Journals / Erciyes Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2

Determination of Antibacterial and Antioxidant Activities of Juniper (Juniperus oxycedrus L.) Essential Oils and Aromatic Water

Katran Ardıcı Meyvesi (Juniperus oxycedrus L.) Aromatik Yağı ve Aromatik Suyunun Antibakteriyel and Antioksidan Aktivitelerinin Belirlenmesi

Pages
88–94
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Besides, it was found that the effect of AW was not effective while EO suppressed the growth of Lactobacillus rhamnosus bacteria.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was to determine the antibacterial-antioxidant properties of essential oil (EO) and aromatic water (AW) obtained from Juniper fruit (Juniperus oxycedrus L.) and to investigate its possible use in animal husbandry.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Total phenolic compounds in EO and AW were observed as 5.25, and 1.82 mg gallic acid equivalent (GAE)/g, respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Besides, it was found that the effect of AW was not effective while EO suppressed the growth of Lactobacillus rhamnosus bacteria.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Katran ardıcı meyvesi · esansiyel yağ · aromatik su

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the antibacterial-antioxidant properties of essential oil (EO) and aromatic water (AW) obtained from Juniper fruit (Juniperus oxycedrus L.) and to investigate its possible use in animal husbandry. The EO and AW were obtained by means of distillation method from the Juniper fruit collected from Isparta province. Total phenolic compounds in EO and AW were observed as 5.25, and 1.82 mg gallic acid equivalent (GAE)/g, respectively. The highest phenolic compounds found were 77.89% α-pinene in EO and 55.43% α-cedrol in AW. The free radical trapping activity of EO and AW was found as 82 and 45.5% in 100 μl/ml, respectively. At total antioxidant capacity (TAC) analysis, this value was obtained as 27.61 mmol Trolox equiv./lt in EO and 5.54 mmol Trolox equiv./lt in AW. The MIC (Minimum inhibition construct) analyses, it was observed that EO and AW suppressed the growth of Staphylococcus aureus, E. Coli, Enterobacter and Salmonella bacteria in different concentrations. Besides, it was found that the effect of AW was not effective while EO suppressed the growth of Lactobacillus rhamnosus bacteria. In the preliminary study performed on calves (n= 5), adding EO and AW to milk did not have any negative effect on milk consumption. As a result of these findings, it was observed that both EO and AW had antibacterial-antioxidant activity. However, studies on live material will allow a better evaluation of the results and effects on live material.

Özet

Çalışmada katran ardıcı meyvesinden elde edilen yağ ve aromatik suyun antibakteriyel-antioksidan özelliklerinin belirlenmesi ve hayvancılıkta kullanım olanaklarının araştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Yağ ve aromatik su, Isparta ve çevresinden toplanan katran ardıcı meyvelerinden destilasyon yöntemi ile elde edilmiştir. Katran ardıcı yağ (AY) ve aromatik suyunda (AS) toplam fenolik bileşenler sırasıyla 5.25 ve 1.82 mg GAE/g olarak elde edilmiştir. En yüksek fenolik bileşen yağda %77.89 ile α-pinen, aromatik suda ise %55.43 ile α-cedrol olarak belirlenmiştir. AY ve AS’nun serbest radikal yakalama aktivitesi 100 μl/ml’de sırası ile %82 ve 45.5 olarak belirlenmiştir. Yapılan toplam antioksidan kapasite (TAK) analizi sonucunda bu değer AY’da 27.61 mmol Trolox equiv./lt, AS’ta ise 5.54 mmol Trolox equiv./lt olarak elde edilmiştir. Yapılan MİK (Minimum inhibasyon konstrasyonu) analizleri sonucunda AS ve AY’nin Staphylococcus aures, E. Coli, Enterobacter ve Salmonella bakterilerinin gelişimlerini değişik konsantrasyonlarda baskıladıkları gözlemlenmiştir. Bunun yanı sıra, AY’nin Lactobacillus rhamnosus bakteri gelişimini baskılarken AS’nin etkisinin olmadığı belirlenmiştir. Buzağılarda (n=5) yapılan ön çalışmada AY ve AS ilave edilen sütlerin tüketiminde bir olumsuzluk gözlemlenmemiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlar ışığında hem AY’nin hem de AS’nin antibakteriyel-antioksidan aktivitesinin olduğu gözlemlenmiştir. Ancak canlı materyal üzerinde yapılacak olan çalışmalar sonuçların daha iyi değerlendirilmesine ve canlı materyal üzerine etkilerinin belirlenmesine olanak sağlayacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZKAYA, S., ERBAŞ, S., IŞIK, A. R., KÖKNAROĞLU, H. (2022). Determination of Antibacterial and Antioxidant Activities of Juniper (Juniperus oxycedrus L.) Essential Oils and Aromatic Water. Erciyes Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2, 88–94. https://ajindex.com/articles/503702

