Journals / Eurasian Journal of Educational Research / 2005 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 20

The Effect of Using Grading Scale and Answer Key to Grader's Reliability

Yazılı Yoklamaların Puanlamasında Puanlama Cetveli ve Yanıt Anahtarı Kullanımının (Aynı) Puanlayıcı Güvenirliğine Etkisi

Pages
166–177
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion (a) out of the comparison of the grades of essay type examinations given by the same teacher using and/or without using the grading scale and response key and (b) out of the comparison of the grades of essay type given by the same teacher at different times using and/or without using grading scale and response key, it was found out that there were significant differences between the average of grading and there was a negative effect of the time passed between the grades on the consistence.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this research the effect of grading scale and answer key in the grading of essay type examinations and the time between grading and the effect of grading done by the same teachers to the reliability were examined.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this research the effect of grading scale and answer key in the grading of essay type examinations and the time between grading and the effect of grading done by the same teachers to the reliability were examined.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion (a) out of the comparison of the grades of essay type examinations given by the same teacher using and/or without using the grading scale and response key and (b) out of the comparison of the grades of essay type given by the same teacher at different times using and/or without using grading scale and response key, it was found out that there were significant differences between the average of grading and there was a negative effect of the time passed between the grades on the consistence.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this research the effect of grading scale and answer key in the grading of essay type examinations and the time between grading and the effect of grading done by the same teachers to the reliability were examined. In conclusion (a) out of the comparison of the grades of essay type examinations given by the same teacher using and/or without using the grading scale and response key and (b) out of the comparison of the grades of essay type given by the same teacher at different times using and/or without using grading scale and response key, it was found out that there were significant differences between the average of grading and there was a negative effect of the time passed between the grades on the consistence.

Özet

Bu araştırmada, yazılı yoklama sınavlarının puanlanmasında puanlama cetveli ve yanıt anahtarı kullanımının ve puanlamalar arasında geçen zamanın, aynı ve farklı öğretmenler tarafından yapılan puanlamaların güvenirliğine etkisi incelenmiştir. Sonuç olarak; (a) aynı öğretmenin puanlama cetveli ve yanıt anahtarı kullanarak ve kullanmadan verdiği yazılı yoklama puanlarının karşılaştırılması sonucunda ve (b) aynı öğretmenin farklı zamanlarda, puanlama cetveli ve yanıt anahtarı kullanarak ve kullanmadan verdiği yazılı yoklama puanlarının karşılaştırılması sonucunda puanların ortalamaları arasında anlamlı bir fark olduğu ve puanlamalar arasında geçen zamanın bu tutarlılığı bozmada etkili bir rol oynadığı tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAN, A. (2022). The Effect of Using Grading Scale and Answer Key to Grader's Reliability. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 20, 166–177. https://ajindex.com/articles/507876

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Gronlund, N.E. (1982). Constructing Achievement Tests. Englewood Cliffs, N. Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc. Karasar, N. (1994).
  2. Bilimsel Araştırma Teknikleri, Ankara: 3A Araştırma Eğitim Danışmanlık Ltd. Karmel, L. J. (1970). Measurement and Education in The Schools, Toronto: The Mc Millan Company. Linquist, E.F. (1951).
  3. Educational Measurement, Washington D.C.: American Council on Education. Marshall, J.C. and Hales L.W. (1971).
  4. Classroom Test Construction, California: Addison. Wessley Publishing Company. Marshall, J.C. and Hales L.W. (1972).
  5. Essential of Testing, Massachusets, California: Addison WessleyPublishing Company. Micheels W.J.and Karnes M.R (1950).
  6. Measuring Educational Achievement, London: Mc Graw-Hill Book Company. Micheels W.J.and Karnes M.R (1968). Eğitimde Başarının Ölçülmesi, (Çev. İbrahim Yurt), Ankara:
  7. Ajans Türk Matbaası. Muluk, Z. (1973). Deney Düzenlemede İstatistiksel Yöntemler, Ankara:
  8. Akademi Matbaası. Turgut, F. (1997). Eğitimde Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Metotları, Ankara:
  9. Yargıcı Matbaası. Wood, D. A. (1961). Test Construction Development and Interpretation of Achievement Tests, Ohio: Charles E. Merril Books Inc.