Journals / Erdem / 2013 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 64

New language movement as pioneers of a new canon

Journal
Erdem
Pages
85–102
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In light of these qualities of canon, one can clearly see the breadth of the content of this canonic process and structure the New Language movement produced.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:National literary canon is an aggragate of the varying kinds of literary work about a nation’s story and as such it not only represent a nation’s identity, but also helps produce such an identity by instilling such national values in the public.The Literary Canon manifests itself during times of dissolution, prescribing the criteria for literary works, and it tries to build a future with the power of the past by conveying stories about that society’s origin, events of historic significance, and about its important people.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The strongest evidence for the contention that this movement had started a very strong and long canon in Turkish literature is the fact that its influence lasted well until the end of 1930’s, influencing other artists who do not fit the criteria of the movement per se.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In light of these qualities of canon, one can clearly see the breadth of the content of this canonic process and structure the New Language movement produced.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

National literary canon is an aggragate of the varying kinds of literary work about a nation’s story and as such it not only represent a nation’s identity, but also helps produce such an identity by instilling such national values in the public.The Literary Canon manifests itself during times of dissolution, prescribing the criteria for literary works, and it tries to build a future with the power of the past by conveying stories about that society’s origin, events of historic significance, and about its important people. The New Language Movement was founded in such social and political conditions. Their literary works, themed around nationalist ideas about origins of Turks and exalting imagery of the history of Turkey and its important people were composed in plain language with a simple rhyme structure and they were aimed at maintaining the society’s continuity via a national identity they wanted to instigate. The strongest evidence for the contention that this movement had started a very strong and long canon in Turkish literature is the fact that its influence lasted well until the end of 1930’s, influencing other artists who do not fit the criteria of the movement per se. In light of these qualities of canon, one can clearly see the breadth of the content of this canonic process and structure the New Language movement produced.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAZYEK, E. (2022). New language movement as pioneers of a new canon. Erdem, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 64, 85–102. https://ajindex.com/articles/504251

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (20)

  1. Alangu, Tahir (2010), Ömer Seyfettin Ülkücü Bir Yazarın Romanı, 2.b., Istanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
  2. Argunsah, Hülya (2010), “Millî Kimlik Olusturmada Edebiyatın Rolü ve Ziya Gökalp”, Türk Kimliginin Yeniden Insası Baglamında Ziya Gökalp, haz. Prof. Dr. Ünver Günay – Doç. Dr. Celaleddin Çelik, Istanbul: Kesit Yayınları Assmann, Jan (2001), Kültürel Bellek Eski Yüksek Kültürlerde Yazı, Hatırlama ve Politik Kimlik, Çev:Ayse Tekin, Istanbul: Ayrınrı Yayınları.
  3. Atakay, Kemal (2004), “Kanon Huzursuzlugu”, Kitap-lık, 68: 70-77.
  4. Bakhtin, Mikhail (2001),
  5. Karnavaldan Romana, Çev: Cem Soydemir, Istanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
  6. Bascı, Pelin (2008), “Yerli Edebiyat, Yurdun Edebiyatı; Herkes Onu Okumalı: Türk Edebiyatı Kanonu ve Ulusal Kimligin Sınırları”, Pasaj, 6: 44-69.
  7. Campbell, Joseph (2010),
  8. Kahramanın Sonsuz Yolculugu, Çev: Sabri Gürses, 2.b., Istanbul: Kabalcı Yayınevi.
  9. Bascı, Pelin, Joseph ve Moyers, Bill (2010), Mitolojinin Gücü Kutsal Kitaplardan Hollywood Filmlerine Mitoloji ve Hikayeler, Çev: Zeynep Yaman, 2. b. Istanbul: MediaCat Kitapları. Cebeci, Oguz (1995), Psikanalitik Edebiyat Kuramı, 2.b., Istanbul: Ithaki Yayınları.
  10. Çelik, Hüseyin (1995), Genç Kalemler Mecmuası Üzerinde Bir Arastırma, Van: Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Yayınları.
  11. Filizok, Rıza (1984), “Ömer Seyfeddin’in Eserlerinde Halk Edebiyatı Tesirleri”, Dogumunun Yüzüncü Yılında Ömer Seyfeddin, Istanbul: Marmara Üniversitesi Yayınları. Genç Kalemler Dergisi, (1999), haz. Ismail Parlatır – Nurullah Çetin, Ankara:, Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları.
  12. Göçgün, Önder (1995),
  13. Edebiyat Dünyası ve Atatürk, Ankara: Atatürk Kültür Merkezi Yayınları.
  14. Issı, Ahmet Cüneyt (2004), “Toplum Mühendisligi Baglamında Kanon-Edebiyat Iliskisi”, Hece (Hayat-Edebiyat-Siyaset Özel Sayısı), 90/91/92: 360-370.
  15. Jusdanis, Gregory (1998), Gecikmis Modernlik ve Estetik Kültür (Millî Edebiyatın Icat Edilisi), Çev: Tuncay Birkan, Istanbul: Metis Yayınları.
  16. Kahraman, Hasan Bülent (2010), “Çagdas Türk Siirinin Kanonu Yoktur; Çagdas Siirin Kanonu Olmaz…”, Notos, 24: 22-24.
  17. Kaplan, Mehmet (1984), “Bahar ve Kelebekler’in Tahlili”, Dogumunun 100. Yılında Ömer Seyfeddin, Istanbul: Marmara Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Yayınları.
  18. Kaplan, Mehmet, (1992), Türk Edebiyatı Üzerinde Arastırmalar 1, 2.b. Istanbul: Dergah Yayınları.
  19. Köroglu, Erol (2010), Türk Edebiyatı ve Birinci Dünya Savası 1914-1918 Propagandadan Millî Kimlik insâsına, 2.b., Istanbul: Iletisim Yayınları.
  20. Öksüz, Yusuf Ziya (1995), Türkçenin Sadelesme Tarihi G