Journals / Erzincan Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1-2

Notice of readiness in the maritime trade law

Deniz ticareti Hukukunda hazırlık ihbarı

Pages
313–352
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The charter party may contain a wibon (whether in berth or not) or time lost (time lost in waiting for berth to count as loading/discharging time) or whether free partique or not claus İf the loading/discharging berth is not available on the vessel’s arrival at or off the port of loading/discharging, the vessel shal be entitled to give notice of readiness on arrival there.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Once the vessel has arrived at the place for loading and is ready to load, notice of readiness can and must be given to the charterer This notice informs the charterer that the ship has arrived at the port and is ready in all respects to load or discharge.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Unless the charter party provides otherwise, notice of readiness may be oral.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The charter party may contain a wibon (whether in berth or not) or time lost (time lost in waiting for berth to count as loading/discharging time) or whether free partique or not claus İf the loading/discharging berth is not available on the vessel’s arrival at or off the port of loading/discharging, the vessel shal be entitled to give notice of readiness on arrival there.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Once the vessel has arrived at the place for loading and is ready to load, notice of readiness can and must be given to the charterer This notice informs the charterer that the ship has arrived at the port and is ready in all respects to load or discharge. Unless the charter party provides otherwise, notice of readiness may be oral. The notice of readiness is required for the initiation of laytime. For the notice to be effective, the vessel must actually be prepared to receive or to discharge cargo. The charter party may contain a wibon (whether in berth or not) or time lost (time lost in waiting for berth to count as loading/discharging time) or whether free partique or not claus İf the loading/discharging berth is not available on the vessel’s arrival at or off the port of loading/discharging, the vessel shal be entitled to give notice of readiness on arrival there.

Özet

Hazırlık ihbarı, geminin, yükleme veya boşaltma yerine vardığının taşı-yan tarafından taşıtanlara bildirilmesidir. Hazırlık ihbarı, gemin vardığı ve yükleme/boşaltmaya (yüke, denize elverişlilik gibi) tüm açılardan hazır ol-duğu anlamına gelir. Hazırlık ihbarı, çarter partilerde aksine bir hüküm yoksa, sözlü olarak verilir. Öte yandan, hazırlık ihbarı starya süresinin baş-laması için gereklidir. Hazırlık ihbarı verilebilmesi için geminin çarter par-tide belirlenen rıhtıma yanaşmış olması ve bazı formalitelerin yerine getiril-miş olması gerekir. Bununla birlikte, çarter partilere konan klozlarla bunun aksine düzenleme yapılabilir. Bu klozlar arasında wipon (gemi limanda ol-sun olması), wibon (gemi rıhtıma yanaşsın yanaşması), time lost (rıhtım beklenirken kaybolan zamanın staryadan sayılması) veya serbest pratika alınsın alınmasın gibi klozlar yer almaktadır. Bu klozlar gereği, geçerli bir hazırlık ihbarında bulunabilmek için geminin rıhtıma yanaşması veya bazı formalitelerin yerine getirilmesi aranmamıştır

🔖

Cite This Article

TÜYSÜZ, M. (2022). Notice of readiness in the maritime trade law. Erzincan Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1-2, 313–352. https://ajindex.com/articles/505556

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Andrewartha, Jane, “English Maritime Law Update: 2007”, Journal of Maritime Law & Commerce, July, 2008, s. 389-433.
  2. Andrewartha, Jane/Borrowdale, Kate, “English Maitime Law Update: 2002”, Journal of Maritime Law & Commerce, July, 2003, s. 413-450.
  3. Andrewartha, Jane/Hayhurst, Penny, “English Maritime Law Update: 1998”, Journal of Maritime Law & Commerce, July, 1999, s. 457-487.
  4. Andrewartha, Jane/Norris, Riley, English Maritime Law Update: 2001”, Journal of Maritime Law & Commerce, July, 2002, s. 329-370.
  5. Aspragkathou, Despoina, “Review of The Gencon Charter Clauses for the Commencement of Laytime: Analysis of The "Time Lost in Waitıng for a Berth yo Count as Laytime or Time on Demurrage" Clause”, Jourmal of Maritime Law Commerce, October, 2007 (Review of The Gencon Charter), s. 603-616.
  6. Aspragkathou, Despoina, “The Happy Day and Issues of the Invalidity of a Notice Of Readiness under English Law”, Journal of Maritime Law & Commerce, April, 2007, s.192 (Notice of Readiness), s. 191-214.
  7. Atamer, Kerim, “Bir Navlun Sözleşmesinde Yer Alan Whether In Bert Or Not Klozunun Uygulama Alanı ve Davada İleri Sürülmesi”, İstanbul Barosu Dergisi, Yıl: 1991, S.1, C.65, s. 60-94.
  8. Bulow, Lucienne Carasso, “Charter Party Consequences of Maritime Security Initiatives: Potential Disputes and Responsive Clauses”, Journal of Maritime Law & Commerce, January, 2006, s. 79-112.
  9. Burke, Raymond, J., “Admiralty Law Institute: Symposium on Charter Parties: Voyage Charters -- Special Problems”, Tulane Law Review, May, 1975, s. 937-956.
  10. Bush, Philip, “Charter Party Symposium: Delay and Detention”, 25 Tulane Maritime Law Journal, Summer, 2001, s. 441-468.
  11. Cromwell, A. Anderson, “Admiralty Law Institute: Symposium on Charter Parties: Time and Voyage Charters: Proceeding to Loading Port, Loading, and Related Problems” Tulane Law Review, May, 1975, s. 880-899.
  12. Çağa, Tahir/Kender, Rayegân, Deniz Ticaret Hukuku, C. 2, 8. Baskı, İstanbul, 2006.
  13. Demir-Araz, Yeliz, “GENCON (94) Sefer Çarteri Sözleşmesinde Sürastarya Klozu”, İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Yıl, 2004, C. 3, S. 5, s. 85-118.
  14. Felsted, Andrea, “Legal Focus: Good news from Appeal Court – but caution is stil”, Lloyd‟s List, 3 June, 1998.
  15. Gaisford, Robert, E., “Cancellation of Voyage Charterparties: A Comparison of Chinese and English Law”, Journal of Maritime Law & Commerce, April, 1996, s. 293-304.
  16. Hobbs, Chris, “Legal Focus: When NOR decisions support different views: When is a Notice of Readiness valid”, Lloyd‟