Journals / Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation / 2020 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3

Clinical Significance of ERCC2, XPC, ERCC5 and XRCC3 Gene Polymorphisms in Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma

Pages
332–340
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Due to DNA repair gene polymorphisms, there are differences in the repair capacity between several cancer types.The aim of this study is to evaluate the association between some of the DNA repair gene polymorphisms and clinicaloutcome in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL).Methods: The association between clinical factors including stage at diagnosis, extra-nodal involvement, tumor burden, bone marrow involvement, relapse status, disease-free/overall survival times and DNA repair gene polymorphismsincluding ERCC2 (Lys751Gln), XPC (Gln939Lys), ERCC5 (Asp1104His) and XRCC3 (Thr241Met) in 58 patients with DLBCL.T-Shift Real-Time PCR was used to detect these mutations.Results: The median survival times were 60 months and 109 months in patients with CC genotype and CA/AA genotype of XPC gene polymorphism, respectively (p=0.017).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: DNA repair genes protects the genome from DNA damage both of endogenous and exogenous stress factors.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Due to DNA repair gene polymorphisms, there are differences in the repair capacity between several cancer types.The aim of this study is to evaluate the association between some of the DNA repair gene polymorphisms and clinicaloutcome in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL).Methods: The association between clinical factors including stage at diagnosis, extra-nodal involvement, tumor burden, bone marrow involvement, relapse status, disease-free/overall survival times and DNA repair gene polymorphismsincluding ERCC2 (Lys751Gln), XPC (Gln939Lys), ERCC5 (Asp1104His) and XRCC3 (Thr241Met) in 58 patients with DLBCL.T-Shift Real-Time PCR was used to detect these mutations.Results: The median survival times were 60 months and 109 months in patients with CC genotype and CA/AA genotype of XPC gene polymorphism, respectively (p=0.017).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However this study involves relatively low number of cases and these polymorphisms must be studied in larger studies toconfirm our results.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: DNA repair genes protects the genome from DNA damage both of endogenous and exogenous stress factors. Due to DNA repair gene polymorphisms, there are differences in the repair capacity between several cancer types.The aim of this study is to evaluate the association between some of the DNA repair gene polymorphisms and clinicaloutcome in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL).Methods: The association between clinical factors including stage at diagnosis, extra-nodal involvement, tumor burden, bone marrow involvement, relapse status, disease-free/overall survival times and DNA repair gene polymorphismsincluding ERCC2 (Lys751Gln), XPC (Gln939Lys), ERCC5 (Asp1104His) and XRCC3 (Thr241Met) in 58 patients with DLBCL.T-Shift Real-Time PCR was used to detect these mutations.Results: The median survival times were 60 months and 109 months in patients with CC genotype and CA/AA genotype of XPC gene polymorphism, respectively (p=0.017). More interestingly, median survival times were 9 months and109 months in patients with CC (XPC)/CC (XRCC3) and CA/AA (XPC)/CT/TT (XRCC3) for both XPC and XRCC3 genepolymorphisms, respectively (p=0.004). Six of 18 patients with CC genotype for XPC (Gln939Lys) had bone marrowinvolvement while only one of 40 patients with CA and AA genotype of XPC (Gln939Lys) gene polymorphism hadbone marrow involvement at diagnosis. Statistical analysis failed to show significant relationship between other genepolymorphisms and survival times. Cox Regression analysis standardized by age, stage and bone marrow involvementshowed that IPI, XPC and XRCC3 gene polymorphisms were independent factors for OS.Conclusion: XPC and XRCC3 gene polymorphisms may be important for clinical presentation and OS in DLBCL. However this study involves relatively low number of cases and these polymorphisms must be studied in larger studies toconfirm our results.

🔖

Cite This Article

PAYDAS, S., BAHCECİ, A., ERGİN, M., ŞEYDAOĞLU, G., UÇAR, G. (2022). Clinical Significance of ERCC2, XPC, ERCC5 and XRCC3 Gene Polymorphisms in Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma. Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3, 332–340. https://ajindex.com/articles/508631

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Risch NJ. Searching for genetic determinants in the new millennium. Nature 2000;405:847–56
  2. Carlson CS, Eberle MA, Rieder MJ, Smith JD, Kruglyak L, Nickerson DA. Additional SNPs and linkage-disequilibrium analyses are necessary for whole-genome association studies in humans. Nature genetics 2003;33:518–21
  3. Hu JJ, Mohrenweiser HW, Bell DA, Leadon SA, Miller MS. Symposium overview: genetic polymorphisms in DNA repair and cancer risk. Toxicology and applied pharmacology. 2002;185:64–73
  4. Peltomaki P. DNA mismatch repair and cancer. Mutation research 2001;488:77–85
  5. Friedberg EC. DNA damage and repair. Nature 2003; 421:436– 40
  6. Hoeijmakers JH. Genome maintenance mechanisms for preventing cancer. Nature 2001;411:366–74
  7. Finkel T, Holbrook NJ. Oxidants, oxidative stress and the biology of ageing. Nature 2000;408:239–47
  8. Testoni M, Zucca E, Young KH, Bertoni F. Genetic lesions in diffuse large B-cell lymphomas. Annals of oncology: official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology / ESMO. 2015
  9. Papaefthymiou MA, Giaginis CT, Theocharis SE. DNA repair alterations in common pediatric malignancies. Medical science monitor: international medical journal of experimental and clinical research 2008;14:RA8–15
  10. Krajinovic M, Labuda D, Mathonnet G, et al. Polymorphisms in genes encoding drugs and xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes, DNA repair enzymes, and response to treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Clinical cancer research: an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 2002;8:802–10
  11. Goode EL, Ulrich CM, Potter JD. Polymorphisms in DNA repair genes and associations with cancer risk. Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention: a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology 2002;11:1513–30
  12. De Ruyck K, Szaumkessel M, De Rudder I, et al. Polymorphisms in base-excision repair and nucleotide-excision repair genes in relation to lung cancer risk. Mutation research 2007;631:101–10
  13. Shen M, Purdue MP, Kricker A, et al. Polymorphisms in DNA repair genes and risk of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in New South Wales, Australia. Haematologica 2007;92:1180–5
  14. Joseph T, Kusumakumary P, Chacko P, Abraham A, Pillai MR. DNA repair gene XRCC1 polymorphisms in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer letters 2005;217:17–24
  15. Pakakasama S, Sirirat T, Kanchanachumpol S, et al. Genetic polymorphisms and haplotypes of DNA r