Journals / Endoskopi / 2018 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 3

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: Experience in a secondary level hospital

İkinci basamak hastanede perkütan endoskopik gastrostomi deneyimlerimiz

Journal
Endoskopi
Pages
95–98
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy can be per-formed safely in secondary level hospitals.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background and Aims: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy is the safest approach to enteral feeding in patients with an intact gastrointestinal sys-tem that cannot be fed orally.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective study with patients that had a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placed between September 2016 and October 2017 in the endoscopic unit at Bitlis State Hospital.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy can be per-formed safely in secondary level hospitals.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background and Aims: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy is the safest approach to enteral feeding in patients with an intact gastrointestinal sys-tem that cannot be fed orally. In this study, we assessed percutaneous en-doscopic gastrostomy indications, complications, and follow-up data in our secondary level hospital. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective study with patients that had a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placed between September 2016 and October 2017 in the endoscopic unit at Bitlis State Hospital. Results: Twenty-six patients were included in the study. Patients mean age was 64,23 years (18-101). Percutaneous endoscop-ic gastrostomy was performed in 11 (42.3%) patients due to cerebrovascular disease, in 5 (19,23%) patients due to dementia, in 3 (11,53%) patients due to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, in 1 (%3,84) patient due to neuro-Behçet’s disease, in 1 (3,84%) patient due to hydrocephalus, in 1(3,84%) patient due to acromegaly, in 1 (%3,84) patient due to electricity burn, in 1 (3,84%) patient due to Erb-Duchenne Muscular dystrophy, in 1 (%3,84) patient due to cerebral palsy, and in 1(3,84%) patient due to epidural hemorrhage. The mean follow-up period was 137.65 (4-388) days and 3 (11.53%) patients had complications: tube ejection, free air in the abdomen, and upper gastro-intestinal bleeding. No post-procedural mortality was observed, at 1-month mortality rate was 3.8%, and the 3-month mortality rate was 26.9%. Con-clusion: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy is the safest type of gastros-tomy for enteral feeding. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy can be per-formed safely in secondary level hospitals.

Özet

Giriş ve Amaç: Perkütan endoskopik gastrostomi, herhangi bir nedenle oral yoldan beslenemeyen ve gastrointestinal sistemi sağlam olan hastalarda ente-ral beslenmenin sağlandığı en güvenli gastrostomi çeşididir. Bu çalışmadaki amacımız 2. basamak hastanemizdeki perkütan endoskopik gastrostomi ta-kılma endikasyonlarını, işlem sonrası erken ve geç dönem komplikasyonla-rını ve takipleri ile ilgili verileri sunmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bitlis Devlet Hastanesi endoskopi ünitesinde Eylül 2016-Ekim 2017 tarihleri arasında perkütan endoskopik gastrostomi tüpü takılan hastalar retrospektif olarak incelendi. Bulgular: Çalışmaya 26 olgu dahil edildi. Olguların yaş ortalaması 64,23 (18-101) idi. Olguların 13’ü erkek ve 13’ü kadın idi. Olguların 11’ine (%42,3) serebrovasküler hastalık, 5’ine (%19,23) demans, 3’üne (%11,53) amyotrofik lateral skleroz, 1’ine (%3,84) nöro-Behçet, 1’ine (%3,84) hidro-sefali, 1’ine (%3,84) akromegali, 1’ine (%3,84) elektrik yanığı, 1’ine (%3,84) Erb-Duchanne Musküler distrofisi, 1’ine (%3,84) serebral palsi ve 1’ine (%3,84) epidural kanama nedeniyle perkütan endoskopik gastrostomi ya-pıldı. Olguların ortalama takip süresi 137,65 (4-388) gündür. 2 (%11,53) olguda erken dönem komplikasyon gözlendi. Bir olguda batın içi serbest hava ve bir olguda da üst gastrointestinal sistem kanaması gözlendi, ek ola-rak bir hastamızda, uyumsuzluk nedeniyle perkütan endoskopik gastrostomi kanülünü çekerek çıkardığı gözlendi. İşleme bağlı mortalite gözlenmemiştir. 1 aylık mortalite oranımız %3,8 ve 3 aylık mortalite oranımız ise %26,9’dur. Sonuç: Perkütan endoskopik gastrostomi enteral beslenme amacıyla yapılan gastrostominin en güvenilir yoludur. 2. basamak hastanelerde de güvenle uygulanabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞENLİKÇİ, A., KUZU, U. B., DEDE, F., FİDAN, K. (2022). Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: Experience in a secondary level hospital. Endoskopi, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 3, 95–98. https://ajindex.com/articles/501040

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Kusano C, Yamada N, Kikuchi K, et al. Current status of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in a general hospital in Japan: a cross-se-ctional study. J Rural Med 2016;11:7-10.
  2. Gauderer MW, Ponsky JL, Izant RJ Jr. Gastrostomy without laparotomy: a percutaneous endoscopic technique. J Pediatr Surg 1980;15:872-5.
  3. Gundogan K, Yurci AM, Coskun R, et al. Outcomes of percutaneous en-doscopic gastrostomy in hospitalized patients at a tertiary care hospital in Turkey. Eur J Clin Nutr 2014;68:437-40.
  4. Makwana HB, Kansal SV, Baldha M, Agarwal S. Percutaneous endosco-pic gastrostomy: Four years of experience of general surgery department at a tertiary care center at Surat. Int J Sci Stud 2016;4:171-4.
  5. Temiz A, Aslan OB, Albayrak Y, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic gastros-tomy: indications and complications. Akademik Gastroenteroloji Dergisi 2015;14:113-6.
  6. Senol Z, Karakas DÖ, Yilmaz I, et al. Perkütan endoskopik gastrostomi tecrübemiz: 64 olgunun değerlendirilmesi. Van Tıp Dergisi 2013;20:52-6.
  7. Bankhead RR, Fisher CA, Rolandelli RH. Gastrostomy tube placement outcomes: comparison of surgical, endoscopic and laparoscopic metho-ds. Nutr Clin Pract 2005;20:607-12.
  8. Sit M, Kahramansoy N, Tekelioglu UY, Ocak T. Our experience in per-cutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. JAREM 2013;3:66-8.
  9. Ekin N, Ucmak F, Oruc M, et al. Perkütan endoskopik gastrostomi uygulama sonuçlarımız: 113 olgunun değerlendirilmesi. Dicle Med J 2015;42:346-9.
  10. Akay MA, Yayla D, Elemen L, et al. Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastros-tomy; Experience of two clinics. Sakaryamj 2014;4:70-3.
  11. Zopf Y, Konturek P, Nuernberger A, et al. Local infection after place-ment of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes: a prospective study evaluating risk factors. Can J Gastroenterol 2008;22:987-91. Akkersdijk WL, van Bergeijk JD, van Egmond T, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG): comparison of push and pull methods and evaluation of antibiotic prophylaxis. Endoscopy 1995;27:313-6.
  12. Sarkar P, Cole A, Scolding NJ, Rice CM. Percutaneous endoscopic gast-rostomy tube insertion in neurodegenerative disease: A retrospective study and literature review. Clin Endosc 2017;50:270-8.