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Alessandra LO, Roberta BL, Fernando AC, Marcos NE. Volatile compounds from pitanga fruit (Eugenia uniflora L.). Food Chem 2005; 99: 1-5.
  2. Aligiannis N, Kalpoutzakis E, Chinou IB, Mitakou S. Composition and antimicrobial activity of the essential oils of five taxa of Sideritis from Greece. J Agric Food Chem 2001; 49: 811-5.
  3. Angioni A, Barra A, Russo MT, Coroneo V, Dessi S, Cabras P. Chemical composition of the essential oils of Juniperus ripe and unripe berries and leaves and their antimicrobial activity. J Agric Food Chem 2003; 51(10): 3073-8.
  4. Aridogan BC, Baydar H, Kaya S, Demirci M, Ozbasar D, Mumcu E. Antimicrobial activity and chemical composition of some essential oils. Arch Pharm Res 2002; 25: 860-4.
  5. Caponio F, Alloggio V, Gomes T. Phenolic compounds of virgin olive oil: influence of paste preparation techniques. Food Chem 1999; 64: 203-9.
  6. Cavaleiro C, Rezzi S, Salgueiro L, Bighelli A, Casanova J, da Cunha AP. Infraspecific chemical variability of leaf essential oil of Juniperus phoenicea var. turbinata from Portugal. Niochem Syst Ecol 2001; 29: 1175-83.
  7. Chao SC, Young DG, Oberg CJ. Screening for inhibitory activity of essential oils on selected bacteria, fungi and viruses. J Essent Oil Res 2000; 12: 639-9.
  8. Djeridane A, Yousfi M, Nadjemi B, Boutassouna D, Stocker P, Vidal N. Antioxidant activity of some Algerian medicinal plants extracts containing phenolic compounds. Food Chem 2006; 97(4): 654-60.
  9. Dogan G, Hayta S, Bagci E. Composition of the essential oil of Juniperus excelsa (Cupressaceae). Duzce Univ J Sci Technol 2016; 4: 243-51.
  10. Elmastas M, Gulcin I, Beydemir S, Kufrevioglu OI, Aboul-Enein HY. A study on the in Vitro antioxidant activity of Juniper (Juniperus communis L.) fruit extracts. Anal Lett 2006; 39: 47-65.
  11. Ennajar M, Bouajila J, Lebrihi A, Mathieu F, Abderraba M, Raies A, Romdhane M. Chemical composition and antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of essential oils and various extracts of Juniperus phoenicea L. (Cupressaceae). J Food Sci 2009; 74(7): M364-M371. Erel O. A new automated colorimetric method for measuring total oxidant status. Clin Chem 2005; 38: 1103-11. Erel O. A novel automated method to measure total antioxidative response against potent free radical reactions. Clin Biochem 2004; 37: 112-9. European Pharmacopoeia. Maisonneuve Sainte Ruffine, 1975; Vol. 3, P. 68. Food and Drug Administration of the US (FDA). Substances generally recognized as safe. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?fr