Journals / Endoskopi / 2013 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 1

Assessment of bedside index for severity in acute pancreatitis in a Turkish population

Yatak başı akut pankreatit şiddet indeksinin Türk toplumunda değerlendirilmesi

Journal
Endoskopi
Pages
5–10
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The bedside index for severity in acute pancreatitis score is valuable in predicting pancreatic necrosis in severe acute pancreatitis in Turkish patients

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background and Aims: Identification of patients at risk for severe disease early in the course of acute pancreatitis is essential to optimize management and to improve outcomes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: We analyzed retrospectively acute pancreatitis patients between January 1999 and December 2006.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The bedside index for severity in acute pancreatitis score is valuable in predicting pancreatic necrosis in severe acute pancreatitis in Turkish patients
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background and Aims: Identification of patients at risk for severe disease early in the course of acute pancreatitis is essential to optimize management and to improve outcomes. We aimed to assess the bedside index for severity in acute pancreatitis score as a predictor of disease severity in acute pancreatitis in a Turkish population. Materials and Methods: We analyzed retrospectively acute pancreatitis patients between January 1999 and December 2006. Bedside index for severity in acute pancreatitis, Ranson and computed tomography se- verity index scores were calculated. Clinical data, laboratory results, pancreatic necrosis, organ failure, and mortality were registered. Accuracy of the scoring system for predicting severity was measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Results: Of the 111 patients, 63 (56.8%) were female. The median age was 59.1 years. Of all patients, 23 (20.7%) had severe acute pancreatitis and 57.7% had biliary pancreatitis. Of patients with severe acute pancreatitis, 15 (65.2%) developed organ failure, 7 (30.4%) developed pancreatic necrosis, and 2 (8.6%) died. Bedside index for severity in acute pancreatitis generated similar area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values to those of the Ranson score in predicting severe acute pancreati- tis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the bedside index for severity in acute pancreatitis score to detect pancreatic necrosis was 0.60 (0.38-0.80) and for the Ranson score was 0.70 (0.48-0.87), with no sig- nificant differences. To predict pancreatic necrosis, a bedside index for severity in acute pancreatitis score >2 had a sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 57%, 69%, 44%, and 79%, respectively. The bed- side index for severity in acute pancreatitis score was not as good as Ranson and computed tomography severity index scores for predicting organ failure. Conclusions: The bedside index for severity in acute pancreatitis score was a useful method in a Turkish population for predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis, with the advantage of being simple and based on parameters ob- tained on the first day of hospitalization. The bedside index for severity in acute pancreatitis score is valuable in predicting pancreatic necrosis in severe acute pancreatitis in Turkish patients

Özet

Giriş ve Amaç: Akut pankreatitin erken evrelerinde şiddetli hastalığın belir- lenmesi uygun tedavi yaklaşımı ve iyi sonuç elde etmek için önemlidir. Bu çalışmada yatak başı akut pankreatit şiddet indeksi skorlama sisteminin Türk toplumunda hastalığın şiddetini belirlemede kullanılabilirliğinin değerlendi- rilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Ocak 1999 ve Aralık 2006 yılla- rı arasında akut pankreatitli hastaların bilgileri retrospektif olarak incelendi. Her hastanın yatak başı akut pankreatit şiddet indeksi, Ranson ve bilgisayarlı tomografi şiddet indeksi skorları hesaplandı. Hastaların klinik bilgileri, labo- ratuvar sonuçları, pankreatik nekroz, organ yetmezliği ve ölüm gibi bilgileri not edildi. Skorlama sistemlerinin etkinliğini karşılaştırmak için eğri altında kalan alanları (AUC) kullanıldı. Bulgular: Toplam 111 hastanın 63'ü (%56.8) kadındı. Ortalama yaş 59.1±16.4 idi. En sık akut pankreatit etyolojisi safra kesesi taşı (%57,7) olarak saptandı. Hastaların 23'ü (%20,7) şiddetli pankreatit olarak değerlendirildi. Şiddetli pankreatitlerin 15'inde (%65,2) organ yetmezli- ği görülürken, yedi (%30,4) hastada pankreatik nekroz saptandı. Ölüm sadece şiddetli pankreatitli iki (%8,6) hastada oldu. Akut pankreatitin şiddetini pre- dikte etmede yatak başı akut pankreatit şiddet indeksi skoru Ranson ile benzer AUC değerleri verdi. Pankreatik nekrozu belirlemede yatak başı akut pankrea- tit şiddet indeksi skoru için AUC değeri 0,60 (0,38-0,80) bulunurken Ranson skoru için bu değer 0,70 (0,48-0,87) olarak saptandı ve bu değerler arasında istatistiki bir farklılık bulunmadı. Pankreatik nekrozu belirlemede yatak başı akut pankreatit şiddet indeksi skoru > 2 için duyarlılık, seçicilik, pozitif belirle- yicilik ve negatif belirleyicilik oranları sırasıyla %57, %69, %44 ve %79 olarak saptandı. Yatak başı akut pankreatit şiddet indeksi organ yetmezliğini predikte etmede Ranson ve bilgisayarlı tomografi şiddet indeksi skorları kadar etkili bu- lunamadı. Sonuç: Yatak başı akut pankreatit şiddet indeksi Türk toplumunda akut pankreatitin şiddetini belirlemede kullanılabilen aynı zamanda başvuru- nun ilk gününde hesaplanabilecek parametrelerden oluşan ve basit olması gibi avantajları olan bir skorlamadır. Ayrıca Türk popülasyonunda şiddetli akut pankreatitte pankreatik nekrozu belirlemede de kullanılabilir

