SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2

Gender Differences in Social Connectedness: A Meta-Analysis Study

Cinsiyetin Sosyal Bağlılık Üzerindeki Etkisi: Bir Meta-Analiz Çalışması

Seydi Ahmet SATICI
Gürhan CAN
Pages
1–18
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings were discussed in the light of the relevant literature and suggestions were made for future studies

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This meta-analysis was conducted to examine gender differences in social connectedness.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Systematic review and meta-analysis was reached 261 studies by literature search.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings were discussed in the light of the relevant literature and suggestions were made for future studies
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This meta-analysis was conducted to examine gender differences in social connectedness. Systematic review and meta-analysis was reached 261 studies by literature search. With regards to inclusion criteria, 19 studies were included in the meta-analysis and 20 effect sizes were calculated from these studies (N = 15.171; 8.620 females and 6.551 males). Meta-analysis indicated that there is a significant slightly effect in favors of women (k = 20, d = .13, p < .001). In moderator analysis revealed that age did not moderate significantly the relationships between gender and social connectedness, whereas cultural differences moderate the relationships between them. Effect size was significant but, it was just a small for individual culture, not for collective culture. The findings were discussed in the light of the relevant literature and suggestions were made for future studies

Özet

Bu meta-analizi çalışmasının amacı, cinsiyetin sosyal bağlılık üzerindeki etkisini ortaya koymaktır. Sistematik sentezleme ile gerçekleştirilen bu çalışmada önce alanyazın taraması yapılmış ve 261 çalışmaya ulaşılmıştır. Bu çalışmalardan araştırmacılar tarafından belirlenen ölçütleri karşılayan 19 bağımsız çalışmaya ait 20 etki büyüklüğü meta-analize dâhil edilmiştir (N = 15.171; 8.620 kadın ve 6.551 erkek). Meta-analiz sonucunda cinsiyetin sosyal bağlılık üzerinde kadınlar lehine düşük düzeyde anlamlı olduğu anlaşılmıştır (k = 20, d = .13, p < .001). Moderatörlük analizi sonucunda; yaş gruplarına göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir farklılık görülmezken, kültür açısından anlamlı bir farklılık olduğu saptanmıştır. Bireyci kültürlerde etki büyüklüğü düşük düzeyde ve anlamlı ancak kolektif kültürlerde etki büyüklüğünün oldukça düşük ve anlamsız olduğu belirlenmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular, ilgili alan yazın ışığında tartışılmış ve gelecek çalışmalara önerilerde bulunulmuştur

🔖

Cite This Article

SATICI, S. A., CAN, G. (2022). Gender Differences in Social Connectedness: A Meta-Analysis Study. Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2, 1–18. https://ajindex.com/articles/505086

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Abubakar, A., van de Vijver, F. J., Mazrui, L., Murugami, M., & Arasa, J. (2014). Connectedness and psychological well-being among adolescents of immigrant background in Kenya. In Global perspectives on well-being in immigrant families (pp. 95-111).
  2. Springer New York. Addis, M. E., & Mahalik, J. R. (2003). Men, masculinity, and the contexts of help seeking. American Psychologist, 58(1), 5-14.
  3. Adler, A. (1927). Understanding Human Nature. New York: Garden City Publishing Company, Inc. *Alam, A., Rafique, R., & Anjum, A. (2016). Narcissistic tendencies, forgiveness and empathy as predictors of social connectedness in students from universities of Lahore. Dialogue, 11(2), 136-157.
  4. Archer, J. (2004). Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: A meta-analytic review. Review of General Psychology, 8(4), 291-322. *Armstrong, S., & Oomen-Early, J. (2009). Social connectedness, self-esteem, and depression symptomatology among collegiate athletes versus nonathletes. Journal of American College Health, 57(5), 521-526.
  5. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497-529.
  6. Bem, S. L. (1984). Androgyny and gender schema theory: A conceptual and empirical integration. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 32, 179–226. *Betancourt, T. S., Salhi, C., Buka, S., Leaning, J., Dunn, G., & Earls, F. (2012). Connectedness, social support and internalising emotional and behavioural problems in adolescents displaced by the Chechen conflict. Disasters, 36(4), 635-655.
  7. Blackshaw, T., & Long, J. (2005). What’s the big idea? A critical exploration of the concept of social capital and its incorporation into leisure policy discourse. Leisure Studies, 24(3), 239-258.
  8. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L., Higgins, J., & Rothstein, H. (2005). Comprehensive meta-analysis version 2. Englewood, NJ: Biostat. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to MetaAnalysis. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and Loss: Separation: Anxiety and Anger (Vol. 2). New York: Basic Books. Can, G. (1989). Öğretmen Adaylarının Öğrencilere Yönelik Tutumları. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Yayını. Can, G. (1998). İlköğretimde rehberlik. İçinde A. Hakan (Ed.), Eğitim Bilimlerinde Yenilikler (ss. 109-123). Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi,
  9. Açık Öğretim Fakültesi Yayınları, No 559. Chen, L. J., & Chung, S.