Journals / Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

Protean and boundaryless career attitudes of employees: a study in service sector

İşgörenlerin çok yönlü ve sınırsız karyer tutumları: Hizmet sektöründe bir araştırma

Pages
173–196
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

After the analyses; while the attitudes of self- directed dimension of protean career differ in terms of number of children, occupation and income, those of values-driven dimension differ in terms of occupation, income and status Moreover, while the attitudes of psychological mobility dimension of boundaryless career differ in terms of sector, those of physical mobility dimension differ in terms of age and occupation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The study is carried out to identify protean and boundaryless career attitudes of employees and determine whether the attitudes differ in terms of employees features.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Questionnaire technique is used in the study and 308 applicable questionnaire forms are gath- ered.In order to determine whether the attitudes of protean and boundaryless career differ in terms of employees features, one-way Anova and independent-samples t-test are used.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:After the analyses; while the attitudes of self- directed dimension of protean career differ in terms of number of children, occupation and income, those of values-driven dimension differ in terms of occupation, income and status Moreover, while the attitudes of psychological mobility dimension of boundaryless career differ in terms of sector, those of physical mobility dimension differ in terms of age and occupation.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The study is carried out to identify protean and boundaryless career attitudes of employees and determine whether the attitudes differ in terms of employees features. The universe consists of the employees in four service sectors (tourism, finance, education and health) in Nevsehir. Questionnaire technique is used in the study and 308 applicable questionnaire forms are gath- ered.In order to determine whether the attitudes of protean and boundaryless career differ in terms of employees features, one-way Anova and independent-samples t-test are used. After the analyses; while the attitudes of self- directed dimension of protean career differ in terms of number of children, occupation and income, those of values-driven dimension differ in terms of occupation, income and status Moreover, while the attitudes of psychological mobility dimension of boundaryless career differ in terms of sector, those of physical mobility dimension differ in terms of age and occupation.

Özet

Bu çalışma, işgörenlerin çok yönlü ve sınırsız kariyer tutumlarını tespit etme ve bu tutumların işgörenlerin özelliklerine göre farklılık gösterip göstermediğini belirleme amacını taşımaktadır. Araştırmanın evrenini Nevşehir ili merkezindeki dört hizmet sektöründe (turizm, finans, eğitim, sağlık) çalışanlar oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmada veriler anket tekniği ile toplanmış ve araştırma sonunda 308 adet kullanılabilir anket elde edilmiştir. Çok yönlü ve sınırsız kariyer boyutlarının, işgörenlerin özellikleri itibariyle farklılık göste rip göstermediğini tespit etmek amacıyla tek yönlü Anova ve bağımsız t-testi uygulanmıştır. Araştırma sonunda, çok yönlü kariyerin kendi kendini yönetme boyutuna ilişkin tutumların, işgörenlerin çocuk sayısı, meslek ve gelir açısından; değerlerine göre hareket etme boyutuna ilişkin tutumların ise meslek, gelir ve işletmedeki konumu açısından farklılık gösterdiği ortaya çıkmıştır. Sınırsız kariyerin psikolojik hareketlilik boyutuna ilişkin tutumlar, işgörenlerin çalıştıkları sektör açısından farklılaşırken; fiziksel hareketlilik boyutuna ilişkin tutumlar ise,yaşları ve mesleklerine göre farklılık göstermek- tedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KALE, E., ÖZER, S. (2022). Protean and boundaryless career attitudes of employees: a study in service sector. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 173–196. https://ajindex.com/articles/505633

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Arıkan, R. (1995),
  2. Araştırma Teknikleri ve Rapor Yazma, Ankara:
  3. Tutibay Yayınları.
  4. Arthur, M. (1994), “The Boundaryless Career: A New Perspective for Organizational Inquiry”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(4), 295-306.
  5. Arthur, M. B. ve D. M. Rousseau (1996), “Introducti on: The Boundaryless Career as a New Employment Principle”, Ed. M. B. Arthur ve D. M. Rousseau, The Boundaryless Career: A New Employment Principle for a New Organizational Era, New York: Oxford University, 3-20
  6. Arthur, M. B., D. T Hall ve B. C. Lawrence (1989), “Generating New Directions in Career Theory: The Case for A Transdisciplinary Approach”, Ed. M. B. Arthur, D. T. Hall ve B.C. Lawrence, The Handbook of Career Theory, New York: Cambridge University, 7-25
  7. Arthur, M. B., K. Inkson, ve J. K. Pringle (1999), The New Careers: Individual Action and Economic Change, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Baruch Y. ve E. Rosenstein (1992), “Human Resource Management in Israeli Firms:Planning and Managing Careers in High-Technology Or ganizations”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 3(3), 477-495
  8. Baruch, Y. (2006), “Career Development in Organizations and Beyond: Balancing Traditional and Contemporary Viewpoints”, Human Resource Management Review 16, 125–138 Briscoe, J. P. ve D. T. Hall (2006a), “Special Section on Boundaryless and Protean Careers: Next Steps in Conceptualizing and Measuring Boundaryless and Protean Careers”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69(1), 1–3. Briscoe, J. P. ve D. T. Hall (2006b), “The Interplay of Boundaryless and Protean Careers: Combinations and Implications”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69(1), 4–18. Briscoe, J. P. ve L. M. Finkelstein (2009), “The “New Career” and Organizational Commitment Do Boundaryless and Protean Attitudes Make a Difference?”, Career Development International,14(3), 242-260
  9. Briscoe, J. P., D. T. Hall ve R. L. F. DeMuth (2006), “Protean and Boundaryless Careers: An Empirical Exploration”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69(1), 30–47. Brislin, R.W., W. J. Lonner ve R.M. Thorndike (1973),
  10. Cross-Cultural Research Methods, New York: John Wiley &Sons Production. Buelens, M. ve H. Van den Broeck (2007), “An Analysis of Differences in Work Motivation Between Public and Private Sector Organizations”, Public Administration Review, 67(1), 65–74. Clarke, M. (2009), “Plodders, Pragmatists, Visionaries and Opportunists: Career Patterns and Employability”, Career Development International,14(1), 8-28
  11. Crant, J. M.(2000), “Pro