Journals / Erciyes Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3

The Greenhouse Gas Emissions Produced From Turkish Livestock Production and Mitigation Options

Türkiye’de Hayvancılık Kaynaklı Sera Gazı Üretimi ve Azaltma Yöntemleri

Pages
185–192
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It can be concluded that there is a huge potential in Turkey to conduct studies on mitigation options of greenhouse gas emissions from animal production systems and their impacts on farm productivity and profitability

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The main greenhouse gases produced from livestock production systems and contribute to the global warming are methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The agricultural activities in Turkey contribute to %7 of the total national greenhouse gas emissions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It can be concluded that there is a huge potential in Turkey to conduct studies on mitigation options of greenhouse gas emissions from animal production systems and their impacts on farm productivity and profitability
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The main greenhouse gases produced from livestock production systems and contribute to the global warming are methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O). The agricultural activities in Turkey contribute to %7 of the total national greenhouse gas emissions. Methane emissions produced by ruminants via enteric fermentation are closely related with the amount of feed consumed; and digestibility and content of the feed. Apart from being hazardous for environment, CH4 emissions may also result in production losses from animal production systems. Methane emissions produced from livestock production systems are closely related to energy losses, and there is potential to re-gain some of the energy that is not lost through CH4 production in animal products such as meat and milk. Therefore, the greenhouse gas emissions, especially CH4 emissions produced from enteric fermentation should be mitigated. Research suggests that there are various mitigation options available to reduce the greenhouse gas emissisons from animal production systems. These include breeding animals that are more efficient converters of feed; using feeds with quality and high digestibility; considering a sufficient forageconcentrate ratio; the inclusion of mitigants such as fat and tannins into the ration; and strategic management of manure. However, it is important to note that in order for these options to be adapted by farmers and managers, their impacts on improved productivity should be proven. In addition, the cost of implementing a strategy should fall below its benefit. It can be concluded that there is a huge potential in Turkey to conduct studies on mitigation options of greenhouse gas emissions from animal production systems and their impacts on farm productivity and profitability

Özet

Hayvancılık işletmelerinde üretilip küresel ısınmaya etkisi olan başlıca sera gazları, metan (CH4) ve diazot monoksit (N2O)'tir. Türkiye'de toplam sera gazının %7'si tarım ve hayvancılık faaliyetlerinden kaynaklanmaktadır. Ruminantlar tarafından enterik fermantasyon sonucu üretilen CH4 gazı, alınan yem miktarı, yemin sindirilebilirlik oranı ve bileşimi gibi faktörler ile yakından ilgilidir. Bu gaz, çevre için bir tehlike unsuru olması dışında hayvanlarda verim düşüklüğüne sebep olması açısından da önemlidir. Hayvancılık işletmelerinde, CH4 gazı çıkışı, enerji kaybı ile ilişkilendirilmekte, CH4 gazı çıkışının azaltılması ile de dışarı salınmayan enerji işletmeye ürün, yani et ve süt olarak kazandırılabilmektedir. Bu sebeple başta enterik fermantasyon sonucu üretilen CH4 gazı olmakla birlikte sera gazları yayılımının azaltılması gerekmektedir. Dünyada yapılan çalışmalarda, hayvancılık işletmeleri tarafından üretilen sera gazlarının azaltılmasına katkıda bulunabilecek pek çok seçeneğin olduğu bildirilmektedir. Bu seçenekler arasında yemden yararlanma yeteneği yüksek hayvan ırklarının yetiştirilmesi, kaliteli ve enerjisi yüksek yemlerin kullanılması, rasyondaki kesif-kaba yem oranına dikkat edilmesi, rasyona yağ ve tanen gibi mitigant özelliği olan katkı maddelerinin ilavesi ve stratejik gübre yönetimi gibi yöntemler vardır. Ancak bu yöntemlerin işletme sahipleri tarafından kullanılabilmesi için verim artışı sağladığının kanıtlanması ve uygulama maliyetinin getirisinden düşük olması gerekmektedir. Dolayısıyla, Türkiye'de hayvancılık kaynaklı sera gazı yayılımını azaltıcı etkisi olabilecek yöntemler ile bu yöntemlerin verimlilik ve karlılık artışına etkisinin araştırılmasına yönelik çalışmaların yapılması için büyük bir potansiyel bulunmaktadır

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZKAN, Ş. (2022). The Greenhouse Gas Emissions Produced From Turkish Livestock Production and Mitigation Options. Erciyes Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3, 185–192. https://ajindex.com/articles/503942

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Alford AR, Cacho OJ, Griffith GR, Hegarty RS. Jointly achieving profitability and environmental outcomes: methane abatement from genetic improvement in the Australian beef industry. Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society 50th Annual Conference. February, 8–10, 2006; Sydney-Australia
  2. Alper D, Anbar A. Küresel ısınmanın dünya ekonomisine ve Türkiye ekonomisine etkileri. DEÜ Sos Bil Ens Der 2007; 9(4): 15–54
  3. Beauchemin KA, Kreuzer M, O’Mara F, McAllister TA. Nutritional management for enteric methane abatement: a review. Aus J Exp Ag 2008; 48(2): 21–7
  4. Blaxter KL, Clapperton JL. Prediction of the amount of methane produced by ruminants. Brit J Nutr 1965; 19(1): 511–22
  5. Brentrup F, Küsters J, Lammel J, Kuhlmann H. Methods to estimate on-field nitrogen emissions from crop production as an input to LCA studies in the agricultural sector. Int J Life Cyc Ass 2000; 5(6): 349–57
  6. Brink C, Kroeze C, Klimont Z. Ammonia abatement and its impact on emissions of nitrous oxide and methane - part 2: application for Europe. Atm Env 2001; 35: 6313–25
  7. Brink JC, Hordijk L, van Ierland EC, Kroeze C. Cost-effective N2O, CH4 and NH3 abatement in European agriculture: interrelations between global warming and acidification policies. Expert Workshop on Assessing the Ancillary Benefits and Costs of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Strategies. March, 27–29, 2000; Washington, DC
  8. Brouwer E. Report of sub-committee on constants and factors. Blaxter KL. ed. In: Proceedings of the Third Symposium on Energy Metabolism. London: Academic Press, 1965
  9. Bryant RH, Walpot V, Dalley DE, Gibbs SJ, Edwards GR. Manipulating dietary N in perennial ryegrass pastures to reduce N losses in dairy cows in spring. Edwards GR, Bryant RH. eds. In: Meeting the Challenges for Pasture-based Dairying. Proceedings of the 4th Australasian Dairy Science Symposium. Christchurch: Caxton Press, 2010; pp. 97–100
  10. Casey JW, Holden NM. Analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from the average Irish milk production system. Agr Sys 2005; 86: 97–114
  11. Clark H, Eckard RJ. Mitigating methane in a systems context. Edwards GR, Bryant RH. eds. In: Meeting the challenges for pasture-based dairying, Proceedings of the 4th Australasian Dairy Science Symposium. Christchurch: Caxton Press, 2010; pp. 78–85
  12. Czerkawski JW, Blaxter KL, Wainman FW. The metabolism of oleic, linoleic and linolenic acids by sheep with reference to their effects on methane production. British J Nutr 1966; 20(2):