Journals / Turkish Journal of Surgery / 2017 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 1

A new approach in bowel preparation before colonoscopy in patients with constipation: A prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded trial

Pages
29–32
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This improvement was statistically significant in the female patient group with higher constipation rate.Conclusions: Use of enemas before purgatives in patients with constipation significantly improves adequacy of rightcolon cleansing.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Enema administration in the morning of routine colonoscopy is known to be useless.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients were compared in terms of age, sex, BMI,Rome III constipation criteria, history of abdominal surgery, tolerance to the preparation procedure, complicationsduring preparation such as nausea, vomiting, headache and dizziness, cecal insertion time, total duration of colonoscopy, polyp determination rate and colonic cleansing based on the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale.Results: One hundred two (44.9%) patients were male and 125 (55.1%) female.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This improvement was statistically significant in the female patient group with higher constipation rate.Conclusions: Use of enemas before purgatives in patients with constipation significantly improves adequacy of rightcolon cleansing.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: Enema administration in the morning of routine colonoscopy is known to be useless. However, the potential bowel cleansing effects of distal colon emptying with enema prior to purgatives are not known. The aim of thisstudy is to investigate the effects of enema use before purgatives in preparation for colonoscopy.Material and Methods: Two hundred twenty-seven patients were randomly assigned into three groups; enemabefore purgative use, enema after purgative use, and no enema. Patients were compared in terms of age, sex, BMI,Rome III constipation criteria, history of abdominal surgery, tolerance to the preparation procedure, complicationsduring preparation such as nausea, vomiting, headache and dizziness, cecal insertion time, total duration of colonoscopy, polyp determination rate and colonic cleansing based on the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale.Results: One hundred two (44.9%) patients were male and 125 (55.1%) female. The mean age and BMI was 55.4±11.8 yearsand 28.8±4.7, respectively. No difference was observed between the groups in terms of sex, age, or BMI. The number offulfilled Rome criteria and of previous abdominal surgeries were significantly higher in females than in men. Right colonBoston Bowel Preparation Scale score was higher in the group using enemas before purgatives than the scores of othergroups. This improvement was statistically significant in the female patient group with higher constipation rate.Conclusions: Use of enemas before purgatives in patients with constipation significantly improves adequacy of rightcolon cleansing.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDAR, M., YAMAN, İ., BAŞBUĞ, M., ÇAVDAR, F., TOPFEDAİSİ, H., DERİCİ, H. (2017). A new approach in bowel preparation before colonoscopy in patients with constipation: A prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded trial. Turkish Journal of Surgery, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 1, 29–32. https://ajindex.com/articles/390503

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Kao D, Lalor E, Sandha G, Fedorak RN, van der Knoop B, Doornweerd S, et al. A randomized controlled trial of four precolonoscopy bowel cleansing regimens. Can J Gastroenterol 2011; 25: 657-662. [CrossRef] Wexner SD, Beck DE, Baron TH, Fanelli RD, Hyman N, Shen B, et al. A consensus document on bowel preparation before colonoscopy: prepared by a task force from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS), the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES). Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: 894-909. [CrossRef] Radaelli F, Meucci G, Imperiali G, Spinzi G, Strocchi E, Terruzzi V, et al. High-dose senna compared with conventional PEG-ES lavage as bowel preparation for elective colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2005; 100: 2674-2680. [CrossRef] Lever EL, Walter MH, Condon SC, Balasubramaniam K, Chen YK, Mitchell RD, et al. Addition of enemas to oral lavage preparation for colonoscopy is not necessary. Gastrointest Endosc 1992; 38: 369-372. [CrossRef] Sloots CE, Felt-Bersma RJ. Effect of bowel cleansing on colonic transit in constipation due to slow transit or evacuation disorder. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2002; 14: 55-61. [CrossRef] Drossman DA, Dumitrascu DL. Rome III: New standard for functional gastrointestinal disorders. Journal of gastrointestinal and liver diseases: J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 2006; 15: 237-241.
  2. Lai EJ, Calderwood AH, Doros G, Fix OK, Jacobson BC. The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopyoriented research. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 620-625. [CrossRef] Ayaz S, Hisar F. The efficacy of education programme for preventing constipation in women. Int J Nurs Pract 2014; 20: 275-282. [CrossRef] Beck DE, Harford FJ, DiPalma JA. Comparison of cleansing methods in preparation for colonic surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 1985; 28: 491-495. [CrossRef] Soweid AM, Kobeissy AA, Jamali FR, El-Tarchichi M, Skoury A, AbdulBaki H, et al. A randomized single-blind trial of standard diet versus fiber-free diet with polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution for colonoscopy preparation. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 633-638. [CrossRef] Puckett J, Soop M. Optimizing colonoscopy preparation: the role of dosage, timing and diet. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2012; 15: 499-504. [CrossRef] Davis GR, Santa Ana CA, Morawski SG, Fordtran JS. Development of a lavage solution associated with minimal w