Journals / Journal of education and research in nursing (Online) / 2022 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2

Procedural Factors Affecting Nurses’ Workload and Laboratory Efficiency in the Interventional Cardiology

Pages
208–219
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In order to improve the efficiency and productivity of these units, it is recommended to consider “fluoroscopy times and nurse workloads in different procedures,” “distribution of procedures during the day,” and “the room turnover times.”

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: Interventional cardiology nursing is a highly specialized nursing specialty in which knowledge and skills from various nursing disciplines such as cardiovascular, intensive care, and operating room nursing are combined.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The data were collected between May 1 and 30, 2019, in cardiac catheterization laboratory with single operating room.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In order to improve the efficiency and productivity of these units, it is recommended to consider “fluoroscopy times and nurse workloads in different procedures,” “distribution of procedures during the day,” and “the room turnover times.”
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background: Interventional cardiology nursing is a highly specialized nursing specialty in which knowledge and skills from various nursing disciplines such as cardiovascular, intensive care, and operating room nursing are combined. The study was conducted to analyze the procedural factors affecting the workload of interventional cardiology nurses and to determine incompatibilities between supply and requirements in terms of manpower planning and laboratory efficiency. Methods: The study was designed as prospective, observational, and descriptive. The data were collected between May 1 and 30, 2019, in cardiac catheterization laboratory with single operating room. Regarding 4 different interventional procedures, records have been kept about “clinical data for procedures, perioperative nurse functions and workload” and the relationship between those data has been analyzed. Results: In the study, a total of 39 procedures were observed. Mean fluoroscopy times, total nurse workloads, and room turnover times were, respectively, 7.1 ± 2.8, 34.7 ± 9.5, and 9.1 ± 2.7 minutes in coronary angiography, 34.4 ± 23.17, 91.2 ± 51.9, and 15.6 ± 6.6 in percutaneous coronary intervention, 61.9 ± 22.6, 124.6 ± 28.7, and 22.0 ± 3.7 in permanent pacemaker implantation, and 111.6 ± 26.2, 187.3 ± 45.8, and 41.3 ± 20.1 in peripheral vascular interventions. About 41.02% of the procedures took place between 10 am and 1 pm, when there were 3 nurses in the unit. Between 1 pm and 3 pm and between 3 pm and 5 pm when the number of nurses in the unit was 4, the percentage of procedures that took place was 20.5% and 17.9%, respectively. In the peripheral vascular interventions, postoperative nursing workload was found to be higher (P < .001). Conclusion: Workload of interventional cardiology nurses are higher than total operation and fluoroscopy times. The operating room turnover time shortens if the number of circulating nurses involved in procedures increases. In order to improve the efficiency and productivity of these units, it is recommended to consider “fluoroscopy times and nurse workloads in different procedures,” “distribution of procedures during the day,” and “the room turnover times.”

🔖

Cite This Article

KAÇAR, Ö., AYGÜN, M. (2022). Procedural Factors Affecting Nurses’ Workload and Laboratory Efficiency in the Interventional Cardiology. Journal of education and research in nursing (Online), Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2, 208–219. https://ajindex.com/articles/562512

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Faxon DP, Williams DO. Interventional cardiology current status and future directions in coronary disease and valvular heart disease. Circulation. 2016
  2. 133(25):2697-2711. [CrossRef] 2. Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2018
  3. [CrossRef] 3. Bashore MT, Balter S, Barac A, et al. American College of Cardiology Foundation/ Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions expert consensus document on Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory standards update. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012
  4. 59(23):2222- 2305. [CrossRef] 4. Intersocietal Accreditation Commission (IAC) Standards and Guidelines for Cardiovascular Catheterization Accreditation 2018. Available at: https://ww w.int ersoc ietal.org/ cath/ stand ards/ IACCa rdiov ascul arCat heter izati onSta ndard s2018.pdf. 5. Naidu SS, Aronow HD, Box LC, et al. SCAI expert consensus statement: 2016 Best practices in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: (Endorsed by the cardiological society of India, and sociedad latino americana de cardiologia ıntervencionista
  5. affirmation of value by the Canadian association of ınterventional cardiology–association Canadienne de cardiologie d’intervention). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016
  6. 88(3):407-423. [CrossRef] 6. White K, Macfarlane H, Hoffmann B, et al. Consensus statement of standards for ınterventional cardiovascular nursing practice. Heart Lung Cırc. 2018
  7. 27(5):535-551. [CrossRef] 7. Hinterbuchner L, Coelho S, Esteves R, et al. A cardiac catheterisation laboratory core curriculum for the continuing professional development of nurses and allied health professions: developed by the education working group of the nurses and allied professions committee for the European association of percutaneous cardiovascular interventions (EAPCI) 2016. EuroIntervention. 2017
  8. 12(16):2028-2030. [CrossRef] 8. World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki: ethic al principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013
  9. 310(20):2191-2194. [CrossRef] 9. Masoudi F, Ponirakis A, Lemos J, et al. Trends in U.S. cardiovascular care: 2016 report from 4. ACC National cardiovascular data registries. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017
  10. 69(11):1428-1450. [CrossRef] 10. Lavi S, Jolly SS, Bainbridge D, Farah Manji VR, Ronit L. Sedation, analgesia, and anaesthesia variability in laboratory-based cardiac procedures: an international survey. Can J Cardiol. 2014