Journals / Endokrinolojide Diyalog Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 4

Comparison between the usage of ligasure, and traditional method in total thyroidectomy

Total tiroidektomide LigaSure kullanımı ile geleneksel yöntemin karşılaştırılması

Pages
167–171
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These results arise the idea that LigaSure causes effective and reliable hemostasis, shortens the surgery but when used near vital tissues such as recurrent laryngeal nerve, it can increase the risk of complications.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: The traditional method in thyroidectomy is time consuming, the application of electrocautery in this method can cause the dissemination of heat in neighbouring tissues.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and method: The files of the patients who had been applied thyroidectomy between October 2009 and September 2011 have been analysed in two groups: one is the patients who had their surgeries with the traditional method, the other is the ones who had their surgeries by using LigaSure.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These results arise the idea that LigaSure causes effective and reliable hemostasis, shortens the surgery but when used near vital tissues such as recurrent laryngeal nerve, it can increase the risk of complications.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction: The traditional method in thyroidectomy is time consuming, the application of electrocautery in this method can cause the dissemination of heat in neighbouring tissues. In order to shorten and ease the surgeries, many appliances have been used in bleeding control. LigaSure is the most widespread current electrothermal vessel sealing device. In the literature many different results have been reported. It was aimed to compare the causes to which total thyroidectomy is applied in the conventionel method with the cases thyroidectomy is applied by using LigaSure. Material and method: The files of the patients who had been applied thyroidectomy between October 2009 and September 2011 have been analysed in two groups: one is the patients who had their surgeries with the traditional method, the other is the ones who had their surgeries by using LigaSure. Results: In the LigaSure group among the patients below 45, the usage of anti-hemorrhagic agents was considerably high, average surgery time was considerably short. Temporary recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis in LigaSure group was considerably high. Though the proportions of temporary hipoparatiroidi and seroma in the LigaSure group was high, the difference was not meaningful statistically. Discussion: It was obtained in our research that the usage of LigaSure shortened the surgeries 6.9 minutes. We interprete that despite being considerable, the difference was below the expectations as a result of using non-cutting, old type LigaSure. In the group Ligasure was used, the rise in the recurrent laryngeal neural paralysis might have been due to its usage close to the nerves. In the surgery attempts after reaching this result we re using routine knots in this area. We think using more anti-hemorrhagic in Liga- Sure group stems from our using anti-hemorragic agent as a routine in the first period of the appliance and using the device in Berry Ligament, as well. These results arise the idea that LigaSure causes effective and reliable hemostasis, shortens the surgery but when used near vital tissues such as recurrent laryngeal nerve, it can increase the risk of complications.

Özet

Giriş: Tiroidektomilerde geleneksel yöntem zaman alıcıdır ve bu yöntemdeki elektrokoter uygulanması komşu dokulara ısı yayılımına neden olabilir. Ameliyat süresini kısaltmak ve ameliyatı daha kolay hale getirmek için kanama kontrolünde birçok cihaz kullanılmıştır. LigaSure günümüzde en yaygın kullanılan elektrotermal damar mühürleme cihazıdır. Literatürde cihaz ile ilgili çok farklı sonuçlar bildirilmektedir. Bu retrospektif çalışmada geleneksel yöntem ile total tiroidektomi uygulanan olgular ile LigaSure kullanılarak total tiroidektomi uygulanan olguları karşılaştırmak amaçlandı. Gereç ve yöntem: Ekim 2009-Eylül 2011 tarihleri arasında total tiroidektomi uygulanan hastaların dosyaları geleneksel yöntemle ameliyat edilenler ve LigaSure kullanılanlar olmak üzere iki grupta incelendi. Bulgular: LigaSure grubunda 45 yaş altındaki hasta sayısı, kanama durdurucu ajan kullanımı anlamlı olarak yüksek, ortalama ameliyat süresi anlamlı olarak kısa idi. Geçici rekürren laringeal sinir paralizisi LigaSure grubunda anlamlı olarak yüksek bulundu. Geçici hipoparatiroidi ve seroma oranları LigaSure grubunda daha yüksek olmasına rağmen, fark istatiksel olarak anlamlı değildi. Tartışma: Çalışmamızda Ligasure kullanımının ameliyat süresini 6.9 dakika kısalttığı saptandı. Farkın anlamlı olmasına rağmen beklenenden az olmasını çalışmada eski tip, kesici özelliği olmayan LigaSure kullanımına bağlıyoruz. LigaSure kullanılan grupta geçici rekürren laringeal sinir paralizisindeki artışın cihazı sinir yakınında da kullanmamıza bağlı olabileceğini düşünmekteyiz ve bu sonuçtan sonraki cerrahi girişimlerde bu bölgede rutin olarak bağlamalar kullanmaktayız. LigaSure kullanılan grupta daha fazla kanama durdurucu kullanılmasını aletin ilk kullanılmaya başladığı dönemde loja rutin olarak kanama durdurucu ajan koymamıza ve cihazı Berry ligamanında da kullanmamıza bağlıyoruz. Bu sonuçlar LigaSureun etkili ve güvenilir hemostaz yaptığını, ameliyat süresini kısalttığını ancak rekürren laringeal sinir gibi hayati yapılara yakın bölgelerde kullanımının komplikasyon riskini arttırabileceğini düşündürmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DERİCİ, H., YAMAN, İ. (2022). Comparison between the usage of ligasure, and traditional method in total thyroidectomy. Endokrinolojide Diyalog Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 4, 167–171. https://ajindex.com/articles/500746

