SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 3

Effects of Different Land Use Types on the Water Soluble Ion Content in the Soil

Farklı Arazi Kullanım Türlerinin Topraktaki Suda Çözünebilir İyon Kapsamına Etkileri

Remzi İlay
Yasemin Kavdır
Pages
367–375
Publication Date
2017-09-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

On the other hand, effect of land cover classes on other water soluble ions were not statistically significant (p >0.05).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Gökçeada is one of the most important places of Aegean Region and Turkey in terms of tourism and organic farming potential.
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to the Corine land cover classification (CLC), 17 land cover classes with different coverage areas are defined in the island.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:On the other hand, effect of land cover classes on other water soluble ions were not statistically significant (p >0.05).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Gökçeada · toprak · anyon

Abstract

Gökçeada is one of the most important places of Aegean Region and Turkey in terms of tourism and organic farming potential. According to the Corine land cover classification (CLC), 17 land cover classes with different coverage areas are defined in the island. In this study, 237 surface soil samples were taken from 9 different land cover classes with the largest coverage area, and the water soluble major anion and cation contents of the soil samples were determined by ion chromatography. Impacts of land cover classes on water-soluble chlorine, ammonium and calcium contents in the soil were statistically significant (p<0.05). On the other hand, effect of land cover classes on other water soluble ions were not statistically significant (p >0.05).

🔖

Cite This Article

İlay, R., Kavdır, Y. (2017). Effects of Different Land Use Types on the Water Soluble Ion Content in the Soil. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 3, 367–375. https://ajindex.com/articles/50341

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Altınbaş, Ü., Çengel M., Uysal, H., Okur, B., Okur, N., Kurucu, Y., S. Delibacak. 2004. Toprak Bilimi. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları No: 557, Bornova/İzmir. 355 s. Amezketa, E. 1999. Soil Aggregate Stability: A Review. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 14: 83-151.
  2. Armstrong, A.S.B., and T.W. Tanton. 1992. Gypsum Applications to Aggregated Saline Sodic Clay Topsoils. J. Soil Sci., 43:249-260.
  3. Baldock, J.A., Aoyama, M., Oades J.M., Susanto, R.H., and C.D. Grant. 1994. Structural Amelioration of A South Australian Redbrown Earth Using Calcium and Organic Amendments. Aust. J. Soil Res., 32:571-594.
  4. Barral, M.T., Arias, M., and J. Guerif. 1998. Effects of Iron and Organic Matter on The Porosity and Structural Stability of Soil Aggregates. Soil Tillage Res., 46: 261-272.
  5. Batjes, N. H., and Sombroek, W. G. 1997. Possibilities for carbon sequestration in tropical and subtropical soils. Global Change Biology, 3:161-173.
  6. Bayraklı, F. 1998. Toprak Kimyası. O.M.Ü. Ziraat Fakültesi Ders Kitabı. Samsun No: 26, 1. Baskı. 214 s. Bronick C.J., and R. Lal. 2005. Soil Structure and Management: A Review. Geoderma, 124:3-22.
  7. Chan, K.Y. and D.P. Heenan. 1999. Lime-Induced Loss of Soil Organic Carbon and Effect on Aggregate Stability. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 63: 1841-1844.
  8. Chapman, S. J. 1997. Carbon substrate mineralization and sulphur limitation." Soil Biology and Biochemistry 29 (2): 115-122.
  9. Chorom, M., Regasamy, P., and R.S. Murray. 1994. Clay Dispersion as Influenced By pH and Net Particle Charge of Sodic Soils. Aust. J. Soil Res., 32: 1243-1252.
  10. Cronin, S. J., Manoharan, V., Hedley, M. J., and P. Loganathan. 2000. Fluoride: a review of its fate, bioavailability, and risks of fluorosis in grazed-pasture systems in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 43(3), 295-321. European Environment Agency (EEA). 2010. Corine Land Cover, (CLC) 2006 Raster Data 100 x 100 m - Version 13 (02/2010).
  11. Gerakis, A., Rasse, D. P., Kavdir, Y., Smucker, A. J., Katsalirou, I., and Ritchie, J. T. 2006. Simulation of leaching losses in the nitrogen cycle. Communications in soil science and plant analysis, 37: 1973-1997.
  12. Haktanır, K. ve S. Arcak. 1998.
  13. Çevre Kirliliği. A.Ü.Z.F. Yayın, No: 1503. Haynes, R.J., and R. Naidu.1998.
  14. Influence of Lime, Fertilizer and Manure Applications on Soil Organic Matter Content and Soil Physical Conditions: A Review. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst., 51: 123-137.
  15. Hinsinger, P. 2001. Bioavailability of soil inorganic P in the rhizosphere as