SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 /

The Relationship between Sustainable Leadership and Perceived School Effectiveness: The Mediating Role of Work Effort

Şenay SEZGİN NARTGÜN
İbrahim LİMON
Ümit DİLEKÇİ
Pages
141–154
Publication Date
2020-02-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, it was determined that work effort did not have a mediator role in the relationship between sustainable leadership and perceived school effectiveness.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Öz This study investigates the mediator role of teachers’ work effort in the relationship between sustainable leadership and perceived school effectiveness.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The data was obtained from a study group of 411 teachers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, it was determined that work effort did not have a mediator role in the relationship between sustainable leadership and perceived school effectiveness.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anahtar Kelimeler Teacher · Sustainable leadership · Work effort

Özet

Öz This study investigates the mediator role of teachers’ work effort in the relationship between sustainable leadership and perceived school effectiveness. It employs the relational survey model. The data was obtained from a study group of 411 teachers. Three different measures were used in the study: “Sustainable Leadership Scale”, “Perceived School Effectiveness Scale” and “Work Effort Scale”. The findings showed that principals’ sustainable leadership scores were above moderate level except for social sustainability. On the other hand, teachers perceived their school as effective and their work effort above moderate level. It was also found that there were significant positive high and moderate level correlations among variables. Sustainable leadership predicted both perceived school effectiveness and work effort. Finally, it was determined that work effort did not have a mediator role in the relationship between sustainable leadership and perceived school effectiveness.

🔖

Cite This Article

NARTGÜN, Ş. S., LİMON, İ., DİLEKÇİ, Ü. (2020). The Relationship between Sustainable Leadership and Perceived School Effectiveness: The Mediating Role of Work Effort. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 141–154. https://ajindex.com/articles/50257

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Ahmed, Q. E. (2016). Ethics as a major element of sustainability in educational leadership across Finnish education. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Department of Education University of Jyvaskyla. Alanoğlu, M., & Demirtaş, Z. (2016). The relationships between organizational learning level, school effectiveness and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(4), 35-44. doi: 10.11114/jets.v4i4.1262 Argon, T., & Limon, İ. (2017). The Relationship between psychological climate and teachers work effort. 3 Rd Internatıonal Conference on Lıfe long learnıng and Leadershıp for All. 12-14.09.2017 - Lisbon, Portugal. Arovic, A. (2018). Sürdürülebilir liderlik uygulamaları ile örgütsel bağlılık arasındaki ilişki. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
  2. Ayık, A., & Ada, Ş. (2009). İlköğretim okullarında oluşturulan okul kültürü ile okulların etkililiği arasındaki ilişki. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8(2), 429-446.
  3. Avery, G. C., & Bergsteiner, H. (2011). Sustainable leadership practices for enhancing business resilience and performance. Strategy & Leadership, 39(3), 5-15. doi: 10.1108/10878571111128766 Balcı, A. (2014). Etkili Okul ve Okul Geliştirme: Kuram Uygulama ve Araştırma. Ankara:
  4. Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık. Balcı, A. (2016). Açıklamalı Eğitim Yönetimi Terimleri Sözlüğü. Ankara:
  5. Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
  6. Behling, O., & Starke, F. A. (1973). The postulates of expectancy theory. Academy of Management Journal, 16(3), 373-388.
  7. Brockner, J., Grover, S., Reed, T. F., & DeWitt, R. L. (1992). Layoffs, job insecurity, and survivors work effort: Evidence of an inverted-U relationship. Academy of Management Journal, 35(2), 413-425.
  8. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230-258.
  9. Bryne, Z. S., Stoner, J., Thompson, K. R., & Hochwarter, W. A. (2005). The interactive effects of conscientiousness, work effort, and psychological climate on job performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 326-338. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2004.08.005 Burns, H. L. (2016). Learning sustainability leadership: An action research study of a graduate leadership course. International Journal for t