SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Endüstri Mühendisliği / 2007 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2

Design of pull/kanban production control systems using axiomatic design principles

Aksiyomlarla tasarım ilkelerini kullanarak çekme/kanban üretim sistemlerinin tasarımı

Mehmet Bülent DURMUŞOĞLU
Özgür KABADURMUŞ
Pages
2–28
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The design methodology is tested in two real life manufacturing systems for validity and findings are provided.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Lean production has become more important than ever.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The main component of lean production is pull/kanban production control systems, which are also designed and implemented for adapting to available manufacturing systems.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The design methodology is tested in two real life manufacturing systems for validity and findings are provided.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Lean production has become more important than ever. The main component of lean production is pull/kanban production control systems, which are also designed and implemented for adapting to available manufacturing systems. Adaptation efforts require extensive knowledge of design. In this study, a road map is developed for the design of pull/kanban systems using axiomatic design principles. Depending on the available manufacturing system characteristics, the design methodology denotes what kinds of kanbans are needed to use in regard to design parameters. The design methodology is tested in two real life manufacturing systems for validity and findings are provided.

Özet

Bir üretim sisteminin tasarımı ve işleyiş şekli, müşteriye verdiği hizmetin kalitesini belirler. Çekme üretim sistemlerinin tasarımı, bu amaç için önemli bir araçtır. Mevcut üretim sistemini çekme üretim sistemi olarak uyarlamak, önemli bir tasarım sorunu olarak ele alınmalıdır. Bu çalışmada, aksiyomlarla tasarım ilkeleri uygulanarak çekme üretim sistemlerinin tasarımı için bir yol haritası oluşturulmuştur. Adım adım ayrıntıya inilen bu tasarım, iki ayrı gerçek uygulamayla hayata geçirilmiş ve geliştirilmiştir. Gerek yol haritası ve gerekse uygulamalar, çalışmada derinlemesine açıklanmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

DURMUŞOĞLU, M. B., KABADURMUŞ, Ö. (2022). Design of pull/kanban production control systems using axiomatic design principles. Endüstri Mühendisliği, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2, 2–28. https://ajindex.com/articles/501249

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. BAXTER, J.E., MCKAY, A., AGOURIDAS, V. ve PENNINGTON, A., 2002, Supply Chain Design: An Application Of Axiomatic Design, Proceeding of Second Internatonal Conference on Axiomatic Design, June 10 – 11, 2002, Cambridge
  2. BONVIK, A.M., COUCH, C.E. ve GERSHWIN S.B., 1997, A Comparison of Production-Line Control Mechanisms, International Journal of Production Research, 35, 3, 789-804
  3. COCHRAN, D.S., EVERSHEIM, W., KUBIN, G. ve SESTERHENN, M, 2000, The Application of Axiomatic Design and Lean Management Principles in the Scope of Production System Segmentation, 38, 6, 1377-1396
  4. COCHRAN, D.S. ve REYNAL, V.A., 1996, Axiomatic Design of Manufacturing Systems, The Lean Aircraft Initiative Report Series, #RP96-05-14
  5. COTOIA, M. ve JOHNSON S., 2001, Applying the Axiomatic Approach to Business Process Redesign, Business Process Management Journal, 7, 4, 304 – 322
  6. DURMUSOGLU, M.B. ve KULAK, O., 2004, Aksiyomlarla Tasarım İlkelerine Göre Takım Çalışması Esaslı Ofis Hücrelerinin Planlanması ve Uygulanması, Endüstri Mühendisliği Dergisi, 15, 1, 16-34
  7. ERHUN F., AKTURK M.S. ve TURKCAN, A., 2003, Interaction of Design and Operational Parameters in Periodic Review kanban Systems, International Journal of Production Research, 42, 14, 3315-3338
  8. GAURY, E.G.A., PIERREVAL, H. ve KLEIJNEN, P.C., 2000, An evolutionary approach to select a pull system among kanban, CONWIP and Hybrid, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 11, 157-167
  9. GERAGHTY, J. ve HEAVEY C., 2004, A Comparison of Hybrid Push/Pull and CONWIP/Pull Production Inventory Control Policies, International Journal of Production Economics, 91, 75-90
  10. HEMAMALINI, B. ve RAJENDRAN, C., 2000, Determination of the number of containers, production Kanbans and withdrawal Kanbans, and scheduling in kanban flowshops- Part 2, International Journal of Production Research, 38, 11, 2549-2572
  11. HOUSHMAND, M. ve JAMSHIDNEZHAD, B., 2002, Conceptual Design of Lean Production Systems Through an Axiomatic Approach, Proceeding of Second International Conference on Axiomatic Design, June 10 – 11, 2002, Cambridge
  12. HUANG, C. ve KUSIAK, A., 1996, Overview of kanban Systems, International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 9, 3, 169 – 189 13. KIM, Y., 2004, A Decomposition Based Approach To Integrate Product Design And Manufacturing System Design, Proceeding of Third Internatonal Conference on Axiomatic Design, June 11 – 24, 2004, Seul
  13. KRISHNAMURTY, A., SURI, R. ve VERNON M., 2004, Re- Examinin