SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation / 2020 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 4

Evaluation of Anxiety and Depression Status of Patients Before Non-Invasive Radiology

Ozgur MADEN
Ozlem TURKOĞLU
Pages
513–519
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The groupscompared to each other statistically.Results: The depression levels of the cases before the procedure were compared and the individuals who underwent CTprocedure had the highest mean followed by MRI and USG, the lowest mean was observed in individual who underwentRG procedure, respectively (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The aim of the study was to investigate the distribution of anxiety and depression caused by non-invasiveradiological methods in patients applying to the polyclinic.In patients who applied to radiology clinics for non-invasive procedures (roentgenogram, ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging a risk and incidence of anxiety and depression have not been well documented To determine the distribution of anxiety and depression caused by non-invasive radiological methods.Methods: Three hundred three patients who applied to our Radiology Clinic enrolled in the study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:After informing the cases about the study and obtaining their consent,they were asked to answer Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory (STAI-1), Spielberger Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-2)and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) forms to determine the anxiety and depression levels of the cases.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The groupscompared to each other statistically.Results: The depression levels of the cases before the procedure were compared and the individuals who underwent CTprocedure had the highest mean followed by MRI and USG, the lowest mean was observed in individual who underwentRG procedure, respectively (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the study was to investigate the distribution of anxiety and depression caused by non-invasiveradiological methods in patients applying to the polyclinic.In patients who applied to radiology clinics for non-invasive procedures (roentgenogram, ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging a risk and incidence of anxiety and depression have not been well documented To determine the distribution of anxiety and depression caused by non-invasive radiological methods.Methods: Three hundred three patients who applied to our Radiology Clinic enrolled in the study. Patient group whomight have radiogram, ultrasonography, computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging examinations due toany health condition were included in the study. After informing the cases about the study and obtaining their consent,they were asked to answer Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory (STAI-1), Spielberger Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-2)and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) forms to determine the anxiety and depression levels of the cases. The groupscompared to each other statistically.Results: The depression levels of the cases before the procedure were compared and the individuals who underwent CTprocedure had the highest mean followed by MRI and USG, the lowest mean was observed in individual who underwentRG procedure, respectively (p

🔖

Cite This Article

MADEN, O., TURKOĞLU, O. (2022). Evaluation of Anxiety and Depression Status of Patients Before Non-Invasive Radiology. Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 4, 513–519. https://ajindex.com/articles/508661

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Dantendorfer K, Wimberger D, Katschnig H, Imhoff H. Claustrophobia in MRI scanners. Lancet 1991;338:761−2
  2. Kilborn LC, Labbé EE. Magnetic resonance imaging scanning procedures: development of phobic response during scan and at one-month follow-up. J Behav Med 1990;13:391−401
  3. Friday PJ, Kubal WS. Magnetic resonance imaging: improved patient tolerance utilizing medical hypnosis. Am J Clin Hypn 1990;33:80−4
  4. Antwi WK, Kyei KA, Gawugah JN, Opoku SY, Ogbuokiri EI. Anxiety Level Among Patients Undergoing Ultrasound Examination in Ghana. International Journal of Medical Imaging 2015;3:6−10
  5. Heyer CM, Thüring J, Lemburg SP, Kreddig N, Hasenbring M, Dohna M, et al. Anxiety of patients undergoing CT imaging-an underestimated problem? Acad Radiol 2015;22:105−12
  6. BECK AT, WARD CH, MENDELSON M, MOCK J, ERBAUGH J. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1961;4:561−71
  7. Tegin B. Cognitive Disorders in Depression: According to Beck Model. [Article in Turkish]. PhD Thesis. Ankara: Psychology Department of Hacettepe University; 1980
  8. Hisli N. Reliability and validity of Beck depression Inventory in University students. [Article in Turkish]. Psikoloji Dergisi 1989;7:3−13
  9. Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene RE. Manual for the StateTrait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1970
  10. Öner N, Le Comte A. Handbook of State and Trait Anxiety Inventory. [Article in Turkish]. Istanbul: Bogazici University Press; 1983
  11. Hong JY, Han K, Jung JH, Kim JS. Association of Exposure to Diagnostic Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation With Risk of Cancer Among Youths in South Korea. JAMA Netw Open 2019;2:e1910584
  12. Kavaliers M, Ossenkopp KP. Magnetic field inhibition of morphine-induced analgesia and behavioral activity in mice: evidence for involvement of calcium ions. Brain Res 1986;379:30−8
  13. Hensley ML, Robson ME, Kauff ND, Korytowsky B, Castiel M, Ostroff J, et al. Pre- and postmenopausal high-risk women undergoing screening for ovarian cancer: anxiety, risk perceptions, and quality of life. Gynecol Oncol 2003;89:440−6
  14. Hafslund B, Espehaug B, Nortvedt MW. Health-related quality of life, anxiety and depression related to mammography screening in Norway. J Clin Nurs 2012;21:3223−34
  15. Bölükbaş N, Erbil N, Kahraman AN. Determination of the anxiety level of women who present for mammography. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2010;11:495−8
  16. Felley C, Perneger TV, Goulet I, Rouillard C, Azar-Pey N, Dorta G, et al. Combin