SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3

Development of Cluster Theory-A Conceptual Framework

Kümelenme Teorisi: Kavramsal Bir Çerçeve

Sema YİĞİT
Pages
107–128
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The Learning Regions and RegionalInnovation Systems theories both involves othertheories and highlights innovation

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Although the industry clusters drew researchersattention af ter 1990s with Michael E.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Porter,actually it was based on much older varioustheories.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The Learning Regions and RegionalInnovation Systems theories both involves othertheories and highlights innovation
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Although the industry clusters drew researchersattention af ter 1990s with Michael E. Porter,actually it was based on much older varioustheories. The aim of this study is examiningdevelopment of cluster theory by discussing oldertheories which contribute to the current clustertheory. First developed theories like TraditionalPlace and Agglomeration and Industrial Districtmostly stressed geographic concentration whichis essential f or clustering. Then, Italian IndustryDistrict and Creative Milieu, New IndustrialSpaces, and New Economic Geography Theoriesemphasized social relationship between membersunlike their predecessors. As a result, it can besaid that cluster theory which is associated withPorter in nowadays is largely based on theprevious theories. However, it is important tonote Porter's valuable contributions to clustertheory. The Learning Regions and RegionalInnovation Systems theories both involves othertheories and highlights innovation

Özet

Kümelenme kavramı araştırmacıların ilgisini dahaçok 1990lardan itibaren Michael E. Porter ileçekmiş olsa da kavramın kökleri çok daha eskiyedayanmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı kümelenmeteorisinin bugünkü haline gelmesine katkıyaptıkları düşünülen teorileri ele alarakkümelenme teorisinin gelişimini incelemektir.Geleneksel Konum ve Yığılma Teorileri ileEndüstriyel Bölge gibi geliştirilen ilk teoriler dahaçok kümelenmenin de temeli olan coğrafikyığılmaya vurgu yapmışlardır. Sonrasında İtalyanSanayi Bölgeleri ve Yenilikçi Çevreler, Yeni SanayiOdakları ve Yeni Ekonomik Coğrafya teorileriöncekilerden farklı olarak üyeler arasındaki sosyalilişkiler üzerinde de durmuşlardır. Sonuç olarakgünümüzde Porter ile özdeşleştirilen kümelenmeteorisinin büyük oranda önceki teorileredayandığı söylenebilir. Ancak burada Porterındeğerli katkılarını göz ardı etmek imkânsızdır.Bölgesel İnovasyon Sistemleri ve ÖğrenenBölgeler teorileri ise diğerlerini kapsamaklaberaber inovasyonu öne çıkarmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

YİĞİT, S. (2022). Development of Cluster Theory-A Conceptual Framework. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3, 107–128. https://ajindex.com/articles/505605

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Amara, N., Landry, R., & Ouimet, M. (2003), “Milieux Innovateurs: Determinants and Policy Implications”, DRUID Summer Conference 2003 on Creating, Sharing and Transferring Knowledge (s. 1-33). Copenhagen: DRUID. Andersson, T., Serger, S. S., Sörvik, J., & Hansson, E. W. (2004). The Cluster Policies Whitebook.http://www.clusterplattform.at/fileadmin/user_upload/clusterbibliot hek/916_TheClusterPoliciesWhitebook.pdf, (Erişim:10.12.2012).
  2. Arıcıoğlu, E. (2011), İktisat Teorisinde Unutulmuş Bir Kavram: “Mekan”, Ekonomik Yaklaşım, 22(81):17-44.
  3. Asheim, B. T. (1995), “Industrial Districts As ‘Learning Regions’: A Condition For Prosperity”, European Planning Studies, 4(4):379-400.
  4. Asheim, B. T. (2000), Industrial Districts: The Contributions of Marshall and Beyond, G. L. Clark, M. P. Feldman, & M. S. Gertler içinde, The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography (s. 413-431). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  5. Becattini, G. (1979), Dal Settore Industriale al Distretto Industriale. Alcune considerazioni sull'unità di indagine dell'economia industriale. Revista di Economia e Politica Industriale, 1: 7-14.
  6. Becattini, G. (1990), The Marshallian Industrial District as a Socio-Economic Notion. F. Pyke, G. Becattin, & W. S. (eds) içinde, Industrial Districts and Inter-firm Cooperation in Italy (s. 37-51), Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies. Becattini, G. (2002), From Marshall’s to the Italian “Industrial Districts”. A Brief Critical Reconstruction, A. Q. Curzio, & M. Fortis içinde, Complexity and Industrial Clusters (s. 83-106). Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag HD. Bekele, G. W., & Jackson, R. W. (2006), Theoretical Perspectives on Industry Clusters, Morgantown: Regional Research Institute West Virginia University. Belussi, F., & Caldari, K. (2009), “At The Origin of The Industrial District: Alfred Marshall and the Cambridge School, Cambridge Journal of Economics”, 3(2):335- 55. Braczyk, H. J., Cooke, P., & Heidenreich, M. (1998),
  7. Regional Innovation Systems, London: UCL Press.
  8. Boja, C. (2011),
  9. Clusters Models, Factors and Characteristics, International Journal of Economic Practices and Theories, 1(1):34-43.
  10. Boyer, R. (1990), The Regulation School: A Critical Introduction, New York: Columbia University Press.
  11. Camagni, R. (1991), Introduction: From The Local “Milieu” To Innovation Through Cooperation Networks. R. Camagni içinde, Innovation Networks: Spatial Perspectives (s. 1-9). London: Belhaven Press.
  12. Christaller, W. (1933),
  13. Central Places in Southern Germany, Çev.