Journals / Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation / 2020 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

Predictive Value of Left Ventricular Diastolic Parameters on Type and Severity of Acute Coronary Syndrome

Pages
66–72
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The most likely reason forthis is the inadequate number of patients in some groups.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: Coronary artery disease is the most common cardiovascular disease and is associated with high rates ofmortality and morbidity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In our study, we aimed to evaluate the predictive value of left ventricular diastolicparameters on type and severity of acute coronary syndromes.Methods: The study was prospectively performed by including 60 patients, who applied to our hospital with complaints of chest pain. 12 –lead ECG was performed for all patients.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The most likely reason forthis is the inadequate number of patients in some groups.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: Coronary artery disease is the most common cardiovascular disease and is associated with high rates ofmortality and morbidity. The first impaired echocardiographic parameter in acute ischemia is diastolic function andsystolic dysfunction occurs later. In our study, we aimed to evaluate the predictive value of left ventricular diastolicparameters on type and severity of acute coronary syndromes.Methods: The study was prospectively performed by including 60 patients, who applied to our hospital with complaints of chest pain. 12 –lead ECG was performed for all patients. In order to make diastolic function staging, echocardiography was performed by a cardiologist. After receiving a diagnosis, patients were assessed with statistical analysesregarding their echocardiographic results.Results: According to echocardiography results of patients included in the study, normal function was observed in 25patients; impaired relaxation in 21; pseudonormal pattern in 7 and restrictive pattern in 7. According to the diagnosisof the patients, 26 patients were diagnosed with nonspecific chest pain. 27 patients were diagnosed as having NSTEMIand 7 patients were diagnosed as having STEMI. There was no correlation between the echocardiographic results of ourpatients and the diagnoses they have been received.Conclusion: Although diastolic parameters have many uses to evaluate diagnosis, prognosis and mortality of acutecoronary syndromes, there was no significant difference between the groups in our study. The most likely reason forthis is the inadequate number of patients in some groups.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİREL, M. E., KAMA, N. A., TEKTEN, B. O., CELİK, K., COLAK, T. (2022). Predictive Value of Left Ventricular Diastolic Parameters on Type and Severity of Acute Coronary Syndrome. Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 66–72. https://ajindex.com/articles/508642

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Scarborough P, Wickramasinghe K, Bhatnagar P, Rayner M. Trends in coronary heart disease, 1961-2011. British Heart Foundation, London. 2011
  2. ESC KILAVUZLARI. Israrcı ST-segment yükselmesi belirtileri göstermeyen hastalarda Akut Koroner Sendromların (AKS) tedavi kılavuzları. 2011
  3. Onat A, Karabulut A, Esen AM, Uyarel H, Özhan H, Albayrak S. Analysis of all-cause mortality and coronary events in the Turkish Adult Risk Factor Survey 2005. Türk Kardiyol Dern Ars 2006;34:149–53
  4. Killip T, Kimball JT. Treatment of myocardial infarction in a coronary care unit: a two year experience with 250 patients. The American journal of cardiology 1967;20:457–64
  5. Green GB. Hill PM. Approach To Chest Pain And Possible Myocardial Ischemia. Tintinalli J Emergency Medicine A Comprehensive Study Guide Fifth edit McGraw-Hill pub New York. 1999
  6. Sonmez Demiryoğuran N, Topaçoğlu H, Karcıoğlu Ö. Nonspesifik Göğüs Ağrılı Hastalarda Anksiyete Bozukluğu. 2005
  7. Van de Werf F, Ardissino D, Betriu A, Cokkinos DV, Falk E, Fox KA, et al. Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. European heart journal 2003;24:28–66
  8. Eriksson S, Wittfooth S, Pettersson K. Present and future biochemical markers for detection of acute coronary syndrome. Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences 2006;43:427–95
  9. Lev EI, Battler A, Behar S, Porter A, Haim M, Boyko V, et al. Frequency, characteristics, and outcome of patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndromes with undetermined electrocardiographic patterns. The American journal of cardiology 2003;91:224–7
  10. Antman E, Bassand J-P, Klein W, Ohman M, Sendon JLL, Rydén L, et al. Myocardial infarction redefined–a consensus document of the Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction: the Joint European Society of Cardiology/ American College of Cardiology Committee. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:959–69
  11. Takasaki K, Otsuji Y, Yoshifuku S, Kuwahara E, Yuasa T, El Rahim AERA, et al. Noninvasive estimation of impaired hemodynamics for patients with acute myocardial infarction by Tei index. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 2004;17:615–21
  12. Møller JE, Søndergaard E, Poulsen SH, Appleton CP, Egstrup K. Serial Doppler echocardiographic assessment of left and right ventricular performance after a first myocardial infarction. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 2001;14:2