Journals / Ekonomik Yaklaşım / 2011 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 78

Labour market regulations and regulation trends in the oecd countries

Oecd ülkelerinde işgücü piyasası regülasyonları ve regülasyonlardaki eğilimler

Pages
91–118
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The relative rigidity of the European labor market remains, despite there has been a deregulation trend driven and structured by the concept of "flexicurity ".

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:By the 1980's. (he end of Keynesian demand side policies and more competitive markets of the globalizing world are responsible for the growing need to decrease the labour costs.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The process of establishing more flexible labour markets by deregulations in the OECD countries rtm relatively faster than it is after the middle of İ990's.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The relative rigidity of the European labor market remains, despite there has been a deregulation trend driven and structured by the concept of "flexicurity ".
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

By the 1980's. (he end of Keynesian demand side policies and more competitive markets of the globalizing world are responsible for the growing need to decrease the labour costs. On the other hand, shifting of the sectoral structure of employment is also responsible for the new regulations in the labour market. The process of establishing more flexible labour markets by deregulations in the OECD countries rtm relatively faster than it is after the middle of İ990's. The process is slower after the 2000's. Especially atypical employment, fixed time contracts, temporary work agencies, and tempora/y employment has been the main deregulation areas. The relatively rigid labour markets of the EU compared to USA labour market is found to be responsible for the high unemployment ratios respectively. The relative rigidity of the European labor market remains, despite there has been a deregulation trend driven and structured by the concept of "flexicurity ".

Özet

1980’lerle birlikte Keynesyen talep yönlü politikaların terk edilmesi ve hızlanan küreselleşmenin etkisiyle artan rekabet koşulları, işgücü maliyetlerinin düşürülmesi gerekliliğini beraberinde getirmiştir. Diğer taraftan, istihdamın sektörel yapısında meydana gelen değişim de yeni düzenlemelerin yapılmasını gerekli kılmıştır. OECD ülkelerinde işgücü piyasasının deregülasyonlarla daha esnek hale gelmesi 1990’ların ortalarına kadar kadar hızlı bir düzenleme süreci ile gerçekleşmiş, bu süreç 2000’lere gelindiğinde yavaşlamıştır. Özellikle atipik çalışma koşulları, belirli süreli iş sözleşmelerine uygulama kolaylıkları, geçici iş ajanslarının uygulama alanı ve geçici istihdam uygulamaları konularında deregülasyona gidildiği görülmektedir. Yakın tarihe kadar Avrupa Birliği’nde ABD’ye göre yüksek seyreden işsizlik oranlarının nedeni olarak gösterilen katı düzenlemeler, yerini “güvenceli esneklik” kavramı çerçevesinde şekillenen deregülasyonlara bırakmış olsa da, Avrupa işgücü piyasası göreli katı yapısını muhafaza etmektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇİFTÇİ, C., AYKAÇ, G. (2022). Labour market regulations and regulation trends in the oecd countries. Ekonomik Yaklaşım, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 78, 91–118. https://ajindex.com/articles/499697

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. ADDISON, John ve HIRSCH, Barty (1997), "Tlıe Economic Effects of Employment Regulation: What are the Limits", Government Regulation of the Employment Relationship, Bruce Kaufman (ed.), IRRA 50th Anniversary Volume, Madison, WI: Industrial Relations Research Association, 127-178.
  2. AMABLE, Bruno, DEMMOU, Lilas ve GATTI, Donatella (2007), "Employment Performance and Institutions: New Answers to an Old Question", IZA Discussion Paper 2731. AYKAÇ, Gökhan (2010), İşgücü Piyasalarına Yönelik Regülasyonların İşgücü Arz ve Talebi Özerine Etkileri: Türkiye Özerine Bir İnceleme, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi,
  3. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara, 2010.
  4. BENTOLILA, Samuel ve BERTOLA, Giuseppe (1990), "Firing Costs and Labor Demand: How Bad is eurosclerosis", Review of Economic Studies, C. 57, S. 3,381 -402. BETCHERMAN, Gordon, Amy LUINSTRA ve Makoto OGAWA (2001), "Labor Market Regulation: International Experiance İn Promoting Employment and Social Protection", Social Protection Discussion Paper Series, No: 0128, The World Bank. BERTOLA, Giuseppe (2003), "Distribution, Efficiency and Labor Market Regulation: Theory, OECD, Latin America", 7th Annual Conference, Central Bank of Chile, Santiago. BLANCHARD, Oliver ve SUMMERS, Lawrence (1986), "Hysterisis and the Euroipean Unemployment Problem", NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1986, Volume 1, MIT Press, S. 15 - 90. BLANCHARD, Oliver ve WOLFERS, Justin (2000), "The Role of Shocks and Institutions in the Rise of European Unemployment: The Aggregate Evidence", The Economic Journal, C. 110, S. 462, 1- 33. BOERI, Tito, NICOTELLI, Giuseppe ve SCARPETTA, Stefano (2000), "Regulation and Labour Market Performance", Regulatoiy Reform, Market Functioning and Competitiveness, Ed. G. Gallİ ve J. Pelksman. BORLAND, Jeff (2005), "Impacts of Employment Regulation: Towards an Evaluation Framework", MinisUy of Economic Development Occasional Paper 06/07, New Zealand. BOTERO Juan C., DJANICOV, Simeon, LA PORTA, Rafael, LOPEZ-DE-SILANES, Florencio ve SHLEIFER, Andrei (2004), "The Regulation of Labor", The Quarterly Journal of Economics, C. 119, S. 4, 1339 - 1382. BOZKAYA, Ant ve ICERR, William R. (2008), "Labor Regulations and European Industrial Specialization: Evidence From Private Equity Investments", HBS Working Paper 08 - 043. BRANDT, Nicola, BURNIAUX, Jean-Marc ve DUVAL, Romain (2005), "Assessing the OECD Jobs Strategy", OECD Economics Working Paper 429. CAZES, Sandrine ve NESPOROVA, Alena (2003), "Employment Protection Legislation