Journals / Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation / 2020 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 4

Birth Preferences of Health Professionals in Eastern Turkey: Cesarean Section Rates Still on the Rise: A Cross-Sectional Study

Pages
433–441
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The even higher CS rates among medical doctors suggest that although education campaigns might be usefulto reduce this risky health behavior, more radical steps need to be taken, including economic measures and policychanges,preferably the legislation by the state.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The incidence rates of primary Cesarean section (CS) delivery in Turkey have jumped from 21.2% in 2003 to53.1% in 2016, exceeding by over thrice the maximum 15% recommended 30 years ago by the WHO.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aims at determiningthe Turkish health personnel’s preferred types of birth, the reasons, and the factors associated with their preferences.Methods: Randomly selected from a total eligible population of 2032 female healthcare, the workers were activelyemployed during the study time in Erzurum, 450 women were surveyed in their work settings througha a 23-item structured questionnaire.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The even higher CS rates among medical doctors suggest that although education campaigns might be usefulto reduce this risky health behavior, more radical steps need to be taken, including economic measures and policychanges,preferably the legislation by the state.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2003 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: The incidence rates of primary Cesarean section (CS) delivery in Turkey have jumped from 21.2% in 2003 to53.1% in 2016, exceeding by over thrice the maximum 15% recommended 30 years ago by the WHO. While this trendhas been partly attributed to maternal request, few studies have actually examined the delivery preferences of women.Even fewer studies have focused on health professionals as a parturient subpopulation. This study aims at determiningthe Turkish health personnel’s preferred types of birth, the reasons, and the factors associated with their preferences.Methods: Randomly selected from a total eligible population of 2032 female healthcare, the workers were activelyemployed during the study time in Erzurum, 450 women were surveyed in their work settings througha a 23-item structured questionnaire. Data for 412 women was analyzed using Student's T-test, Pearson’s Chi-Square test, and LogisticRegression analysis.Results: The participants gave birth to a total of 568 live deliveries, of which 331 (58.3%) were by CS. Out of the 288women who gave birth to a baby, 197 (68.4%) experienced at least one CS delivery. Medical doctors had the highestCS rates 85.5% (n=47), followed by academic staff 73.0% (n=27), paramedics, 72.2% (n=13), nurses 66.3% (n=53), andmidwives 58.2% (n=57) (Chi-Square=12.804, p=0.012). Of the participants, 165 (57.2%) had an antenatal visit to secondary care hospitals, while only 46 women (15.9%) visited their family physician.Conclusion: Compared to the general population, Cesarean deliveries are more common among Turkish health professionals. The even higher CS rates among medical doctors suggest that although education campaigns might be usefulto reduce this risky health behavior, more radical steps need to be taken, including economic measures and policychanges,preferably the legislation by the state.

🔖

Cite This Article

CALIKOĞLU, E. O., YERLİ, E. B., KADIOĞLU, B. G. (2022). Birth Preferences of Health Professionals in Eastern Turkey: Cesarean Section Rates Still on the Rise: A Cross-Sectional Study. Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 4, 433–441. https://ajindex.com/articles/508700

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Robson SJ, de Costa CM. Thirty years of the World Health Organization's target caesarean section rate: time to move on. Med J Aust 2017;206:181–5
  2. Sherrod MM. The History of Cesarean Birth From 1900 to 2016. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2017;46:628–36
  3. Ko SY, Park SW, Sohn IS, Lee JY, Kwon HS, Hwang HS, et al. Interventional management for complications following caesarean section. Br J Radiol 2011;84:204–9
  4. Boatin AA, Schlotheuber A, Betran AP, Moller AB, Barros AJD, Boerma T, et al, Hosseinpoor AR. Within country inequalities in caesarean section rates: observational study of 72 low and middle income countries. BMJ 2018;360:k55
  5. Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Zhang J, Gülmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The Increasing Trend in Caesarean Section Rates: Global, Regional and National Estimates: 1990-2014. PLoS One 2016;11:e0148343
  6. Koc I. Increased cesarean section rates in Turkey. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2003;8:1–10
  7. Turkey Demographic and Health Survey 2008. Ankara: 2008. Available at: http://www.hips.hacettepe.edu.tr/eng/tdhs08/ TDHS-2008_Preliminary_Report.pdf. Accessed Jun 02, 2018
  8. Turkey Demographic and Health Survey 2013. Ankara: 2013. Available at: https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR352/ FR352.pdf. Accessed Jun 2, 2018
  9. Köse MR, Başara BB, Güler C, Çağlar İS, Özdemir TA, Aygün A, et al. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Health. Health Statistics Yearbook 2016. Ankara: 2017. Available at: https://dosyasb. saglik.gov.tr/Eklenti/13183,sy2016turkcepdf.pdf?0. Accessed Sep 29, 2020
  10. Göksal E. What Do Obstetricians and Gynecologists and Pediatricians Think About Cesarean Delivery Rates? Bursa Example. Bursa: Uludağ University Medical Faculty; 2017. 11. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP; STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. PLoS Med 2007;4:e296
  11. Başara BB, Güler C, Soytutan İ, Aygün A, Özdemir TA. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Health Health Statistics Yearbook 2015. Ankara: 2016. Available at: https://dosyasb.saglik.gov.tr/Eklen ti/6118,healthstatisticsyearbook2015pdf.pdf?0. Accessed Sep 29, 2020
  12. Angeja AC, Washington AE, Vargas JE, Gomez R, Rojas I, Caughey AB. Chilean women's preferences regarding mode of delivery: which do they prefer and why? BJOG 2006;113:1253–8
  13. Zhao Y, Chen S. Psychosocial factors for women requesting cesarean section. IJCM 2013;4:3