Journals / Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2

Teacher Evaluation in Various Countries

Çeşitli Ülkelerde Öğretmen Değerlendirme

Pages
311–332
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, it has been determined that the areas that are based on the evaluation are similar to the “General competencies of teaching profession” used in Turkey.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of the study is to determine the similar and different aspects of the teacher evaluation system of various countries and the current trends in teacher evaluation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the research, it was determined that teacher evaluation is generally used for accrediting teachers, renewing contracts, increasing performance, career progression and making salary arrangements.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, it has been determined that the areas that are based on the evaluation are similar to the “General competencies of teaching profession” used in Turkey.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Öğretmen değerlendirme · Değerlendirme modelleri · Doküman incelemesi

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to determine the similar and different aspects of the teacher evaluation system of various countries and the current trends in teacher evaluation. Document analysis method was used in the research. In this context, countries like China, Germany, Portugal, Singapore, Turkey, UK, USA teacher evaluation systems were included in the study. Teacher evaluation systems of countries were analyzed according to document review criteria prepared by the researcher. In the research, it was determined that teacher evaluation is generally used for accrediting teachers, renewing contracts, increasing performance, career progression and making salary arrangements. Besides, it has been revealed that the teacher evaluation was repeated every year and carried out with education ministries. In evaluation process there are multiple participants such as administrators, teacher himself and peer teacher and multiple data collection tools like observation, interview, self-assessment and portfolio. At the end of the evaluation process, teachers are sent to education or they are rewarded. In addition, it has been determined that the areas that are based on the evaluation are similar to the “General competencies of teaching profession” used in Turkey.

Özet

Araştırmada çeşitli ülkelerin öğretmen değerlendirme sisteminin benzer ve farklı yönlerinin belirlenmesi ve bu doğrultuda da öğretmen değerlendirmedeki mevcut yönelimleri belirlemek amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmada doküman incelemesi yönteminden yararlanılmıştır. Bu bağlamda ABD, Almanya, İngiltere, Çin, Singapur, Portekiz, Türkiye gibi ülkelerin öğretmen değerlendirme sistemleri araştırma kapsamına alınmıştır. Ülkelerin öğretmen değerlendirme sistemleri araştırmacı tarafından hazırlanan doküman incelemesi ölçütlerine göre analiz edilmiştir. Araştırmada, öğretmen değerlendirmenin genellikle öğretmenleri akredite etmek, sözleşme yenilemek, performans artırmak, kariyer ilerlemeleri ve maaş düzenlemeleri yapmak gibi amaçlarla kullanıldığı belirlenmiştir. Bunun yanında ülkeler genelinde öğretmen değerlendirmenin her yıl tekrarlandığı, eğitim bakanlıkları tarafından yürütüldüğü, yöneticiler, öğretmenin kendisi, akran öğretmen gibi birden fazla katılımcının olduğu, verilerin gözlem, görüşme, öz değerlendirme, ürün dosyası aracılığıyla toplandığı, değerlendirme süreci sonunda öğretmenlerin eğitime gönderildiği ya da ödüllendirildiği belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca değerlendirmede temel alınan alanların Türkiye’de kullanılan “Öğretmenlik Mesleği Genel Yeterlikleri” ile benzerlik gösterdiği görülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

TAŞ, İ. D. (2022). Teacher Evaluation in Various Countries. Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2, 311–332. https://ajindex.com/articles/504954

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Avalos, B. and Assael, J. (2006). Moving from resistance to agreement: The case of the Chilean teacher performance evaluation. International Journal of Educational Research, 45 (4-5), 254-266. Bacharach. S. B. Conley. S. C. and Shedd. J. B. (1990). Evaluating teachers for career awards and merit pay. In J. Millman and L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), The new handbook of teacher evaluation (133–146). Newbury Park: Sage Publications. Borman, G. and Kimball, S. (2005). Teacher quality and educational equality: Do teachers with higher standards-based evaluation ratings close student achievement gaps? The Elementary School Journal, 106 (1), 3-20.
  2. Bridges, E. M. (1992). The incompetent teacher (2. Edition). Philedelphia: Falmer. Büyüköztürk, Ş. Akbaba Altun, S. ve Yıldırım, K. (2010). TALIS Türkiye ulusal raporu. Ankara: MEB Dış İlişkiler Genel Müdürlüğü. CSBE. (2012). (Connecticut State Board of Education). Recommendation for the Adoption of the Connecticut Guidelines for Educator Evaluation. http://www.sde.ct.gov/sde/lib/sde/pdf/pressroom/adopted_peac_guidelines.pdf adresinden 18.02.2015 tarihinde alınmıştır. Danielson, C. (2001). New trends in teacher evaluation. Educational Leardership, 58 (5), 12-15.
  3. Danielson, C. (2007). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching (1. and 2. Editions), Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD), Alexandria, Virginia. Danielson, C. (2011). Evaluations that help teachers learn. The Effective Educator, 4, 35-39.
  4. Danielson, C. and McGreal, T. L. (2000). Teacher evaluation to enhance professional learning. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. Darling-Hammond, L. (1990). Teacher evaluation in transition: Emerging roles and evolving methods. In L. Darling-Hammond and J. Millman (Eds.), The new handbook of teacher evaluation (p. 17-35). California: Corwin. Education Regulations. (2012). Education (School Teachers’ Appraisal) (England) Regulations 2012. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2012/115/contents/made adresinden 12.12.2012 tarihinde alınmıştır. Forster, N. S. (2006). The analysis of company documentation. In J. P. Scott (Ed.), Documentary research (p.83-106). London: Sage. French, R. Kuligowski, B. and Holdzkom, D. (1993). Teacher performance evaluation in the southeastern states: Forms and functions. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 6, 335-358.
  5. Georgia Department of Education, GDE. (2005). Georgia teacher evaluation program. Evaluation manuel. https://www.jackson.k12.ga.us/fs