Enterococcibacteremia.Methods: This retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary training hospital.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients aged 16 or older, with nosoco-mial bacteremia due to Enterococci between January 2012 and January 2018 were included.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Interestingly, mortality in gentamicin-sensitive cases is significantly lower.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to identify the risk factors associated with 14-day mortality in nosocomial Enterococcibacteremia.Methods: This retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary training hospital. Patients aged 16 or older, with nosoco-mial bacteremia due to Enterococci between January 2012 and January 2018 were included. Analyses were performed using SPSS version 21. Pearson’s chi-square, and Fisher’s Exact tests were used for the comparison of categorical data. Parameters found to be statistically significant in univariate analyses were further tested with multivariate logistic re-gression to predict the risk of mortality. Statistical significance is interpreted as p-values lower than 0.05.Results: The mean age in our study was 64.82±16.76. Patients were diagnosed in intensive care unit (44%), internal medicine wards (41.3%) or surgical wards (14.7%). Reasons of admittance included medical problems (52.7%), surgery (14.1%), cerebrovascular occlusion (12.5%), burns (7.1%) and community acquired infections (6.5%). We found that increase in both Charlson and Pitt bacteremia scores; the presence of neutropenia, severe sepsis, septic shock, or other concurrent infections significantly increased the risk of death. Gentamicin sensitivity yielded more favorable therapeu-tic outcomes regarding mortality.Conclusion: Mortality is higher in patients with higher Charlson comorbidity indices and Pitt bacteremia scores, in neutropenic cases, and patients with concomitant infections and sepsis. Interestingly, mortality in gentamicin-sensitive cases is significantly lower.

🔖

Cite This Article

CALİK, S., TOSUN, S., ARİ, A., OKUR, O., YİS, R. (2022). Nosocomial Enterococcal Bacteremia:Predictors of Resistance and Mortality. Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 119–126. https://ajindex.com/articles/508742

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Ceci M, Delpech G, Sparo M, Mezzina V, Sánchez BS, Baldaccini B. Clinical and microbiological features of bacteremia caused by Enterococcus faecalis. J Infect Dev Ctries 2015;9:1195–203
  2. Zheng JX, Li H, Pu ZY, Wang HY, Deng XB, Liu XJ, et al. Blood-stream infections caused by Enterococcus spp: A 10-year ret-rospective analysis at a tertiary hospital in China. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci 2017;37:257–26 3. McBride SJ, Upton A, Roberts SA. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with vancomycin-susceptible Entero-coccus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium bacteraemia—a five-year retrospective review. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2010;29:107–14
  3. Pinholt M, Ostergaard C, Arpi M, Bruun NE, Schønheyder HC, Gradel KO, et al. Incidence, clinical characteristics and 30-day mortality of enterococcal bacteraemia in Denmark 2006-2009: a population-based cohort study. Clin Microbiol Infect 2014;20:145–51
  4. Chuang YC, Chen PY, Lin CY, Chen YC, Wang JT, Chang SC. A retrospective clinical comparison of daptomycin vs dapto-mycin and a beta-lactam antibiotic for treating vancomycin resistant Enterococcus faecium bloodstream infections. Sci Rep 2018;8:1632
  5. Johnstone J, Chen C, Rosella L, Adomako K, Policarpio ME, Lam F, et al. Patient- and hospital-level predictors of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) bacteremia in Ontario, Canada. Am J Infect Control 2018;46:1266–71
  6. Turkish Republic Health Instution Department of Infectious Diseases. Bacteria distribution and antibiotic resistance sur-veillance report for national healthcare-associated infections 2017. Available from: https://infline.saglik.gov.tr/ Accessed 25 February 2019
  7. Kara A, Devrim İ, Bayram N, Katipoğlu N, Kıran E, Oruç Y, et al. Risk of vancomycin-resistant enterococci bloodstream in-fection among patients colonized with vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Braz J Infect Dis 2015;19:58–61
  8. Atalay S, Ece G, Samlıoğlu P, Maraş G, Köse I, Köse S. Evaluation of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus cases at a tertiary level hospital in Izmir,Turkey. Mikrobiyol Bul 2012;46:553–9
  9. Gedik H, Yıldırmak T, Simşek F, Kantürk A, Arıca D, Aydın D, et al.Vancomycin-resistant enterococci colonization and bac-teremia in patients with hematological malignancies. J Infect Dev Ctries 2014;8:1113–8
  10. Kilbas I, Ciftci IH. Antimicrobial resistance of Enterococcus isolates in Turkey: A meta-analysis of current studies. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 2018;12:26–30 12. Roth JA, Tschudin-Sutter