Journals / Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics / 2021 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

Learner autonomy among students of French as a foreign language in a tertiary context

Pages
85–108
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The implications of the study were provided in light of the findings.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Learner autonomy has attracted numerous researchers in language teaching for the last four decades.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aims to investigate learner autonomy in learning French at a university in Turkey by exploring students’ perceptions relevant to learner autonomy (i.e., responsibilities, abilities, and metacognitive strategies), motivation, and autonomous language learning activities.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The implications of the study were provided in light of the findings.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:French as a foreign language · learner autonomy · the L2 Motivational Self System

Abstract

Learner autonomy has attracted numerous researchers in language teaching for the last four decades. However, there exists still a need to investigate to what extent learners of foreign languages, in particular languages other than English, are autonomous. This study aims to investigate learner autonomy in learning French at a university in Turkey by exploring students’ perceptions relevant to learner autonomy (i.e., responsibilities, abilities, and metacognitive strategies), motivation, and autonomous language learning activities. The study adopted a mixed-methods approach and the data were collected through a questionnaire (N = 57) and learning diaries (n = 14). The results revealed that the students seemed to hold teachers more responsible than themselves for learning French and in general they reported a moderate level of decision-making abilities and use of metacognitive strategies. Moreover, a considerable number of the students slightly motivated or did not feel motivated. The qualitative data on motivation analyzed based on the L2 Motivational Self System showed that the participants’ ideal L2 selves were shaped by professional aspirations and/or integrative motives. However, most of them appeared to have difficulties in maintaining their motivation and only a few students seemed to have intrinsic motivation. Furthermore, the majority of the students engaged in limited autonomous language learning activities. Thus, most of the students did not appear to be autonomous learners in learning French. The implications of the study were provided in light of the findings.

🔖

Cite This Article

Gürses, M. Ö. (2022). Learner autonomy among students of French as a foreign language in a tertiary context. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 85–108. https://ajindex.com/articles/506974

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Bekleyen, N., & Selimoğlu, F. (2016). Learner behaviors and perceptions of autonomous language learning. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 20(3). Retrieved from http://www.tesl-ej.org
  2. Bektaş-Çetinkaya, Y., & Oruç, N. (2010). Turkish students’ motivation to learn English at public and private universities. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 4662– 4666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.746
  3. Benson, P. (2011). What’s new in autonomy? The Language Teacher, 35(4), 15–18. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/204a/789abcd87c64f03ba72251ed89de4b116342.pdf
  4. Benson, P. (2013). Teaching and researching: Autonomy in language learning (2nd ed.). Abingdon, United Kingdom: Routledge. Benson, P. (2016). Language learner autonomy: Exploring teachers’ perspectives on theory and practice. In R. Barnard & J. Li (Eds.), Language learner autonomy: Teachers’ beliefs and practices in Asian contexts (pp. xxxiii–xliii). Phnom Penh, Cambodia: IDP Education Ltd. Bhattacharya, A., & Chauhan, K. (2010). Augmenting learner autonomy through blogging. ELT Journal, 64(4), 376–384. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccq002
  5. Borg, S., & Al-Busaidi, S. (2012). Learner autonomy: English language teachers’ beliefs and practices (ELT Research Paper 12–07).
  6. London, United Kingdom: British Council. Retrieved from https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/sites/teacheng/files/b459%20ELTRP%20Report%20Busaidi_final.pdf
  7. Breeze, R. (2002). Attitudes towards learner autonomy among Spanish university students. Atlantis, 24(2), 23–36. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org
  8. Busse, V. (2017). Plurilingualism in Europe: Exploring attitudes toward English and other European languages among adolescents in Bulgaria, Germany, the Netherlands, and Spain. The Modern Language Journal, 101(3), 566–582. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12415
  9. Chan, V., Spratt, M., & Humphreys, G. (2002). Autonomous language learning: Hong Kong tertiary students' attitudes and behaviours. Evaluation & Research in Education, 16(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500790208667003
  10. Cotterall, S. (1995). Readiness for autonomy: Investigating learner beliefs. System, 23(2), 195–205.
  11. Cotterall, S. (1999). Key variables in language learning: what do learners believe about them? System, 27(4), 493–513.
  12. Council of Europe. (2005). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: learning, teaching, assessment. Paris, France: Les Editions Didier. Daflizar, D. (2017). Readiness for learner autonomy: An investigation