SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation / 2021 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

Retrospective Evaluation of Patients with Upper ExtremityPeripheral Nerve Block

Seray TÜRKMEN
Mehmet MUTLU
Pages
184–188
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: In conclusion, our study seems to indicate possible prevention of complications with US-guided proce dure with no substantial contribution to the success rate of the BP block.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: In this study, we aimed to examine the effect of US-guided periferic nerve stimulator (PNS) versus PNSalone during establishing ISBPB and ABPB on sensory block initiation (SNI), motor block initiation (MBI), total motorblock (TMB), and postoperative analgesia (PoAn) durations and related complications.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Records of adult patients with ASA I-II patients who underwent upper extremity surgery under ISPBP (n=40)or ABPB (n=60) with PNS alone or ISBPB (n=40) or ABPB (n=60) with US-guided PNS between January 2016 and January2018 were collected.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: In conclusion, our study seems to indicate possible prevention of complications with US-guided proce dure with no substantial contribution to the success rate of the BP block.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: In this study, we aimed to examine the effect of US-guided periferic nerve stimulator (PNS) versus PNSalone during establishing ISBPB and ABPB on sensory block initiation (SNI), motor block initiation (MBI), total motorblock (TMB), and postoperative analgesia (PoAn) durations and related complications. Methods: Records of adult patients with ASA I-II patients who underwent upper extremity surgery under ISPBP (n=40)or ABPB (n=60) with PNS alone or ISBPB (n=40) or ABPB (n=60) with US-guided PNS between January 2016 and January2018 were collected. Results: Our study showed significantly shorter duration of SBI, MBI, TMB, and PoAn in patients who underwent ISBPBthrough PNS alone compared to that in those who underwent the procedure under US guidance. However, a studyinvestigating benefits of US reported duration of block initiation shorter than that in those receiving PNS alone. Conclusion: In conclusion, our study seems to indicate possible prevention of complications with US-guided proce dure with no substantial contribution to the success rate of the BP block.

🔖

Cite This Article

TÜRKMEN, S., MUTLU, M. (2022). Retrospective Evaluation of Patients with Upper ExtremityPeripheral Nerve Block. Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 184–188. https://ajindex.com/articles/508574

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Auyong DB, Yuan SC, Choi DS, Pahang JA, Slee AE, Hanson NA. A double-blind randomized comparison of continuous interscalene, supraclavicular, and suprascapular blocks for total shoulder arthroplasty. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2017;42:302–9
  2. Hussain N, Goldar G, Ragina N, Banfield L, Laffey JG, Abdallah FW. Suprascapular and interscalene nerve block for shoulder surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesthesiology 2017;127:998–1013
  3. Cho S, Kim YJ, Baik HJ, Kim JH, Woo JH. Comparison of ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block techniques: perineural injection versus single or double perivascular infiltration. Yonsei Med J 2015;56:838–44
  4. Czuczman M, Shanthanna H, Alolabi B, Moisiuk P, O'Hare T, Khan M, et al. Randomized control trial of ultrasound-guided erector spinae block versus shoulder periarticular anesthetic infiltration for pain control after arthroscopic shoulder surgery: Study protocol clinical trial (SPIRIT compliant). Medicine (Baltimore) 2020;99:e19721
  5. Barrington MJ, Gledhill SR, Kluger R, Clarke AL, Wong DM, Davidson H, et al. A randomized controlled trial of ultrasound versus nerve stimulator guidance for axillary brachial plexus block. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2016;41:671–7
  6. Bao X, Huang J, Feng H, Qian Y, Wang Y, Zhang Q, et al. Effect of local anesthetic volume (20 mL vs 30 mL ropivacaine) on electromyography of the diaphragm and pulmonary function after ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block: a randomized controlled trial. Regional anesthesia and pain medicine 2019;44:69–75
  7. Takeda A, Ferraro LH, Rezende AH, Sadatsune EJ, Falcão LF, Tardelli MA. Minimum effective concentration of bupivacaine for axillary brachial plexus block guided by ultrasound. Braz J Anesthesiol 2015;65:163–9
  8. Gianesello L, Magherini M, Pavoni V, Horton A, Nella A, Campolo MC. The influence of interscalene block technique on adverse hemodynamic events. J Anesth 2014;28:407–12
  9. Avellanet M, Sala-Blanch X, Rodrigo L, Gonzalez-Viejo MA. Permanent upper trunk plexopathy after interscalene brachial plexus block. J Clin Monit Comput 2016;30:51–4
  10. Maalouf DB, Dorman SM, Sebeo J, Goytizolo EA, Gordon MA, Yadeau JT, et al. Prospective, randomized double-blind study: does decreasing interscalene nerve block volume for surgical anesthesia in ambulatory shoulder surgery offer sameday patient recovery advantages? Reg Anesth Pain Med 2016;41:438–44
  11. Gurger M, Ozer AB. A comparison of continuous interscalene block vers