Journals / Erciyes Tıp Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 1

Primer diz osteoartriti olan hastalarda fonoforez ve konvansiyonel ultrason tedavisinin etkinliğinin karşılaştırılması

Comparison of the efficacy of phonophoresis and conventional ultrasound therapy in patients with primary knee osteoarthritis

Pages
11–18
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: In the PH group, painless walking duration improved at all follow-up times except for week 2 (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To compare the efficacy of phonophoresis (PH) versus ultrasound (US) in patients with primary knee osteoarthritis (OA).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Acoustic gel containing no pharmacological agent was applied in the US group, whereas a gel containing 1.16% diclofenac diethylamonium was applied in the PH group for 10 sessions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: In the PH group, painless walking duration improved at all follow-up times except for week 2 (p
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy of phonophoresis (PH) versus ultrasound (US) in patients with primary knee osteoarthritis (OA). Materials and Methods: Forty patients were divided into two groups as PH and US. Acoustic gel containing no pharmacological agent was applied in the US group, whereas a gel containing 1.16% diclofenac diethylamonium was applied in the PH group for 10 sessions. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscale and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were used for the assessment of pain. The WOMAC physical function subscale, Lequesne functional index and Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) were used for the assessment of physical activities. Patients were assessed for a 3 month follow-up period. Results: In the PH group, painless walking duration improved at all follow-up times except for week 2 (p

Özet

Amaç: Primer diz osteoartriti (OA) olan hastalarda ultrason (US) ve fonoforez (FF) etkinliğini karşılaştırmak. Materyal ve Metot: Kırk hasta FF ve US şeklinde iki gruba ayrıldı. Farmakolojik ajan içermeyen akustik jel US grubuna uygulanırken %1.16 diklofenak dietilamonium içeren bir jel FF grubuna 10 seans uygulandı. Western Ontario ve McMaster Üniversiteleri Osteoartrit İndeksi (WOMAC) ağrı alt skalası ve Visual Analog Skalası (VAS) ağrı değerlendirmesi için kullanıldı. WOMAC fiziksel fonksiyon alt skalası, Lequesne fonksiyonel indeks ve Stanford Sağlık Değerlendirme Anketi (HAQ) fiziksel aktivitelerin değerlendirilmesi için kullanıldı. Hastalar 3 aylık takip periyodunda değerlendirildi. Bulgular: FF grubunda, ağrısız yürüme süresi 2. hafta hariç tüm takip zamanlarında düzeldi (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇAĞLAYAN, M., GÜR, A., OKTAYOĞLU, P., EM, S., ÇEVİK, F., YARDIMEDEN, İ., NAS, K., BOZKURT, M., UÇAR, D. (2022). Primer diz osteoartriti olan hastalarda fonoforez ve konvansiyonel ultrason tedavisinin etkinliğinin karşılaştırılması. Erciyes Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 1, 11–18. https://ajindex.com/articles/502359

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Mow VC, Setton LA, Fuilak F, Ratcliffe A. Mechanical factors in articular cartilage and their role in osteoarthritis. In: Kuettner KE, Goldberg VM, editors. Osteoarthritic disorders. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Resomont; 1995.p.147-72
  2. Poole AR. Imbalances of anabolism and catabolism of cartilage matrix components in osteoarthritis. In: Kuettner KE, Goldberg VM, editors. Osteoarthritic disorders. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; Rosemont; 1995.p.247-60
  3. Recommendations for the medical management of osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. American College of Rheumatology subcommit- tee on osteoarthritis guidelines. 2000 update. Arthritis Rheum 2000; 43(9): 1905-15. [CrossRef] 4. Griffin MR, Ray WA, Schaffner W. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug use and death from peptic ulcer in elderly persons. Ann Intern Med 1988; 109(5): 359-63. [CrossRef] 5. Griffin MR, Piper JM, Daugherty JR, Snowden M, Ray WA. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and increased risk for peptic ulcer disease in elderly persons. Ann Intern Med 1991; 114(4): 257-63. [CrossRef] 6. Turajene T, Wongbunnak R, Patcharatrakul T, Ratansumawong K, Poigampetch Y, Songpatanasilp T. Gastrointestinal and cardiovascular risk of non-selective NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors in elderly patients with knee osteoarthritis. J Med Assoc Thai 2009; 92(6): 19-26
  4. Nuki G. Pain control and the use of non-steroidal analgesic anti-inflammatory drugs. Br Med Bull 1990; 46(1): 262-78
  5. Laporte JR, Came X, Vidal X, Morena M, Juan J. Upper gastrointestinal bleeding in relation to previous use of analgesics and non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Lancet 1991; 337(8733): 85-9. [CrossRef] 9. Bateman DN, Kennedy JG. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and elderly patients. BMJ 1995; 310(6983): 817-8. [CrossRef] 10. Rutjes AW, Nüesch E, Sterchi R, Jüni P. Therapeutic ultrasound for osteoarthritis of the knee or hip. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; 20(1): CD003132
  6. Ozgonenel L, Aytekin E, Durmuşoglu G. A double blind trial of clinical effects of therapeutic ultrasound in knee osteoarthritis. Ultrasound Med Biol 2009; 35(1): 44-9. [CrossRef] 12. Shin SM, Choi JK. Effect of indomethacin phonophoresis on the relief of temporomandibular joint pain. Cranio 1997; 15(4): 345-8
  7. Vlak T. Comparative study of the efficacy of ultrasound and sonophoresis in the treatment of painful shoulder syndrome. Reumatizam 1999; 46(1): 5-11
  8. Klaiman MD, Shrader JA, Danoff JV, Hicks JE, Pesce WJ, Fe