Journals / Eurasian Journal of Family Medicine / 2019 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4

Knowledge, Attitude and Behavior Levels of University Students About Hepatitis A, Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C

Pages
137–148
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The mosteffective way to protect against these diseases is to increase the knowledge and awareness levels of the societyand prevent the transmission of these diseases.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study is to reveal the knowledge, attitude and behaviors of the university studentsabout Hepatitis A, Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C.Methods: This study was done among 1048 students from different faculties of five different universitiesin Ankara, was carried out between October 2012 and July 2013.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Knowledge level ofparticipants was scored from 1 to 5 out of 100 according to the answers given about Hepatitis A, B and C.Results: When the average points of knowledge about hepatitis A, B and C is considered, it is seen thatthe knowledge points of males according to females and the knowledge points of the students who study inmedical faculties according to the other faculties are higher.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The mosteffective way to protect against these diseases is to increase the knowledge and awareness levels of the societyand prevent the transmission of these diseases.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study is to reveal the knowledge, attitude and behaviors of the university studentsabout Hepatitis A, Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C.Methods: This study was done among 1048 students from different faculties of five different universitiesin Ankara, was carried out between October 2012 and July 2013. A questionnaire was prepared by the authorsby rewieving the literature and the participants were asked to fill this questionnaire. Knowledge level ofparticipants was scored from 1 to 5 out of 100 according to the answers given about Hepatitis A, B and C.Results: When the average points of knowledge about hepatitis A, B and C is considered, it is seen thatthe knowledge points of males according to females and the knowledge points of the students who study inmedical faculties according to the other faculties are higher. Participants were found to have a risky attitudewith respect to the spread of Hepatitis A, B and C infections. While males had more risky behaviors, it wasseen that there was no significant difference between the students of medical faculties according to otherfaculties.Conclusion: Despite advances in technology and health, Hepatitis A, B and C infections continue to bean important public health problem today. This study showed that even university students, whose educationand intellectual levels are considered to be high according to society, have low level of knowledge about viralhepatitis and exhibit risky attitudes and behaviors, necessity of individual and social education. The mosteffective way to protect against these diseases is to increase the knowledge and awareness levels of the societyand prevent the transmission of these diseases.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYPAK, C., GÖRPELİOĞLU, S., DİCLE, M. (2022). Knowledge, Attitude and Behavior Levels of University Students About Hepatitis A, Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C. Eurasian Journal of Family Medicine, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4, 137–148. https://ajindex.com/articles/508355

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Curry MP, Chopra S. Acute viral hepatitis. In: Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R (Eds.). Principles and practice of infectious diseases. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone, 2005:1426-40
  2. Bell BP, Anderson DA, Feınstone SM. Hepatitis A virüs. In: Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R (Eds.). Principles and practice of infectious diseases. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone, 2005:2162-84
  3. Özdemir D, Kurt H. Hepatit B virusu enfeksiyonlarının epidemiyolojisi. In: Tabak F, Balık İ, Tekeli E (Eds.). Viral hepatit 2007. Ankara: Viral Hepatitle Savaşım Derneği, 2007:108-17
  4. Akkız H. HCV enfeksiyonu: epidemiyoloji ve korunma. In: Kılıçturgay K, Badur S (Eds.). Viral hepatit 2003. Ankara: Viral Hepatitle Savaşım Derneği, 2003:199- 216
  5. Mohd Hanafiah K, Groeger J, Flaxman AD, Wiersma ST. Global epidemiology of hepatitis C virus infection: new estimates of age-spesific antibody to HCV seroprevalence. Hepatology 2013;57(4):1333-42
  6. Dökmetaş İ. HAV enfeksiyonunun epidemiyolojisi ve patogenezi. In: Tabak F, Balık İ, Tekeli E (Eds.). Viral hepatit 2007. Ankara: Viral Hepatitle Savaşım Derneği, 2007:5260
  7. EMI [Internet]. Appendix 21 Hepatitis B virus: epidemiology and transmission risks [cited 2018 Nov 10]. Available from: https://www.hpsc.ie/az/ EMIToolkit/appendices/app 21.pdf 8. Nausheen N, Muhammad Rasul J, Amjad A, Muhammad A, Muhammad I, Mohammad N, et al. Prevalence of hepatitis C virus genotypes and potential transmission risks in Malakand Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Virol J 2017;14(1):160-8
  8. Salgado M, Suarez E, Ortiz A, Adrovet S, Marrero E, Melendez M, et al. Knowledge of viral hepatitis among Puerto Rican adults: implications for prevention. J Community Health 2011;36(4):565-73
  9. Angelillo IF, Viggiani NM, Rizzo L, Bianco A. Food handlers and foodborne diseases: knowledge, atitudes and reported behavior in Italy. J Food Prot 2000;63(3):381-5
  10. Angelillo IF, Foresta MR, Scozzafava C, Pavia M. Consumers and foodborne diseases: knowledge, attitudes and reported behavior in one region of Italy. Int J Food Microbiol 2001;64(1-2):161- 6
  11. Mohammad D, Mohammad A, Bahar H, Maral H. Knowledge and awareness regarding viral hepatitis among paramedical and humanities students. J Biostat Epidemiol 2017;3(2):60-4
  12. Yamazhan T, Durusoy R, Tasbakan MI, Tokem Y, Pullukcu H, Sipahi OR, et al. Nursing students' immunisation status and knowledge about viral hepatitis in Turkey: a multicentre cross-sectional study. Int Nurs Rev 2011;58(2):181- 5. 14