Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2

Cementation of full ceramic restorations

Tam seramik restorasyonların simantasyonu

Pages
150–162
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Cementation of zirconium restorations may be carried out using either zinc phosphate or modified glass ionomer cements, but use of resin adhesion cements is often preferred as they cover marginal gaps better, their retentive capability is stronger and they increase the resistance of restorations to fractures

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Although metal reinforced porcelain restorations have been clinically used successfully for many years, the metal substructure that has to be covered with porcelain may result in unpleasant gray appearance especially at the margins.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Many full porcelain systems have been developed as an alternative to the metal reinforced porcelains to solve this problem.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Cementation of zirconium restorations may be carried out using either zinc phosphate or modified glass ionomer cements, but use of resin adhesion cements is often preferred as they cover marginal gaps better, their retentive capability is stronger and they increase the resistance of restorations to fractures
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Although metal reinforced porcelain restorations have been clinically used successfully for many years, the metal substructure that has to be covered with porcelain may result in unpleasant gray appearance especially at the margins. Many full porcelain systems have been developed as an alternative to the metal reinforced porcelains to solve this problem. The success of full ceramic restorations in serving for a long time in the mouth depends on the success of bonding between the ceramic, adhesive agent and tooth structures. Cementation of zirconium restorations may be carried out using either zinc phosphate or modified glass ionomer cements, but use of resin adhesion cements is often preferred as they cover marginal gaps better, their retentive capability is stronger and they increase the resistance of restorations to fractures

Özet

Metal destekli porselen restorasyonlar klinik olarak uzun yıllardan beri başarıyla kullanılmalarına rağmen porselen ile kaplanmak zorunda olan metal alt yapı özellikle marjinlerde gri renkte hoş olmayan bir görüntüye sebep olabilmektedir. Bu problemin çözümü için çok sayıda tam porselen sistemi metal destekli porselenlere alternatif olarak geliştirilmişlerdir. Tam seramik restorasyonların uzun dönem ağız ortamında başarıyla hizmet verebilmeleri seramik, yapıştırma ajanı ve diş yapıları arasındaki bağlanmanın başarısına bağlıdır. Zirkonyum restorasyonların simantasyonu çinko fosfat yada modifiye cam iyanomer simanlarla yapılabilir. Fakat marjinal açıklıkları daha iyi kapatmaları, tutuculuklarının daha fazla olması ve restorasyonun kırılma direncini arttırmaları gibi avantajlarından dolayı rezin yapıştırma simanlarının kullanımı tercih edilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZKAN, K. Y., ULUDAMAR, A., AYGÜN, Ş. (2022). Cementation of full ceramic restorations. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2, 150–162. https://ajindex.com/articles/452545

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Walton JN, Gardner FM, Agar JR. A survey of crown and fixed partial denture failures: length of service and reasons for replacement, J Prosthet Dent 1986; 56:416-421. 2-Diaz-Arnold AM,Vargas MA, Haselton DR Current status of luting agents for fixed prosthodontics, J Prosthet Dent. 1999; 81: 135-141. 3-McLaren EA. All-Ceramic Alternatives to Conventional Metal Ceramic Restorations, Compend Contin Educ Dent 1998;19:307-326. 4-Mount GJ. Glass-ionomer cements: past, present and future. Oper Dent 1994; 19: 82-90. 5- Türkoğlu P, Butlan Ö, Öngül D. Tam Seramik Restorsyonlarda Dayanıklılığı Etkileyen Faktörler İ. Ü. Dişhek Fak Derg 2010: 44; 45-53. 6-Blatz M. Long-term clinical success of all-ceramic posterior restorations, Quintessence Int. 2002 33: 415-426. 7-Öztürk AN. Farklı seramik inleylerin direkt, indirekt ve geleneksel tekniklerle dentine bağlanma dayanımlarının karşılaştırılması, 2001,Doktora tezi, Konya. 8-Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Crispin BJ Dental luting agents: A review of the current literature, J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80: 280-301 9-Li ZC, White SS. Mechanical properties of dental luting cements, J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81: 597- 609. 10-Kumbuloğlu O, Lassila LVJ, User A, Toksavul S,Vallittu PK. Shear bond strength of composite resin cements to lithium disilicate ceramics. J Oral Rehab 2005; 32: 128-133. 11-Roulet JF. Degradation of Dental Polymers, 1987:
  2. Karger Publications, Basel; New York. 12-Phillips RW. Skinner’s Science of Dental Materials, 1991,W.B. Saunders Company, 9th Edition, Philadelphia. 13-Magne P, Belser U. Bonded porcelain restorations in the anterior dentition: a biomimetic approach, 2002,Quintessence Publishing Co. Inc. 14-Blatz MB, Sadan A, Kern M.Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of literature, J Prosthet Dent 2003;89: 268-274. 15-Öztürk Ö, Uludağ B. Kompozit rezin esaslı yapıştırma simanları ve adeziv simantasyon tekniği, TDB dergisi 2002; 66: 33-39 16-Davidson CL. Operatif dişhekimliğinde gelişmeler: geleceğe meydan okumak, Quintessence yayıncılık, 2006; 2: 161-172. 17-Ferrari M, Vichi A, Feilzer A. Operatif dişhekimliğinde gelişmeler: güncel pratik uygulamalar, Quintessence yayıncılık. 2006; 1: 95- 107. 18-Allen EP, Bayne SC, Becker IM, Donovan TE, Hume WR, Kois JC.Annual review of selected dental literature: report of committee on scientific investigation of the American Academy of restorative dentistry, J Prosthet Dent 1999;82: 27-66. 19-Üşümez A, Aykent F. Bond strengths of porcelain laminate veneers to tooth surfaces