Journals / Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation / 2020 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

Which Preoperative Inflammation Markers are More Valuable Prognostic Markers in Renal Cell Cancer Patients who Have Undergone Nephrectomy?

Pages
209–216
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overallsurvival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were plotted using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using thelog-rank test.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This retrospective study evaluated the prognostic significance of inflammation markers (IMs) in patientswith renal cell cancer (RCC) who had undergone nephrectomy.Methods: A total of 118 patients—39 (33.1%) were female, and 79 (66.9%) were male—were included in the study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Cox regression analysis was performed for univariate and multivariate analyses, and hazard ratios (HRs)with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to quantify the indices for estimating survival.Results: An optimal CAR cut-off value of 8 was defined according to the ROC analysis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overallsurvival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were plotted using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using thelog-rank test.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: This retrospective study evaluated the prognostic significance of inflammation markers (IMs) in patientswith renal cell cancer (RCC) who had undergone nephrectomy.Methods: A total of 118 patients—39 (33.1%) were female, and 79 (66.9%) were male—were included in the study. Allmedical records were reviewed retrospectively. The cut-off values for the IMs (c-reactive protein (CRP), CRP/albuminratio (CAR), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic immune-inflammatory index(neutrophils × platelets)/lymphocytes) (SIII)) were defined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Overallsurvival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were plotted using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using thelog-rank test. Cox regression analysis was performed for univariate and multivariate analyses, and hazard ratios (HRs)with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to quantify the indices for estimating survival.Results: An optimal CAR cut-off value of 8 was defined according to the ROC analysis. The area under the curve for CAR(0.755) for OS and DFS was greater than that for CRP, NLR, PLR, and SIII. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that CAR isan independent prognostic factor for OS (p

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİR, T., BEŞİROĞLU, M. (2022). Which Preoperative Inflammation Markers are More Valuable Prognostic Markers in Renal Cell Cancer Patients who Have Undergone Nephrectomy?. Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 209–216. https://ajindex.com/articles/508679

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Znaor A, Lortet-Tieulent J, Laversanne M, et al. International variations and trends in renal cell carcinoma incidence and mortality. Eur Urol 2015
  2. [CrossRef ] 2. Ferlay J, Steliarova-Foucher E, Lortet-Tieulent J, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012. Eur J Cancer 2013
  3. [CrossRef ] 3. Sung Han Kim, Boram Park, Eu Chang Hwang, et al. Retrospective Multicenter Long-Term Follow-up Analysis of Prognostic Risk Factors for Recurrence-Free, Metastasis-Free, Cancer- Specific, and Overall Survival After Curative Nephrectomy in Non-metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Front Oncol 2019
  4. McMillan DC. Systemic inflammation, nutritional status, and survival in patients with cancer. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2009
  5. 223–6. [CrossRef ] 5. Fukuda H, Takagi T, Kondo T, Shimizu S, Tanabe K. Predictive value of inflammation-based prognostic scores in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with cytoreductive nephrectomy. Oncotarget 2018
  6. 14296–305. [CrossRef ] 6. Yu X, Wen Y, Lin Y et al. The value of preoperative Glasgow Prognostic Score and the C-reactive protein to albumin ratio as prognostic factors for long-term survival in pathological T1N0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Cancer 2018
  7. 807–15. [CrossRef ] 7. Kinoshita A, Onoda H, Imai N et al. The C-reactive protein/ albumin ratio, a novel inflammation-based prognostic score, predicts outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2015
  8. 803–10. [CrossRef ] 8. Ishizuka M, Nagata H, Takagi K et al. Clinical significance of the C-reactive protein to albumin ratio for survival after surgery for colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2016
  9. 900–7. [CrossRef ] 9. Wei XL, Wang FH, Zhang DS et al. A novel inflammation-based prognostic score in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: the C-reactive protein/albumin ratio. BMC Cancer 2015
  10. Chen Z, Shao Y, Fan M et al. Prognostic significance of preoperative C-reactive protein: albumin ratio in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2015
  11. 14893– 900. 11. Haruki K, Shiba H, Shirai Y et al. The C-reactive protein to albumin ratio predicts long-term outcomes in patients with pancreatic cancer after pancreatic resection. World J Surg 2016
  12. 2254–60. [CrossRef ] 12. Liu X, Sun X, Liu J, et al. Preoperative C-reactive protein/albumin ratio predicts prognosis of patients after curative resection for gastric cancer. Transl Oncol 2