SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation / 2020 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

Assessing the Efficacy of Cryoadipolysis with the Cooltech® System: Case Study

Carlos Fajardo URDİALES
Luisa Ceres RUİZ
José M. Mellado SORİA
Mariano Vélez GONGALEZ
Gregorio Viera-MARMOL
Pages
126–133
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Ultrasound results showed a mean decrease of 15.34% (SD 13.32) in the abdomenarea and of 11.03% (SD 25.21) and 4.57% (SD 25.68) in the right and left flanks, respectively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this case study was to assess the efficacy of the Cooltech® system in a cryoadipolysis session for theremoval of localized subcutaneous adipose tissue.Prospective, single-center case study conducted at the Fajardo Clinic in Malaga (Spain).
📊
Key Findings & Data:All patients underwent onetreatment session in the abdomen and flanks with a Cooltech® cryoadipolysis machine (Cocoon Medical, Spain) andtwo follow-up visits at 4 and 8 weeks.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Ultrasound results showed a mean decrease of 15.34% (SD 13.32) in the abdomenarea and of 11.03% (SD 25.21) and 4.57% (SD 25.68) in the right and left flanks, respectively.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this case study was to assess the efficacy of the Cooltech® system in a cryoadipolysis session for theremoval of localized subcutaneous adipose tissue.Prospective, single-center case study conducted at the Fajardo Clinic in Malaga (Spain). All patients underwent onetreatment session in the abdomen and flanks with a Cooltech® cryoadipolysis machine (Cocoon Medical, Spain) andtwo follow-up visits at 4 and 8 weeks. A substudy was conducted, in which the left side of the abdomen and the rightflank were treated. Age, abdominal perimeter and thickness of adipose tissue were the variables analyzed throughultrasound. In the substudy, biopsies were taken from the right flank at baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment.Eight patients –six women and two men (one included in the substudy)– with a mean age of 44 years (SD 9.17) and aBMI of 26.88 (SD 2.38) participated. Ultrasound results showed a mean decrease of 15.34% (SD 13.32) in the abdomenarea and of 11.03% (SD 25.21) and 4.57% (SD 25.68) in the right and left flanks, respectively. Adipose tissue samplestaken from the treated area showed no inflammation or necrosis.

🔖

Cite This Article

URDİALES, C. F., RUİZ, L. C., SORİA, J. M. M., GONGALEZ, M. V., Viera-MARMOL, G. (2022). Assessing the Efficacy of Cryoadipolysis with the Cooltech® System: Case Study. Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 126–133. https://ajindex.com/articles/508697

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Alizadeh Z, Halabchi F, Mazaheri R, Abolhasani M, Tabesh M. Review of the mechanisms and effects of noninvasive body contouring devices on cellulite and subcutaneous fat. Vol. 14, International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism. Kowsar Medical Institute; 2016. p. e36727
  2. Meyer PF, Silva RMV da, Oliveira G, Tavares MA da S, Medeiros ML, Andrada CP, et al. Effects of Cryolipolysis on Abdominal Adiposity. Case Rep Dermatol Med 2016;2016:1–7
  3. Mulholland RS, Paul MD, Chalfoun C. Noninvasive Body Con- EJMI 133 touring with Radiofrequency, Ultrasound, Cryolipolysis, and Low-Level Laser Therapy. Vol. 38, Clinics in Plastic Surgery. 2011. p. 503–20
  4. Klein KB, Zelickson B, Riopelle JG, Okamoto E, Bachelor EP, Harry RS, et al. Non-invasive cryolipolysis for subcutaneous fat reduction does not affect serum lipid levels or liver function tests. Lasers Surg Med 2009;41:785–90
  5. Zelickson B, Egbert BM, Preciado J, Allison J, Springer K, Rhoades RW, et al. Cryolipolysis for noninvasive fat cell destruction: Initial results from a pig model. Dermatologic Surg 2009;35:1462–70
  6. Ingargiola MJ, Motakef S, Chung MT, Vasconez HC, Sasaki GH. Cryolipolysis for Fat Reduction and Body Contouring: Safety and Efficacy of Current Treatment Paradigms. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015;135:1581–90
  7. Mulholland R, Stephen, Paul MD, Chalfoun C. Noninvasive Body Contouring with Radiofrequency, Ultrasound, Cryolipolysis, and Low-Level Laser Therapy. Clin Plast Surg 2011;38:503–20
  8. Viera-Mármol G, García P, Villena J. Validation of Cooling and Freezing Dynamics of Cooltech® Using an Experimentally Adjusted Physical Model. SAS J Med 2017
  9. Sánchez Jaime JA. Device for Protecting Skin and Tissues for Aesthetic Cold Treatments [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2018 Aug 21]. Available from: https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/ detail.jsf?docId=WO2018060533&recNum=291&office=&queryString=%28ANA%3AES%29&prevFilter=&sortOption=公 布日降序&maxRec=34343 10. Boey GE, Wasilenchuk JL. Enhanced clinical outcome with manual massage following cryolipolysis treatment: A 4-month study of safety and efficacy. Lasers Surg Med 2014;46:20–6
  10. Nelson AA, Wasserman D, Avram MM. Cryolipolysis for Reduction of Excess Adipose Tissue. Semin Cutan Med Surg 2009;28:244–9
  11. Wells JCK. Sexual dimorphism of body composition. Vol. 21, Best Practice and Research: Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2007. p. 415–30
  12. Karastergiou K, Smith SR, Greenberg AS, Fried SK. Sex differences in human adipose tissues