SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

Neo-liberal Küreselleşme Çağında Hegemonyayı Yeniden Yapılandırmak

Restructuring Hegemony' in the Age of Neo-liberal Globalization

Muhammed Kürşad ÖZEKİN
Pages
91–112
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

From this pointof view, hegemony, in its simple terms, is conceptualized as a prevailing consensus amongtransnationalizing social forces consist of classes,international institutions, globally-minded,political elites and transnational capitalist class.Briefly stated, drawing on neo-Gramscian approach and theory of global capitalism, this studyaims to provide an up-to-date and analyticallyvalid conceptualization of hegemony in the ageof neo-liberal globalization.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article aims to present a critical evaluationof the theory of hegemonic stability and worldsystem theory on an epistemological and anontological basis and provides an alternativetheoretical route by associating the process ofglobalisation with the reconstruction of hegemony in today s world.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In parallel with thisobjective, a Gramscian derived articulation ofhegemony is presented in order to analyze therole of the global configuration of capital, stateand social relations of production in the formation process of the transnational historic bloc asa new hegemonic constellation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:From this pointof view, hegemony, in its simple terms, is conceptualized as a prevailing consensus amongtransnationalizing social forces consist of classes,international institutions, globally-minded,political elites and transnational capitalist class.Briefly stated, drawing on neo-Gramscian approach and theory of global capitalism, this studyaims to provide an up-to-date and analyticallyvalid conceptualization of hegemony in the ageof neo-liberal globalization.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This article aims to present a critical evaluationof the theory of hegemonic stability and worldsystem theory on an epistemological and anontological basis and provides an alternativetheoretical route by associating the process ofglobalisation with the reconstruction of hegemony in today s world. In parallel with thisobjective, a Gramscian derived articulation ofhegemony is presented in order to analyze therole of the global configuration of capital, stateand social relations of production in the formation process of the transnational historic bloc asa new hegemonic constellation. From this pointof view, hegemony, in its simple terms, is conceptualized as a prevailing consensus amongtransnationalizing social forces consist of classes,international institutions, globally-minded,political elites and transnational capitalist class.Briefly stated, drawing on neo-Gramscian approach and theory of global capitalism, this studyaims to provide an up-to-date and analyticallyvalid conceptualization of hegemony in the ageof neo-liberal globalization.

Özet

Bu makale Hegemonik İstikrar ve Dünya Sistemikuramlarının epistemolojik ve ontolojik düzeydeeleştirel bir değerlendirmesini yapmayı ve günümüz dünyasında hegemonyanın yenideninşasını küreselleşme süreci ile ilişkilendirerekalternatif bir kuramsal rota sunmayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu hedef doğrultusunda, yeni bir hegemonik yapılanma olarak ulusötesi tarihsel bloğunoluşum sürecinde sermayenin, devletin vetoplumsal üretim ilişkilerinin küresel biçimlenişinin oynadığı rolü değerlendirebilmek amacıylahegemonya meselesinin Gramscici bir ifadelendirmesi sunulacaktır. Bu bakış açısından hareketle en basit anlamıyla hegemonya, uluslararasıkurumlar, küreselleşme yanlısı siyasal elitler veulusötesi kapitalist sınıflardan müteşekkil ulusötesileşen toplumsal güçler arasında hakim olanbir mutabakat olarak kavramsallaştırılmaktadır.Kısaca ifade etmek gerekirse bu çalışma yeniGramscici yaklaşıma ve küresel kapitalizm kuramına dayanarak neo-liberal küreselleşme çağında hegemonyanın daha güncel ve analitik olarakdaha geçerli bir yorumunu sunmayı hedeflemektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZEKİN, M. K. (2022). Neo-liberal Küreselleşme Çağında Hegemonyayı Yeniden Yapılandırmak. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 91–112. https://ajindex.com/articles/505609

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Arrighi, G.(1994),
  2. The Long Twentieth Century, London: Verso. Arrighi, G. and B. J. Silver (1999), Chaos and Governance in the Modern World System, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  3. Ashford, N.(1993), ″The Ideas of the New Right″, Ed. N. Ashford, and A. G. Jordan, Public Policy and the Impact of the New Right. London; New York: Pinter Publis- hers. Augelli, E. and C. Murphy (1988), America's Quest for Supremacy and the Third World: A Gramscian Analysis, London: Pinter Publishers.
  4. Bieler A. and A. D. Morton (2004), ″A critical Theory Route to Hegemony, World Order and Historical Change: Neo-Gramscian Perspectives in International Relati- ons″, Capital & Class, 28(1), 85-113.
  5. Blyth, M. (2002), Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century, New York: Cambridge University Press.
  6. Cox, R. W. (1981), ″Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory″, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 10 (2), 126-55.
  7. Cox, R. W. (1983), ″Gramsci, Hegemony, and International Relations: An Essay in Method ″, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 12(2),162–175. Cox, R. W. (1989), ″Production, the State and Change in World Order″, Ed. E. Czempiel and J.N. Rosenau, Global Changes and Theoretical Challenges: Approac- hes to World Politics for the 1990s, Toronto: Lexington Books. Cox, R. W. (1993), ″Production and Security″, Ed. R. W. Cox and T. J. Sinclair, Approaches to World Order, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Cox, R. W. (1997), The New Realism: Perspectives on Multilateralism and World Order, London: Palgrave Macmillan. Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). (2006), Pre- liminary Overview of the Economics of Latin America and the Caribbean, Santiago, Chile: United Nations. Friedman, M. (1962),
  9. Capitalism and Freedom, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  10. Frank, A. G. (1998), ReOrient: Global Economy in the Asian Age, Berkeley: University of California Press.
  11. Gill, S. (1990), American Hegemony and the Trilateral Commission, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  12. Gill, S. (2003), Power and Resistance in the New World Order, Basingstoke: Palg- rave Macmillan. Gill, S. and L. David (1988), The Global Political Economy: Perspectives, Problems and Policies, London: Harvester and Wheatsheaf. Gill, S. and L. David (1989), ″Global Hegemony and the Structural Power of Capi- tal″, International Studies Quarterly, 33(4), 475-99.
  13. Gilpin, R. (1981), War and Chang