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Kırdak T, Korun N, Özgüç H. Use of ligasure in thyroidectomy procedures: results of a prospective comparative study. World J. Surg 2005;29(6):771-774
  2. Parmeggiani U, Avenia N, Falco MD, et al. Major complications in thyroid surgery: utility of bipolar vessel sealing (Ligasure® Precise) G Chir 2005;26(10):387-394
  3. Yao HS, Wang Q, Wang WJ, Ruan CP. prospective clinical trials of thyroidectomy with ligasure vs conventional vessel ligation. A systematic review and meta-analysis Arch Surg 2009;144(12)1167-1174
  4. Petrakis IE, Kogerakis NE, Lasithiotakis KG, Vrachassotakis N, Chalkiadakis GE. Ligasure versus clamp-and-tie thyroidectomy for benign nodular disease. Head & Neck 2004;26(10):903-909
  5. Lachanas VA, Prokopakis EP, Mpenakis MA, Karatzanis AD, Velegrakis GA. The use of Ligasure Vessel Sealing System in thyroid surgery. Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery 2005;132(3):487-489
  6. Marrazzo A, Casa L, David M, et al. Thyroidectomy with LigaSure versus traditional thyroidectomy: our experience. Chir Ital 2007;59(3):361-365
  7. Kiriakopoulos A, Dimitrios T, Dimitrios L. use of a diathermy system in thyroid surgery. Arch Surg 2004;139(9):997-1000
  8. Albayrak Y, Kaya Z, Albayrak F, Aslan S, Öztürk M, Çelik S. Total tiroidektomide harmonik skalpel kullanımı ile konvansiyonel bağlama yönteminin karşılaştırılması. Journal of Dialog in Endocrinology 2010;7(2):68-71
  9. Lepner U, Vaasna T. Ligasure vessel sealing system versus conventional vessel ligation in thyroidectomy. Scandinavian Journal of Surgery 2007;96(1):31-34
  10. Sartori PV, Fina SD, Colombo G, et al. Ligasure versus Ultracision® in thyroid surgery: a prospective randomized study. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2008;393(5):655-658. 11.Pons Y, Gauthier J, Pons EU, et al. Comparison of LigaSure vessel sealing system, harmonic scalpel, and conventional hemostasis in total thyroidectomy. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery 2009;141(4):496-501. 12.Shen WT, Baumbusch MA, Kebebew E, Duh QY. Use of the electrothermal vessel sealing system versus standard vessel ligation in thyroidectomy. Asian J Surg 2005;28(2):86-89
  11. Brzezinski J, Markowska KK, Naze M, Strozyk G, Dedecjus M. Comparison of lateral thermal spread using monopolar and bipolar diathermy, and the bipolar vessel sealing system ThermoStaplerTM during thyroidectomy. Polski Przegląd Chirurgiczny 2011;83(7):355-360. 14.Marc OS, Cogliandolo A, Piquard A, Fama F, Pidoto RR. LigaSure vs Clamp-and-Tie technique to achieve hemostasis in total thyro