Journals / Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation / 2020 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

Characteristics of Presentation and Metabolic Risk Factors in Relation to Extent of Involvement in Infants with Nephrolithiasis

Pages
78–85
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Data on age at diagnosis, gender, family history of nephrolithiasis,parental consanguinity, symptoms on admission, urinary abnormalities, surgery, size of renal calculi, and metabolicrisk factors (hypercalciuria, hyperuricosuria, hyperoxaluria, hypocitraturia, cystinuria, hypercalcemia) were recorded foreach patient and compared with the number of kidneys affected (bilateral vs. unilateral), the number of kidney stones(multiple vs. single), and the kidney stone size (microlithiasis vs. larger stones).Results: Overall, 58.6% of the infants were girls.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: To evaluate the characteristics of presentation and metabolic risk factors in relation to the extent of involvement in infants with nephrolithiasis.Methods: A total of 111 infants (age range 0.3–11.8 months, 58.6% were girls) diagnosed with nephrolithiasis in the firstyear of life were included in this retrospective study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data on age at diagnosis, gender, family history of nephrolithiasis,parental consanguinity, symptoms on admission, urinary abnormalities, surgery, size of renal calculi, and metabolicrisk factors (hypercalciuria, hyperuricosuria, hyperoxaluria, hypocitraturia, cystinuria, hypercalcemia) were recorded foreach patient and compared with the number of kidneys affected (bilateral vs. unilateral), the number of kidney stones(multiple vs. single), and the kidney stone size (microlithiasis vs. larger stones).Results: Overall, 58.6% of the infants were girls.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Our findings emphasize the association of identifiablemetabolic abnormalities with the extent of nephrolithiasis and a higher likelihood of bilateral kidney involvement, multiple kidney stones, and larger kidney stones in cases of hypercalciuria, hyperuricosuria, and hyperoxaluria, respectively.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the characteristics of presentation and metabolic risk factors in relation to the extent of involvement in infants with nephrolithiasis.Methods: A total of 111 infants (age range 0.3–11.8 months, 58.6% were girls) diagnosed with nephrolithiasis in the firstyear of life were included in this retrospective study. Data on age at diagnosis, gender, family history of nephrolithiasis,parental consanguinity, symptoms on admission, urinary abnormalities, surgery, size of renal calculi, and metabolicrisk factors (hypercalciuria, hyperuricosuria, hyperoxaluria, hypocitraturia, cystinuria, hypercalcemia) were recorded foreach patient and compared with the number of kidneys affected (bilateral vs. unilateral), the number of kidney stones(multiple vs. single), and the kidney stone size (microlithiasis vs. larger stones).Results: Overall, 58.6% of the infants were girls. Irritability was the most common symptom on admission (34.2%).Microlithiasis (62.2%), bilateral kidney involvement (61.3%), multiple kidney stones (73.9%), and metabolic risk factors (45.0%, hypercalciuria in 31.5%) were commonly noted. Bilateral nephrolithiasis was associated with significantlyhigher rates of hypercalciuria than unilateral nephrolithiasis (39.7% vs. 18.6%, respectively; p=0.022). The presence ofmultiple kidney stones was associated with a significantly higher rate of hyperuricosuria than the presence of a singlekidney stone (20.7% vs. 0.0%, respectively; p=0.006). Larger kidney stone size was associated with a significantly higherrate of hyperoxaluria than microlithiasis (100.0% vs. 0.0%; respectively; p=0.002).Conclusion: In conclusion, our findings revealed the association of nephrolithiasis in the first year of life with identifiable metabolic abnormalities in a considerable portion of patients. Our findings emphasize the association of identifiablemetabolic abnormalities with the extent of nephrolithiasis and a higher likelihood of bilateral kidney involvement, multiple kidney stones, and larger kidney stones in cases of hypercalciuria, hyperuricosuria, and hyperoxaluria, respectively.

🔖

Cite This Article

YİLMAZ, K., DORTERLER, M. E. (2022). Characteristics of Presentation and Metabolic Risk Factors in Relation to Extent of Involvement in Infants with Nephrolithiasis. Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 78–85. https://ajindex.com/articles/508648

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Sas DJ. An update on the changing epidemiology and metabolic risk factors in pediatric kidney stone disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2011;6:2062–8
  2. Sas DJ, Becton LJ, Tutman J, Lindsay LA, Wahlquist AH. Clinical, demographic, and laboratory characteristics of children with nephrolithiasis. Urolithiasis 2015;44:241–6
  3. Lopez M, Hoppe B. History, epidemiology and regional diversities of urolithiasis. Pediatr Nephrol 2010;49–59
  4. Dwyer ME, Krambeck AE, Bergstralh EJ, Milliner DS, Lieske JC, Rule AD. Temporal trends in incidence of kidney stones among children: a 25-year population based study. J Urol 2012;188:247–52
  5. Issler N, Dufek S, Kleta R, Bockenhauer D, Smeulders N, Van't Hoff W. Epidemiology of paediatric renal stone disease: a 22-year single centre experience in the UK. BMC Nephrol 2017;18:136
  6. Mousavi Jazayeri SMH, Mamaghani ME, Pourmoghaddam A, Emam SJ. Microlithiasis and Nephrolithiasis among infants: Is it a new phenomenon? Pak J Med Sci 2011;27:153–6
  7. Guven AG, Koyun M, Baysal YE, Akman S, Alimoglu E, Akbas H, et al. Urolithiasis in the first year of life. Pediatr Nephrol 2010;25:129–34
  8. Edvardsson V, Elidottir H, Indridason OS, Palsson R. High incidence of kidney stones in Icelandic children. Pediatr Nephrol 2005;20:940–4
  9. Sarkissian A, Babloyan A, Arikyants N, Hesse A, Blau N, Leumann E (2001) Pediatric urolithiasis in Armenia: a study of 198 patients observed from 1991 to 1999. Pediatr Nephrol 16:728–732
  10. Dickson N, Kara, T, Tuohy P. Rapid national survey of renal stones in New Zealand infants. J Paediatr Child Health 2009;45:633–5
  11. Remzi D. Urolithiasis in infancy. Urology 1980;15:248–50 12. Hernandez JD, Ellison JS, Lendvay TS. Current Trends, Evaluation, and Management of Pediatric Nephrolithiasis. JAMA Pediatr 2015;169:964–70
  12. Routh JC, Graham DA, Nelson CP: Epidemiological trends in pediatric urolithiasis at United States freestanding pediatric hospitals. J Urol 2010;184:1100–4
  13. Alon US, Zimmerman H, Alon M. Evaluation and treatment of pediatric idiopathic urolithiasis-revisited. Pediatr Nephrol 2004;19:516–520
  14. Polito C, La Manna A, Cioce F, Villani J, Nappi B, Di Toro R. Clinical presentation and natural course of idiopathic hypercalciuria in children. Pediatr Nephrol 2000;15:211–4
  15. Andrioli V, Highmore K, Leonard MP, Guerra LA, Tang K, Vethamuthu J, Meyers V, Sullivan KJ, Keays MA. Infant nephrolithiasis and nephrocalcinosis: Natural history and predictors of surgical intervention. J Pedia