SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 3

Planning and writing a scientific review

Bir Bilimsel Derlemenin Planlanması ve Yazımı

Arif ÖZER
Zeynep GÖRGÜLÜ
Pages
698–713
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Since there is a similarity between reviews and research articles, also, it is expected that both researchers writing reviews and the writers of research articles, will be supported about academic writing and provided new perspectives.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:A literature review can be defined as a critical examination of the literature.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Further, the risk of bias of traditional reviews and the thoughts that they just literature abstracts sorting increases this need.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Since there is a similarity between reviews and research articles, also, it is expected that both researchers writing reviews and the writers of research articles, will be supported about academic writing and provided new perspectives.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:derleme · derleme yazımı · literatür derlemesi

Abstract

A literature review can be defined as a critical examination of the literature. Literature reviews contribute to literature as a scientific text; for this reason, scientific reviews should go through a production process that is suitable for validity and reliability standards, as in research articles. However, for writing the scientific review, there is a need in terms of a traditional review, especially in Turkey Literature. Further, the risk of bias of traditional reviews and the thoughts that they just literature abstracts sorting increases this need. With this study, it is aimed to make a contribution towards eliminating the lack of resources in the literature. For this, a review study was conducted from publications for traditional review writing by using Scopus, Web of Science, EBSCO, and Google Scholar databases and libraries. In this study, by synthesizing literature from many disciplines, firstly topics related to the planning were included such as subject selection and goal determination, literature searching, evaluation, analysis, and synthesis, and then the structure of the basic parts of the scientific reviews such as summary, introduction, method, body, and result was explained. It is expected that this study contributes to the literature in terms of supporting the writing of traditional review and guiding new researchers as a beginning study. Since there is a similarity between reviews and research articles, also, it is expected that both researchers writing reviews and the writers of research articles, will be supported about academic writing and provided new perspectives.

Özet

Bir literatür derlemesi, literatürün eleştirel bir şekilde incelenmesi olarak tanımlanabilir. Derlemeler, bilimsel birer metin olarak literatüre katkı sağlar; bu yüzden, araştırma makaleleri gibi geçerlik ve güvenirlik koşullarına uygun bir üretim sürecinden geçmesi gerekir. Ancak derlemelerin yazımı konusunda geleneksel literatür derlemeleri yönünde, özellikle Türkiye literatüründe, bir ihtiyaç bulunmaktadır. Geleneksel derlemelerin yanlılık riskine açık olması ve literatürün sadece art arda sıralanması olarak sanılması bu ihtiyacı arttırmaktadır. Bu çalışmayla literatürdeki kaynak eksikliğini giderilmesine yönelik bir katkı sunulması amaçlanmaktadır. Bunun için Scopus, Web of Science, EBSCO ve Google Scholar veri tabanları ile kütüphanelerden yararlanılarak geleneksel derleme yazımına yönelik ulaşılan yayınlardan bir derleme çalışması yapılmıştır. Bu derleme çalışmasında, birçok disiplinden literatür sentezlenerek, öncelikle konu seçimi ve amacın belirlenmesi, literatür taraması, değerlendirmesi, analiz ve sentezi gibi planlamaya ilişkin başlıklara yer verilmiş, ardından derlemelerin özet, giriş, yöntem, gövde ve sonuç gibi temel bölümlerinin yapısı açıklanmıştır. Bu çalışmanın, derlemelerin yazımına ilişkin literatürü desteklemesi ve yeni araştırmacılara yol göstermesi bakımından derleme yazımına ilişkin başlangıç niteliğinde bir çalışma olarak katkı sunması beklenmektedir. Bununla birlikte, hem derleme yazan araştırmacıların hem de derleme yazımıyla benzerliğinden ötürü araştırma makalesi yazarlarının akademik yazım konusunda desteklemesi ve yeni bakış açıları sağlaması da beklenmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZER, A., GÖRGÜLÜ, Z. (2022). Planning and writing a scientific review. Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 3, 698–713. https://ajindex.com/articles/504882

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Aaron, L. (2008). Writing a literature review article. Radiologic Technology, 80(2), 185–186. http://www.radiologictechnology.org/content/80/2/185.short
  2. Aboujaoude, E., Savage, M. W., Starcevic, V., & Salame, W. O. (2015). Cyberbullying: Review of an old problem gone viral. Journal of Adolescent Health, 57(1), 10-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.04.011
  3. Agarwal, N., & Dewan, P. (2016). Writing a review article: Making sense of the jumble. Indian Pediatrics, 53(8), 715-720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-016-0915-z American Psychological Association (Producer). (2018). Journal article reporting standards: Qualitative research design. Retrieved from https://apastyle.apa.org/jars/qualitative
  4. Barczak, G. (2017). Writing a review article. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 34(2), 120-121. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12365
  5. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1997). Writing Narrative Literature Reviews. Review of General Psychology, 1(3), 311-320. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.1.3.311
  6. Bem, D. J. (1995). Writing a review article for Psychological Bulletin. Psychological Bulletin, 118(2), 172-177. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.118.2.172
  7. Bolderston, A. (2008). Writing an effective literature review. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, 39(2), 86-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2008.04.009
  8. Callahan, J. L. (2010). Constructing a manuscript: Distinguishing integrative literature reviews and conceptual and theory articles. Human Resource Development Review, 9(3), 300-304. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484310371492
  9. Callahan, J. L. (2014). Writing literature reviews. Human Resource Development Review, 13(3), 271-275. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484314536705
  10. Chambers, R., Gullone, E., & Allen, N. B. (2009). Mindful emotion regulation: An integrative review. In Clinical Psychology Review, 29(6), 560-572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2009.06.005
  11. Cochrane. (2019). [6]. In J. Higgins & J. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Retrieved from www.training.cochrane.org/handbook Crone, E. A., & Fuligni, A. J. (2020). Self and others in adolescence. Annual Review of Psychology, 71(1), 447-469. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050937
  12. Davidson, F., Rusak, B., Chambers, C., & Corkum, P. (2019). The impact of sleep restriction on daytime functioning in school-age children with and without ADHD: A narrative review of the literature. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 34(3), 188–214. https://doi.org/10.