Journals / Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine / 2016 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2

Mechanical Chest Compression Devices: Historical Evolution, Classification and Current Practices, A Short Review

Pages
94–104
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The purpose of this manuscript was to draw attention to developments in this medical area and to examine studies on the effectiveness of these devices.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The standard treatment of cardiac arrest is cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), performed with effective manual chest compressions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Although current CPR was developed 50 years ago, cardiac arrest still has a high mortality rate and manual chest compressions have some potential limitations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The purpose of this manuscript was to draw attention to developments in this medical area and to examine studies on the effectiveness of these devices.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The standard treatment of cardiac arrest is cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), performed with effective manual chest compressions. Although current CPR was developed 50 years ago, cardiac arrest still has a high mortality rate and manual chest compressions have some potential limitations. Because of these limitations, mechanical chest compression devices were developed to improve the efficiency of CPR. This CPR technology includes devices such as the mechanical piston load-distributing band, active compression-decompression CPR, simultaneous sterno-thoracic CPR, impedance threshold valve, phased thoracic-abdominal active compression-decompression CPR and active compression-decompression CPR with enhanced external counterpulsation, and the impedance threshold valve. The purpose of this manuscript was to draw attention to developments in this medical area and to examine studies on the effectiveness of these devices.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYGÜN, M., GENÇ, A., EREN, N. B., KARADAĞLI, F., YAMAN, H. E. (2022). Mechanical Chest Compression Devices: Historical Evolution, Classification and Current Practices, A Short Review. Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2, 94–104. https://ajindex.com/articles/508152

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Travers AH, Rea TD, Bobrow BJ, Edelson DP, Berg RA, Sayre MR, et al. 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care: Part 4: CPR Overview. Circulation 2010
  2. [CrossRef] 2. Cooper JA, Cooper JD, Cooper JM. Contemporary reviews in cardiovascular medicine: cardiopulmonary resuscitation
  3. history, current practice, and future direction. Circulation 2006
  4. [CrossRef] 3. Sasson C, Rogers MA, Dahl J, Kellermann AL. Predictors of survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2010
  5. [CrossRef] 4. Kozacı N, Ay MO, İçme F, Aktürk A, Satar S. Are we successful in cardiopulmonary resuscitation? Cukurova Med J 2013
  6. Kleinman ME, Brennan EE, Goldberger ZD, Swor RA, Terry M, Bobrow BJ, et al. 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care: Part 5: Adult Basic Life Support and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality. Circulation 2015
  7. [CrossRef] 6. Cave DM, Gazmuri RJ, Otto CW, Nadkarni VM, Cheng A, Brooks SC, et al. 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care: Part 7: CPR Techniques and Devices. Circulation 2010
  8. [CrossRef] 7. Berg RA, Hemphill R, Abella BS, Aufderheide DC, Hazinski MF, Lerner B, et al. Part 5: adult basic life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2010
  9. 122(18 Suppl 3): S685-705. [CrossRef] 8. Nolan JP, Soar J, Zideman DA, Biarent D, Bossaert LL, Deakin C, et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2010 Section 1. Executive summary. Resuscitation 2010
  10. [CrossRef] 9. Rubertsson S, Karlsten R. Increased cortical cerebral blood flow with LUCAS
  11. a new device for mechanical chest compressions compared to standard external compressions during experimental cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation 2005
  12. [CrossRef] 10. Keseg DP. The Merits of Mechanical CPR: Do mechanical de vices improve compression consistency and resuscitation outcomes. JEMS 2012
  13. Zhang Y, Wu X, Yuan H, Xu L, Karemaker J. Computer models in bedside physiology. Chapter 2: Optimal cardiopulmonary resuscitation as identified by computer modeling. 2013: 12-32. Downloaded from UvA-DARE. Available at ht