🔖

Cite This Article

ZARARSIZ, G., DOĞAN, S., SELÇUK, H., URUÇ, İ., AKYOL, L., ÇELİKBİLEK, M. (2022). Assessment of bedside index for severity in acute pancreatitis in a Turkish population. Endoskopi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 1, 5–10. https://ajindex.com/articles/501159

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Forsmark CE, Baillie J; AGA Institute Clinical Practice and Economics Committee; AGA Institute Governing Board. AGA Institute technical review on acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 2007;132:2022-44
  2. Cho YS, Kim HK, Jang EC, et al. Usefulness of the bedside index for severity in acute pancreatitis in the early prediction of severity and mortality in acute pancreatitis. Pancreas 2013;42:483-7
  3. Zeytunlu M, Akyıldız M, Tekeşin O, et al. Akut pankreatit olgularının kanıta dayalı tıp kılavuzları rehberliğinde incelenmesi. Akademik Gastroenteroloji Dergisi 2005;4:146-53
  4. Balthazar EJ, Robinson DL, Megibow AJ, Ranson JH. Acute pancreatitis: value of CT in establishing prognosis. Radiology 1990;174:331-6
  5. Wu BU, Johannes RS, Sun X, et al. The early prediction of mortality in acute pancreatitis: a large population-based study. Gut 2008;57:1698-703
  6. Papachristou GI, Muddana V, Yadav D, et al. Comparison of BISAP, Ranson's, APACHEII and CTSI scores in predicting organ failure, complications, and mortality in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2010;105:435-41
  7. Singh VK, Wu BU, Bollen TL, et al. A prospective evaluation of the bedside index for severity in acute pancreatitis score in assessing mortality and intermediate markers of severity in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2009;104:966-71
  8. Chen L, Lu G, Zhou Q, et al. Evaluation of the BISAP Score in Predicting Severity and Prognoses of Acute Pancreatitis in Chinese Patients. Int Surg 2013;98:6-12
  9. Gompertz M, Fernández L, Lara I, et al. Bedside index for severity in acute pancreatitis (BISAP) score as predictor of clinical outcome in acute pancreatitis: retrospective review of 128 patients. Rev Med Chil 2012;140:977-83
  10. Bradley EL III. A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis: summary of the International Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis, Atlanta, Ga, September 11 through 13, 1992. Arch Surg 1993;128:586-90
  11. Bollen TL, Besselink MG, van Santvoort HC, et al. Toward an update of the Atlanta classification on acute pancreatitis: review of new and abandoned terms. Pancreas 2007;35:107-13
  12. Petrov MS, Windsor JA. Classification of the severity of acute pancreatitis: how many categories make sense? Am J Gastroenterol 2010;105:74-6
  13. Stimac D, Mileti´c D, Radi´c M, et al. The role of nonenhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the early assessment of acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102:997-1004
  14. Kaya E, Dervisoglu A, Polat C. Evaluation