SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1

DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION OF TWO-TIER MULTIPLE CHOICE INSTRUMENT ON SOME CONCEPTS OF CHEMISTRY

BAZI KİMYA KAVRAMLARINA YÖNELİK İKİ KADEMELİ ÇOKTAN SEÇMELİ BİR TESTİN GELİŞTİRİLMESİ VE UYGULANMASI

Nurtaç CANPOLAT
Tacettin PINARBAŞI
Pages
55–80
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The test was conducted to a sample of 208 students engaged in chemistry teacher program, matter analysis of the test items was carried out and the misconceptions held by the students were discussed by evaluating their responses to the items.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to develop a two-tier multiple-choice instrument about evaporation, evaporation rate and vapor pressure and to investigate its applicability.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Later, based on the misconceptions idendified the two-tier multiple-choice diagnostic instrument consisting of 16 items was developed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The test was conducted to a sample of 208 students engaged in chemistry teacher program, matter analysis of the test items was carried out and the misconceptions held by the students were discussed by evaluating their responses to the items.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:buharlaşma · buhar basıncı · kavram yanılgısı

Abstract

The aim of this study is to develop a two-tier multiple-choice instrument about evaporation, evaporation rate and vapor pressure and to investigate its applicability. Firstly, with this aim, in the light of literaure students’ misconceptions were determined relating to these concepts. Later, based on the misconceptions idendified the two-tier multiple-choice diagnostic instrument consisting of 16 items was developed. The test was conducted to a sample of 208 students engaged in chemistry teacher program, matter analysis of the test items was carried out and the misconceptions held by the students were discussed by evaluating their responses to the items.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, buharlaşma, buhar basıncı ve buharlaşma hızı kavramları ile ilgili iki kademeli çoktan seçmeli bir test geliştirmek ve bu testin uygulanabili rliğini incelemektir. Bu amaca yönelik olarak, öncelikle, ilgili konularda öğrencilerin sahip oldukları kavram yanılgıları literatür ışığında tespit edilmiştir. Daha sonra, tespit edilen kavram yanılgıları dikkate alınarak 16 sorudan oluşan iki kademeli çoktan seçmeli teşhis edici test geliştirilmiştir. Geliştirilen test, kimya öğretmenliği programına kayıtlı 208 kişilik bir öğrenci grubuna uygulanmış, teste ait madde analizi yapılmış, ayrıca öğrencilerin teste verdikleri cevaplar değerlendirilerek sahip oldukları kavram yanılgıları tartışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

CANPOLAT, N., PINARBAŞI, T. (2022). DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION OF TWO-TIER MULTIPLE CHOICE INSTRUMENT ON SOME CONCEPTS OF CHEMISTRY. Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1, 55–80. https://ajindex.com/articles/505273

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Bar, V., Galili, I. (1994). Stages of children’s views about evaporation. International Journal of Science Education, 16, 157–174.
  2. Bell, B., Cowie, B. (2001). Formative assessment and science education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer. Birk, J.P., Kurtz, M.J. (1999) Effect of experience on retention and elimination of misconceptions about molecular structure and bonding. Journal of Chemical Education, 76, 124–128.
  3. Black, P. (1999). Testing: Friend or foe? London: Falmer. Black, P., Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7–74.
  4. Caleon, I.S. Subramanian, R. (2010). Do students know what they know and what they don't know? Using a four-tier diagnostic test to assess the nature of students' alternative conceptions. Res. Sci. Educ., 40(3), 313-337.
  5. Canpolat, N., Pinarbasi, T., Sozbilir, M. (2006). Prospective teachers’ misconce- ptions of vaporization and vapor pressure. Journal of Chemical Education, 83(8), 1237–1242.
  6. Canpolat, N. (2006). Turkish Undergraduates’Misconceptions of Evaporation, Evaporation Rate, and Vapour Pressure. International Journal of Science Education, 28(15), 1757–1770.
  7. Chandrasegaran A.L., Treagust, D.F., Mocerino, M. (2007). The development of a two-tier multiple-choice diagnostic instrument for evaluating secondary school students’ ability to describe and explain chemical reactions using multiple levels of representation. Chem. Educ. Res Practice, 8 (3), 293-307.
  8. Chang, J.Y. (1999). Teachers college students’ conceptions about evaporation, condensation, and boiling. Science Education, 83, 511–526.
  9. Chen, C-C., Lin, H-S., Lin. M-L. (2002) Developing a two-tier diagnostic instrument to assess high school students’ understanding – the formation of images by a plane mirror. Proceedings of the National Science Council, ROC (D), 12(3), 106–121.
  10. Chiu, M.H. (2001) Exploring mental models and causes of high school students’ misconceptions in acids-bases, particle theory and chemical equilibrium. Project Report in National Science Council. Chiu, M.H. (2002) Exploring mental models and causes of high school students’ misconceptions in acids-bases, particle theory and chemical equilibrium. Project Report in National Science Council. Chiu, M.H., Chiu, M. L., Ho, C.Y. (2002) Using dynamic representations to diagnose students’ mental models of characteristics of particles. Paper presented at the Asia Pacific Symposium on Information and Communication Technology in Chemical Education, Research and Develop