Journals / Eurasian Journal of Educational Research / 2012 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 48

Validation of a chinese version of metacognitive awareness of reading strategies inventory

Pages
117–134
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Test-retest reliability was also high (r= .91, p< .01).Conclusions and Recommendations: The results from the study help to conclude that the translated and adapted instrument MARSl-CN reflects good reliability and validity, and that it can be used in research on students' metacognitive awareness of reading strategies in Chinese middle schools.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Problem Statement: Students' metacognition can play a critical role in their reading learning, and their metacognitive awareness of reading strategies has attracted the interest of both educational researchers and teachers.
📊
Key Findings & Data:An instrument is needed to assess students' metacognitive awareness of reading strategies in the Chinese context.Purpose of Study: The aim of the present research is to validate the Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies Inventory in the Chinese educational context (MARSl-CN).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Test-retest reliability was also high (r= .91, p< .01).Conclusions and Recommendations: The results from the study help to conclude that the translated and adapted instrument MARSl-CN reflects good reliability and validity, and that it can be used in research on students' metacognitive awareness of reading strategies in Chinese middle schools.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Problem Statement: Students' metacognition can play a critical role in their reading learning, and their metacognitive awareness of reading strategies has attracted the interest of both educational researchers and teachers. However, there is not an existing questionnaire for the research of students' metacognition on reading in China. An instrument is needed to assess students' metacognitive awareness of reading strategies in the Chinese context.Purpose of Study: The aim of the present research is to validate the Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies Inventory in the Chinese educational context (MARSl-CN). This inventory can be used by Chinese teachers to improve their students' reading skills.Methods: The present research was comprised of two pilot studies and one main study. In the first pilot study, a translated version of the original questionnaire was administered to a sample of 216 students in six different middle schools, and then in the second pilot study, a revised version of the initial translation was tried out on 494 students. Finally, in the mam study, the revised MARSI-CN was tested with 2119 students. In the second pilot study phase, exploratory factor analysis was applied, and in the main study, confirmatory factor analysis was carried out.Findings and Results: A three-factor structure of the MARSl-CN resulted from the exploratory factor analysis on the second pilot study data. The consecutive confirmatory factor analysis - building on data from the main study - confirmed the three-factor structure and reflected good fit indices $x{2}$df =1.613, RMSEA= .035, TLI= .959, GFI= .960, CFI= .966). Internal consistency in the questionnaire, as measured with Cronbach's Alpha, was .863. Test-retest reliability was also high (r= .91, p< .01).Conclusions and Recommendations: The results from the study help to conclude that the translated and adapted instrument MARSl-CN reflects good reliability and validity, and that it can be used in research on students' metacognitive awareness of reading strategies in Chinese middle schools.

🔖

Cite This Article

WU, L., VALCKE, M., KEER, H. V. (2022). Validation of a chinese version of metacognitive awareness of reading strategies inventory. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 48, 117–134. https://ajindex.com/articles/507432

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Ay, S. (2009). Academic reading strategies and metacognitive awareness of university students. In S. Ay, O. Aydin, I. Ergene, S. Gökmen, S. lssever, & D. Pecenek (Eds.), Essays on Turkish linguistics: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Turkish Linguistics, August 6-8, 2008 (pp. 441-450).
  2. Wiesbaden, Germanny: Harrassowitz Verlag. Baker, L., & Carter, B. L. (2008). Metacognitive processes and reading comprehension. In S. E. Israel & G. G. Duffy (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp. 373 - 388). Oxford, UK: Routledge. Baydik, B. (2011). Okuma güçlüğü olan öğrencilerin üstbilişsel okuma stratejilerini ktıllanimi ve öğretmenlerinin okuduğunu anlama öğretim uygulamalarinin incelenmesi [Examining the use of metacognitive reading strategies of students with reading difficulties and their teachers' reading comprehension practices]. Eğitim ve Bilim [Education and Science], 36, 301-319.
  3. Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25, 3186-3191.
  4. Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65-116).
  5. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Chen, H.-C. (1996). Chinese reading and comprehension: A cognitive psychology perspective. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The handbook of Chinese psychology (pp. 43-62).
  6. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  7. Chen, H.-C., & Tzeng, O. (1992). Language processing in Chinese. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: North Holland, V. Chen, X. (2011). Qiantan yuwen yuedu jiaoxue [On the teaching of reading of Chinese]. Xiandai Yuwen: Jiaoxue Yanjiu Ban [Modern Chinese: Teaching and Research], (3), 44. Cross, D. R., & Paris, S. G. (1988). Developmental and instructional analyses of children's metacognition and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80,131-142.
  8. Efklides, A. & Misailidi, P. (2010). Introduction: The present and the future in metacognition. In A. Efklides & P. Misailidi (Eds.), Trends and prospects in metacognition research (pp. 1-18).
  9. New York, NY: Springer. Efklides, A. (2009). The role of metacognitive experiences in the learning process. Psicothema, 21,76-82.
  10. Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231-236).
  11. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Flavell, J. H. (1979). M