SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 12

The Impact of Current Status Expression in Revealing Willingness (Trade Dealings as a Case Study)

İbrahim ALBAKKAR
Nader A.M.FALYOUNA
Pages
9–50
Publication Date
2022-10-13
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

To the end, the article focuses on the impact of the Current Statues in Trade Dealings.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The willingness of the two contractors is something intangible, an external visage should be expressed to give the agreement its lawful force.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Vocalization is considered the main arbiter, as it is a clear means of communication.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:To the end, the article focuses on the impact of the Current Statues in Trade Dealings.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The willingness of the two contractors is something intangible, an external visage should be expressed to give the agreement its lawful force. Vocalization is considered the main arbiter, as it is a clear means of communication. However, this did not hinder humans from utilizing other means, excluding vocal expression, due to the need or offered choice at the moment of contraction. Hence, the indicators of expressing will are diversified and abundant. One of these means is the Current Status. The main purpose of this research is to deal with this indicator. It starts by defining what is willingness, the means of expressing it and how the Current Status is related to these indicators. The article then will deal with the differences between the direct expressiveness and the expressiveness of the Current Status. The article explains the proof upon which scholars gave importance to Current Status. To the end, the article focuses on the impact of the Current Statues in Trade Dealings.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALBAKKAR, İ., A.M.FALYOUNA, N. (2022). The Impact of Current Status Expression in Revealing Willingness (Trade Dealings as a Case Study). Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 12, 9–50. https://ajindex.com/articles/505758

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Afifi, Sadik Ahmed. Nazariyyetü'l-Hak. Markez Ed-Dirasetû'l-Kanuniyye: Mısır, 2016. Bâbertî, Ekmelüddîn Muhammed b. Muhammed (v. 786). el-İnâye Şerhu’l-Hidâye, Beyrut: Dâru’l-Fikr, ts. Bornu, Muhammed Sidki. el-Veciz fi İzah Kavâidi'l-Fikhiyye. Beyrut: Müessestu'rRisâle, 2003. Buhâri, Alâüddîn Abdülazîz b. Ahmed, (v. 730). Keşfü’l-Esrâr ʻan Usûli Fahri’l-İslâm el-Bezdevî. Beyrut: Dâru'l-Kitabu'l-Arabi, ts. Buhûtî, Mansûr b. Yunus el-Hanbelî (v. 1051). Keşşâfü’l-Kınâʽ an Metni’l-İknâʽ. Beyrut: Dâru Kutubu’l-İlmiyye, ts. Buhûtî, Mansûr b. Yunus el-Hanbelî (v. 1051). Şerhu Müntehe'l-İrâdât. Beyrut: Dâr Âlemu'l-Kutub, 1993. Cessâs, Ebu Bekr Ahmed b. Ali Er-Razi (v. 370). Şerhu Muhtasari't-Tahavi. Beyrut: Dâru'l-Beşâiri'l-İslâmiyye, 2010.
  2. Cevdet Paşa, Ahmed (v. 1312). Mecelle-i Ahkâm-ı Adliyye. Karatşi: Ticaret Kütüb, ts. Desûkî, Muhammed b. Ahmed b. Arafe (v. 1230). Hâşiyetü’d-Desûkî ala’ş-Şerhi’lKebîr. Beyrut: Dâru’l-Fikr, ts. Ebû Bekir İbnü’l-Arabî, Muhammed ibn abdullah (v. 543). Ahkâmü'l-Kur'ân. Thk. Muhammed Atta. Beyrut: Dâru'l-Kutubu'l-İlmiyye, 3. Baskı, 2003.
  3. Elbessam, Abdullah b. Abdurrahman. Tavzihü'l-Ahkâm Min Bulugu'l-Maram: Mekke: Mektebetu'l- Esedi, 5. Baskı, 2003. Ezherî, Ahmed b. Ğânim el-Mâlikî (v. 1126).el-Fevâkihü’d-Devânî ala Risâleti İbn Ebî Zeyd el-Kayravânî. Beyrut: Dâru’l-Fikr, 1995. Feyûmî, Ahmed b. Muhammed b. Ali. el-Misbâhu'l-Munîr. Thk. Abdulazîm eşŞennâvî. Kahire: Dâru'l- Me'arif, 2. Baskı, ts. Gazâlî, Muhammed b. Muhammed. el-Vasit Fi'l Mezheb. Thk. Ahmed İbrahim ve Muhammed Tamir. Kahire: Dârus-Selam, 1979. Hattâb, Muhammed b. Muhammed (v. 954). Mevâhibü'l-Celîl li-Şerhi Muhtasarı Halîl. Beyrut: Dâru’l-Fikr, 3. Baskı, 1992.
  4. Haydar Efendi, Ali. Dürerü’l-Hükkâm Şerhu Mecelleti’l-Ahkâm. Beyrut: Dâru'l-Cîl, 1991. İbn Âbidin, Muhammed Amin b. Ömer (v. 1252). Radd al-Muhtār ala ad-Durr alMukhtâr. Beyrut: Dâru'l-Fikir, 2. Baskı, 1992. İbn Cinnî, Usmân (v. 392). el-Hasâis. Thk. Muhammed Ali en-Neccâr. Beyrut: Âlemu'l-Kutub, 4. Baskı, ts. İbn Kudâme el-Makdisi, Abdullah B. Ahmed(v. 620). el-Muğnî. Kahire: Mektebetü’l-Kahire, 1968. İbn Mâze, Burhânüddîn Mahmud b. Ahmed el-Hanefî (v. 616).el-Muhîtu’l-Burhânî fi’l-Fıkhi’n-Nuʽmânî. Thk. Abdulkerim Sâmi el-Cündî. Beyrut: Dâru Kutubu’l-İlmiyye, 2004.
  5. İbn Nüceym, Zeynüddin b. İbrahim (v. 970). el-Bahru’r-Râik Şerhu Kenzi’d-Dekâik. Beyrut: İslami Kitap Evi, 2. Baskı, ts. İbn Nüceym, Zeynüddin b. İbrahim (v. 970). el- Eşbâh ve'n-nezâir. Beyrut: Dâru kutubu'l-İlmiyye, 1999.
  6. İbn Receb, Zeynüddîn Ab