Journals / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / 2020 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 1

The Orthogonal Measurements Approach in Estimating Spleen Size on CT Images

Pages
5–10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The orthogonal measurements approach not only provides a high interobserver agreement, but also the diagonal diameter can be translated into ultrasound studies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:PURPOSE We aimed to find out which single measurement and/or linear regression model correlates well with splenic volume using the orthogonal measurements approach.
📊
Key Findings & Data:METHODS The study relied on retrospective analysis of 205 contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography (CT) examinations carried out in adult patients using a 320-detector CT system.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The orthogonal measurements approach not only provides a high interobserver agreement, but also the diagonal diameter can be translated into ultrasound studies.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

PURPOSE We aimed to find out which single measurement and/or linear regression model correlates well with splenic volume using the orthogonal measurements approach. METHODS The study relied on retrospective analysis of 205 contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography (CT) examinations carried out in adult patients using a 320-detector CT system. CT volumetry was conducted by a semi-automated, model and threshold based segmentation algorithm that enables voxel-based volume calculation of abdominal organs. The orthogonal measurements were carried out in axial sections by measuring the maximum diameters of spleen projected in sagittal, coronal, and transverse planes. In addition, we calculated the diagonal diameter of spleen, which is a derivative of orthogonal measurements. Statistical analysis included calculation of interobserver agreement on orthogonal measurements, followed by model building using linear regression analysis of the measurements. RESULTS The interobserver agreement between two radiologists was very strong for all orthogonal measurements (r ≥0.971). The highest model performance was detected with the diagonal diameter (r2=0.956), followed by the superoinferior diameter (r2=0.857). Agreement statistics revealed that the regression formula derived from the diagonal diameter outperformed that of superoinferior diameter. CONCLUSION The diagonal diameter appears to be the best parameter which correlates with splenic volume, whereas the superoinferior diameter can be an alternative in daily CT reporting practice. The orthogonal measurements approach not only provides a high interobserver agreement, but also the diagonal diameter can be translated into ultrasound studies.

🔖

Cite This Article

İMAMOĞLU, H., ZARARSIZ, G., ÖZDEMİR, M., ERDOĞAN, N. (2020). The Orthogonal Measurements Approach in Estimating Spleen Size on CT Images. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 1, 5–10. https://ajindex.com/articles/153191

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Chow KU, Luxembourg B, Seifried E, Bonig H. Spleen size is significantly influenced by body height and sex: establishment of normal values for spleen size at US with a cohort of 1200 healthy individuals. Radiology 2016; 279:306– 313. [CrossRef] Brant WE. Pancreas and spleen. In: Brant WE, Helms CA. ed. Fundamentals of diagnostic radiology. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, 2012; 720–733.
  2. Lodewick TM, Arnoldussen CW, Lahaye MJ, et al. Fast and accurate liver volumetry prior to hepatectomy. HPB (Oxford) 2016; 18:764–772. [CrossRef] D'Onofrio M, De Robertis R, Demozzi E, Crosara S, Canestrini S, Pozzi Mucelli R. Liver volumetry: Is imaging reliable? Personal experience and review of the literature. World J Radiol 2014; 6:62–71. [CrossRef] Pattanayak P, Turkbey EB, Summers RM. Comparative evaluation of three software packages for liver and spleen segmentation and volumetry. Acad Radiol 2017; 24:831–839. [CrossRef] Prassopoulos P, Cavouras D. CT assessment of normal splenic size in children. Acta Radiol 1994; 35:152–154. [CrossRef] Bezerra AS, D'Ippolito G, Faintuch S, Szejnfeld J, Ahmed M. Determination of splenomegaly by CT: is there a place for a single measurement? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 184:1510–1513. [CrossRef] Prassopoulos P, Daskalogiannaki M, Raissaki M, Hatjidakis A, Gourtsoyiannis N. Determination of normal splenic volume on computed tomography in relation to age, gender and body habitus. Eur Radiol 1997; 7:246–248. [CrossRef] Joiner BJ, Simpson AL, Leal JN, D'Angelica MI, Do RK. Assessing splenic enlargement on CT by unidimensional measurement changes in patients with colorectal liver metastases.Abdom Imaging 2015; 40:2338–2344. [CrossRef] Nuffer Z, Marini T, Rupasov A, Kwak S, Bhatt S. The best single measurement for assessing splenomegaly in patients with cirrhotic liver morphology. Acad Radiol 2017; 24:1510–1516. [CrossRef] Kucybala I, Ciuk S, Tęczar J. Spleen enlargement assessment using computed tomography: which coefficient correlates the strongest with the real volume of the spleen? Abdom Radiol 2018; 43:2455–2461. [CrossRef]