Journals / Eurasian Journal of Educational Research / 2020 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 89

Relationship of Servant Leadership and Organizational Citizenship Behavior with Mediation of Psychological Empowerment

Pages
241–264
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

For data analysis the Pearsoncorrelation coefficient and structural equationmodeling were used.Findings: The amount of correlation coefficient of servant leadership with psychologicalempowerment (r=0.616, p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: The purpose was to investigate therelationship between servant leadership andteachers' organizational citizenship behavior withmediating role of psychological empowerment.Research Methods: This study was an applied andcorrelation research method based on structuralequation modeling. 281 teachers of Zahedan citywere studied by stratified random sampling method.To collect information, three questionnaires wereused: servant leadership (Gholipur et al., 2009),organizational citizenship behavior (Podsakoff &MacKenzie, 1990) and psychological empowerment(Spreitzer, 1995).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Purpose: The purpose was to investigate therelationship between servant leadership andteachers' organizational citizenship behavior withmediating role of psychological empowerment.Research Methods: This study was an applied andcorrelation research method based on structuralequation modeling. 281 teachers of Zahedan citywere studied by stratified random sampling method.To collect information, three questionnaires wereused: servant leadership (Gholipur et al., 2009),organizational citizenship behavior (Podsakoff &MacKenzie, 1990) and psychological empowerment(Spreitzer, 1995).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:For data analysis the Pearsoncorrelation coefficient and structural equationmodeling were used.Findings: The amount of correlation coefficient of servant leadership with psychologicalempowerment (r=0.616, p
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose was to investigate therelationship between servant leadership andteachers' organizational citizenship behavior withmediating role of psychological empowerment.Research Methods: This study was an applied andcorrelation research method based on structuralequation modeling. 281 teachers of Zahedan citywere studied by stratified random sampling method.To collect information, three questionnaires wereused: servant leadership (Gholipur et al., 2009),organizational citizenship behavior (Podsakoff &MacKenzie, 1990) and psychological empowerment(Spreitzer, 1995). For data analysis the Pearsoncorrelation coefficient and structural equationmodeling were used.Findings: The amount of correlation coefficient of servant leadership with psychologicalempowerment (r=0.616, p

🔖

Cite This Article

GHALAVI, Z., NASTIEZAIE, N. (2022). Relationship of Servant Leadership and Organizational Citizenship Behavior with Mediation of Psychological Empowerment. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 89, 241–264. https://ajindex.com/articles/507102

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Adebayo, D. O. (2005). Ethical attitudes and prosocial behaviour in the Nigeria police: Moderator effects of perceived organizational support and public recognition. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 28(4), 684–705.
  2. Aghajani, H., Samadi Miarkolaei, H., & Samadi Miarkolaei, H. (2013). Organizational Citizenship Behavior’s Relationship and Staffs’ psychological Empowerment. Journal of public administration, 5(2), 1–18.
  3. Baharlou, M., Beshlideh, K., Hashemi Sheykhshabani, S. Y., & Naami, A. (2014). Investigation Relationship between Leader – Member Exchange and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Mediating Role of Psychological Empowerment and Organizational Commitment. Organizational Culture Management, 12(1), 1–19.
  4. Baijuka, E. R. (2008). [Leader Member Exchange, Organizational Justice, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior. A Case of Ministry of Public Service and Two International NGOs in Uganda]. A Doctoral Dissertation, Makerere University. Bambale, A. J. (2014). Relationship between servant leadership and organizational citizenship behaviors: review of literature and future research directions. Journal of Marketing and Management, 5(1), 1–16.
  5. Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 248–287.
  6. Barari, R., & Jamshidi, L. (2015). The role of mediators of self–efficacy of teachers in the relationship between emotional intelligence and job burnout Primary Teachers. Quarterly Scientific Research New Approach in Educational Management, 6(4), 177–200.
  7. Bennet, J. L. (2001). Trainers as leaders of learning. Training and development journal, 55(3), 40–62.
  8. Bogler, R., & Somech, A. (2004). Influence of teacher empowerment on teachers’ organizational commitment, professional commitment and organizational citizenship behavior in schools. Teaching and teacher education, 20(3), 277–289.
  9. Bowen, D. E., & Lawler, E. F. (1992). The empowerment of service workers: What, why, how, and when. Sloan Management Review, 33(3), 31–39.
  10. Brewer, C. (2010). Servant leadership: A review of literature. Online Journal of Workforce Education and Development, 4(2), 1–8.
  11. Buchen, I. H. (1998). Servant leadership: A model for future faculty and future institutions. The Journal of Leadership Studies, 5(1), 125–134.
  12. Castro, C. B., Armario, E. M., & Ruiz, D. M. (2004). The influence of employee organizational citizenship behavior on customer loyalt. International Journal Of Ser