SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ekonomik Yaklaşım / 2012 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 82

The position of the working class across the public sector budget in Turkey: 2004-2010

Türkiye'de emek kesiminin kamu bütçesi karşısındaki konumu:

Yakup KARABACAK
Pages
51–77
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The second result is that the working class is in a position of net tax payer in the face of the public budget.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the net financial position against the public budget of the working class in Turkey is tried to be determined.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Findings obtained show that the working class in Turkey has benefited from public expenditure significantly.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The second result is that the working class is in a position of net tax payer in the face of the public budget.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, the net financial position against the public budget of the working class in Turkey is tried to be determined. For this purpose, of the cost-benefit analysis used in order to find out the relationship between the working class and the public budget. Findings obtained show that the working class in Turkey has benefited from public expenditure significantly. However, the revenues transferred by the working class are more than the amount of public expenditure that it benefited from the public budget. In this case, two results pertaining the working class are: The first one is that, during the period under review, wage income is the funding source of the social wage, in other words this class funds the public services and expenditures, it derives from the budget. The second result is that the working class is in a position of net tax payer in the face of the public budget.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, Türkiye'de emek kesiminin kamu bütçesi karşısındaki nihai mali pozisyonu saptanmaya çalışılmıştır. Bu amaçla emek kesiminin kamu bütçesi ile olan ilişkisinin fayda-maliyet analizi yapılmıştır. Ulaşılan bulgular, Türkiye 'de emek kesiminin kamu harcamalarından önemli ölçüde faydalandığını göstermektedir. Ancak kamu bütçesine aktardığı kaynaklar da dikkate atandığında, emek kesiminin kamu bütçesi karşısındaki konumu değişmektedir. Zira emek kesimi faydalandığı kamu harcamalarından daha fazlasını kamu bütçesine aktarmaktadır. Bu durumda, emek kesimi açısından ayrıca vurgulanması gereken iki sonuç ortaya çıkmaktadır: Bunlardan birincisi, incelenen dönem boyunca, Türkiye'de sosyal ücretin finansman kaynağının ücret gelirleri olduğudur. Zira emek kesimi faydalandığı kamu hizmet ve harcamalarını kendisi finanse etmiştir. İkincisi ise, emek kesiminin kamu bütçesi karşısında net vergi ödeyicisi pozisyonunda olduğudur.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARABACAK, Y. (2022). The position of the working class across the public sector budget in Turkey: 2004-2010. Ekonomik Yaklaşım, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 82, 51–77. https://ajindex.com/articles/499667

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. AKRAM-LODHI, A. Haroon (1996), "The Public Finances of the United Kingdom: a Re-interpretation", International Review of Applied Economics, Vol. 10, No. 2, 173-193.
  2. BOWLES, Samuel, GINTIS, Herbert (1982), "The Crisis of Liberal Democratic Capitalism: The Case of the United States", Politics & Society, Vol.11, No.l, 51-93.
  3. ÇARIKÇI, Çağrı (2007), Sosyal Ücret Kavramı ve Türkiye Açısından Bir Değerlendirme, İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Maliye Anabilim Dalı Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul.
  4. FAZELI, Rafat (1996), The Economic Impact of the Welfare State and Social Wage: The British Experience, Aldershort, England: Avebury. RFAZELI, Reza, FAZELI, Rafat (2010), "The Impact of the Welfare State and Social Policy on the Working Population: The Recent British Experience", Forum for Social Economics, Vol.39, No.2, 101-125.
  5. FREEMAN, Alan (1991), "National Accounts in Value Terms: The Social Wage and Profite Rate in Britain 1950-1986", Quantitative Marxism, içinde (Ed:Paul Dunne), Potity Pres, London: 84-106.
  6. FRIEDLAND, Roger, SANDERS, Jimy (1986), "Private and Social Wage Expansion in the Advanced Market Economies", Theory and Society, Vol.15, No. 1/2, Special Double Issue: Structures of Capital, 193-222.
  7. GLYN, Andrew (1975), "Notes on the Profit Squeeze", Bulletin of the Conference of Socialist Economists, No.4, 1-11.
  8. GOUGH, Ian (1979), The Political Economy of the Welfare State, Macmillan Press Ltd, London. HARBERGER, Arnold C. (1962), "The Incidence of the Corporation Income Tax", Journal of Political Economy, Vol.70, No.3, 215-240.
  9. HYMAN, Prue (1999), "Social Wage", Encyclopedia of Political Economy, içinde (ed: Phillip Anthony O'Hara), Vol.2, Routledget Taylor Francis Group, New York, 1068-1071.
  10. JESSOP, Bob (1993), "Towards a Schumpeterian Workfare State? Preliminary Remarks on Post-Fordist Political Economy", Studies in Public Economy, No.40, 7-40.
  11. KALKINMA BAKANLIĞI (2012), "Yıllar Bazında Genel Devlet İstatistikleri", http://www.dpt.gov.tr/PortalDesign/PortalControls/WebIcerikGosterim.aspx?Enc=8 3D5A6FF03C7B4FCD54773D49FA86B2E3F52E96F34856BF419E01E77872052F 0 (Erişim Tarihi: 10-02-2012).
  12. MANIATIS, Thanasis (2003), "The Net Social Wage in Greece 1958-95", International Review of Applied Economics, Vol.17, No.4, 377-398.
  13. MANIATIS, Thanasis (2005), "Marxian Macroeconomic Categories in the Greek Economy", Review of Radical Political Economics, Vol.37, No.4, 494-516.
  14. MANIATIS, Thanasis(2010), "The Fiscal Crisis and the Social Wage in Southern Europe